RAG System Quality & Grounding Assessment (Developer Survey)
Evaluates developer experiences with Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems across retrieval quality, grounding accuracy, evaluation practices, and infrastructure. Designed for ML engineers, backend engineers, and data scientists actively building or maintaining RAG pipelines.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Have you built or maintained a RAG system in the last 6 months?
Which role best describes your day-to-day work?
Which content sources feed your retriever today? Select all that apply.
How are model answers grounded or cited in your RAG system? Select all that apply.
Which evaluation tools or libraries do you use for RAG? Select all that apply.
What is the primary programming language you use for RAG development?
How critical is retrieval quality to the overall success of your RAG system?
How many years of professional experience do you have in software, data, or ML?
Thank you for completing this survey! Your input is valuable and will help improve RAG systems and developer tooling. All results will be reported in aggregate only.
In the last 30 days, how well did retrieved context meet your task requirements?
Over the last 30 days, how much do you trust the correctness of cited evidence in your RAG system's outputs?
Which metrics best reflect your RAG quality today? Select all that apply.
What is your primary vector store or retriever backend?
How satisfied are you with your RAG system overall today?
In which region do you primarily work?
How do you set or tune top-k and related retrieval parameters?
Rank your top 3 preferred citation/grounding display styles.
If you use a custom metric, please briefly describe it and how you compute it.
Which embedding model is your primary choice?
Rank your top 3 priorities for improving your RAG system in the next 3 months.
What is the approximate size of your organization (number of employees)?
In the last 30 days, how often did you encounter irrelevant or off-topic passages in retrieval results?
In the last 30 days, how frequently did you observe hallucinations in your RAG outputs despite grounding?
How automated is your evaluation workflow?
Do you use a reranker after initial retrieval?
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or experiences about your RAG retrieval or grounding challenges.
What is the primary industry or domain for your RAG work?
In the last 30 days, how often did you encounter missing context (key information not retrieved)?
Please describe a recent grounding failure you encountered and its impact on your work.
How often do you run RAG benchmarks?
Which reranker do you use most often?
In the last 30 days, how often did you encounter stale or outdated content in retrieval results?
We'd like to understand more about your experience with grounding and citation quality. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions.
What is your end-to-end RAG latency target per query?
In the last 30 days, how often did you encounter duplicate or near-duplicate chunks in retrieval results?
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.