All Templates

Distributed Tracing Sampling Strategies Benchmark

A developer-focused research instrument for benchmarking distributed tracing sampling adoption, practices, and trade-offs across OpenTelemetry and related observability tooling. Designed for engineering teams seeking to understand how peers approach head-based, tail-based, and adaptive sampling decisions.

What's Included

AI-Powered Questions

Intelligent follow-up questions based on responses

Automated Analysis

Real-time sentiment and insight detection

Smart Distribution

Target the right audience automatically

Detailed Reports

Comprehensive insights and recommendations

Template Overview

23

Questions

AI-Powered

Smart Analysis

Ready-to-Use

Launch in Minutes

This professionally designed survey template helps you gather valuable insights with intelligent question flow and automated analysis.

Sample Survey Items

Q1
Chat Message
Welcome to this survey on distributed tracing sampling strategies. Your participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your actual practices and opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only. This survey takes approximately 8–10 minutes to complete.
Q2
Multiple Choice
Which of the following tracing or observability tools have you used in the last 6 months? Select all that apply.
  • OpenTelemetry
  • Jaeger
  • Zipkin
  • Honeycomb
  • Datadog
  • New Relic
  • AWS X-Ray
  • Grafana Tempo
  • Elastic APM
  • Other
  • None of the above
Q3
Opinion Scale
How familiar are you with tracing sampling concepts (e.g., head-based, tail-based, rate-limited sampling)?
Range: 1 7
Min: Not at all familiarMid: NeutralMax: Extremely familiar
Q4
Multiple Choice
Which sampling approaches have you implemented or configured in the last 6 months? Select all that apply.
  • Always on (head-based, 100%)
  • Head-based probabilistic (trace-level rate)
  • Rate-limited sampling
  • Tail-based sampling
  • Adaptive/dynamic sampling
  • Per-endpoint or attribute-based rules
  • I'm not sure
  • None
Q5
Multiple Choice
When using tail-based sampling, what most commonly triggers retaining a trace in your environment? Select the primary trigger.
  • Error status codes
  • High latency percentiles (e.g., p95/p99)
  • Specific endpoints or attributes
  • Adaptive scoring from backend
  • Business events or SLO breaches
  • Not applicable — I do not use tail-based sampling
Q6
Multiple Choice
What are the main reasons you have not adopted tail-based sampling? Select all that apply.
  • Implementation complexity
  • Infrastructure/resource constraints
  • Cost concerns
  • Data protection/compliance constraints
  • Not needed for our use cases
  • Lack of expertise or guidance
  • Tooling/vendor limitations
  • Not applicable — I already use tail-based sampling
Q7
Dropdown
Where are sampling decisions primarily enforced in your current environment?
  • SDK/agent level
  • Collector/gateway level
  • Backend/vendor-managed
  • In-application custom logic
  • Multiple layers
  • Unsure
Q8
Dropdown
At peak hours, approximately how many spans per minute does your system generate?
  • Fewer than 1,000
  • 1,000–10,000
  • 10,001–100,000
  • 100,001–1,000,000
  • More than 1,000,000
  • Unsure
Q9
Ranking
Rank the following tracing objectives from most important (1) to least important in your environment.
Drag to order (top = most important)
  1. Reducing observability costs
  2. Faster debugging and root-cause analysis
  3. Maintaining representative trace coverage
  4. Meeting compliance or data-retention requirements
  5. Supporting SLO monitoring and alerting
Q10
Opinion Scale
To what extent do you agree: Our current sampling rate provides sufficient trace coverage for debugging production issues.
Range: 1 7
Min: Strongly disagreeMid: NeutralMax: Strongly agree
Q11
Opinion Scale
To what extent do you agree: The cost of storing and processing traces significantly influences our sampling decisions.
Range: 1 7
Min: Strongly disagreeMid: NeutralMax: Strongly agree
Q12
Opinion Scale
To what extent do you agree: Configuring and maintaining sampling rules is straightforward in our current tooling.
Range: 1 7
Min: Strongly disagreeMid: NeutralMax: Strongly agree
Q13
Ranking
Rank the signals you most want your sampling strategy to capture reliably (1 = highest priority).
Drag to order (top = most important)
  1. Rare high-latency outliers
  2. Error spikes or regressions
  3. Customer-critical endpoint issues
  4. Incidents after new releases
  5. Cross-service contention or bottlenecks
Q14
Opinion Scale
How likely are you to adjust your sampling strategy in the next 3 months?
Range: 1 7
Min: Not at all likelyMid: NeutralMax: Extremely likely
Q15
Multiple Choice
Scenario: A consumer-facing API averages 10,000 requests per second with periodic traffic spikes and a limited observability budget. Which baseline sampling strategy would you start with?
  • Head-based probabilistic at a low fixed rate (e.g., 0.1–1%)
  • Rate-limited head sampling with per-service quotas
  • Tail-based triggers (errors/high latency) with a minimal baseline
  • Always on (100%) to maximize coverage
  • There isn't enough information to decide
Q16
Long Text
Briefly explain your reasoning for the sampling strategy you selected in the scenario above.
Max chars
Q17
AI Interview
We'd like to explore your sampling decisions in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your responses so far.
AI InterviewLength: 2Personality: [Object Object]Mode: Fast
Reference questions: 5
Q18
Long Text
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or context about your tracing and sampling strategy.
Max chars
Q19
Dropdown
What is your primary role?
  • Backend/software engineer
  • SRE/Operations
  • Platform/Infrastructure
  • DevOps
  • Observability/Telemetry
  • Data/Analytics
  • Engineering manager
  • Architect
  • Other
Q20
Dropdown
How many years have you worked with distributed systems?
  • Less than 1
  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • 11+
Q21
Dropdown
Approximately how many employees are in your organization?
  • 1–49
  • 50–249
  • 250–999
  • 1,000–4,999
  • 5,000+
Q22
Dropdown
Which region do you primarily work in?
  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Latin America
  • Middle East & Africa
  • Other
Q23
Chat Message
Thank you for completing this survey — your responses will help improve tracing and sampling practices across the community. Your data will be reported in aggregate only.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is QuestionPunk?
QuestionPunk is a lightweight survey platform for live AI interviews you control. It's fast, flexible, and scalable—adapting every question in real time, moderating responses across languages, letting you steer prompts, models, and flows, and even generating surveys from a simple prompt. Get interview-grade insight with survey-level speed across qual and quant.
How do I create my first survey?
Sign up, then decide how you want to build: let the AI generate a survey from your prompt, pick a template, or start from scratch. Choose question types, set logic, and preview before sharing.
How can I share surveys with my team?
Send a project link so teammates can view and collaborate instantly.
Can the AI generate a survey from a prompt?
Yes. Provide a prompt and QuestionPunk drafts a survey you can tweak before sending.
How long does support typically take to reply?
We reply within 24 hours—often much sooner. Include key details in your message to help us assist you faster.
Can I export survey results?
Absolutely. Export results as CSV straight from the results page for quick data work.

Ready to Get Started?

Launch your survey in minutes with this pre-built template