All Templates

Experimentation Maturity & Data Trust Assessment

Measures A/B testing ease-of-use, guardrail adoption, result trust, and decision confidence among product and engineering teams. Use it to identify friction points, governance gaps, and training needs to scale experimentation.

What's Included

AI-Powered Questions

Intelligent follow-up questions based on responses

Automated Analysis

Real-time sentiment and insight detection

Smart Distribution

Target the right audience automatically

Detailed Reports

Comprehensive insights and recommendations

Template Overview

24

Questions

AI-Powered

Smart Analysis

Ready-to-Use

Launch in Minutes

This professionally designed survey template helps you gather valuable insights with intelligent question flow and automated analysis.

Sample Survey Items

Q1
Chat Message
Welcome! This survey explores your experimentation practices and confidence in results. It takes approximately 5–7 minutes to complete. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest experience. All responses are confidential, anonymized, and reported only in aggregate to improve experimentation practices.
Q2
Multiple Choice
How often are experiments (e.g., A/B tests, feature experiments) part of your work?
  • Regularly (monthly or more)
  • Occasionally (quarterly)
  • Rarely (yearly or less)
  • Never
Q3
Multiple Choice
Which platforms or approaches do you currently use for experimentation? Select all that apply.
  • In-house experimentation framework
  • Feature flag platform (e.g., LaunchDarkly, Flagsmith)
  • Third-party A/B tool (e.g., Optimizely, VWO, AB Tasty)
  • SQL / notebooks only (no dedicated tool)
  • Dashboarding tool (e.g., internal BI)
  • None of the above
  • Other (please specify)
Q4
Dropdown
In the last 3 months, approximately how many experiments did you help design, run, or analyze?
  • 0
  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • 11–20
  • More than 20
Q5
Opinion Scale
How easy or difficult is it to set up a standard A/B test using your current tools and processes?
Range: 1 7
Min: Very difficultMid: NeutralMax: Very easy
Q6
Opinion Scale
How easy or difficult is it to analyze a completed experiment and interpret its results?
Range: 1 7
Min: Very difficultMid: NeutralMax: Very easy
Q7
Multiple Choice
Which of the following quality controls are currently enforced in your experimentation workflow? Select all that apply.
  • Pre-launch checklist
  • Blocking deployment on missing instrumentation
  • Automated SRM (sample ratio mismatch) alerting
  • Sequential testing / alpha spending
  • Max exposure or blast-radius limits
  • Quality gates for key metrics
  • Post-experiment QA template
  • None of the above
  • Other (please specify)
Q8
Multiple Choice
What is the primary decision rule your team uses to determine whether an experiment's results are conclusive?
  • Fixed p-value threshold (e.g., 0.05)
  • Bayesian decision rule
  • Business threshold / minimum detectable effect
  • Case-by-case judgement
  • No standard rule / not sure
  • Other (please specify)
Q9
Opinion Scale
How much do you trust your organization's experiment results to inform product decisions?
Range: 1 7
Min: Not at allMid: NeutralMax: Completely
Q10
Opinion Scale
How confident are you in acting on an experiment's outcome to make a product or business decision?
Range: 1 7
Min: Not at all confidentMid: NeutralMax: Extremely confident
Q11
Long Text
What, if anything, most undermines your trust in experiment results today? Please share specifics.
Max chars
Q12
Ranking
Rank the following blockers to reliable experimentation from biggest (top) to smallest (bottom).
Drag to order (top = most important)
  1. Data quality / instrumentation issues
  2. Metric definitions ambiguity
  3. Sample contamination / overlap
  4. Insufficient traffic / power
  5. Engineering constraints / time
  6. Organizational pressure to ship
Q13
Ranking
Rank the following phases of a typical experiment by how much effort they require (most effort at top).
Drag to order (top = most important)
  1. Planning and design
  2. Instrumentation and data validation
  3. Implementation and rollout setup
  4. Running and monitoring
  5. Analysis and interpretation
  6. Decision and rollout
  7. Documentation and communication
Q14
Long Text
What one change would most improve your experimentation workflow?
Max chars
Q15
Chat Message
The next two questions are for those who do not currently run experiments. If you do run experiments, please skip ahead.
Q16
Multiple Choice
What are the main reasons you do not currently run experiments? Select all that apply.
  • Not enough traffic to test
  • Missing instrumentation / metrics
  • Tooling is hard to use
  • Unclear process or approvals
  • Lack of statistical support
  • Feature timelines too tight
  • We prioritize other methods (e.g., user research)
  • Other (please specify)
Q17
Long Text
What resources, tools, or support would help you start running experiments confidently?
Max chars
Q18
AI Interview
Based on your responses, we'd like to explore your experimentation experience in a bit more depth. Please share your thoughts openly—an AI moderator may ask a follow-up question or two.
AI InterviewLength: 2Personality: [Object Object]Mode: Fast
Reference questions: 7
Q19
Multiple Choice
What is your primary role?
  • Product manager
  • Engineer
  • Data scientist / analyst
  • Designer / UX
  • Growth / marketing
  • Other (please specify)
Q20
Multiple Choice
Which team are you primarily part of?
  • Core product
  • Platform / infrastructure
  • Growth / monetization
  • Data / analytics
  • Other / cross-functional
Q21
Multiple Choice
How many years have you been involved in running or analyzing experiments?
  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–9 years
  • 10+ years
Q22
Multiple Choice
Where are you primarily located?
  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Prefer not to say
Q23
Multiple Choice
Approximately how many employees are in your company?
  • 1–49
  • 50–249
  • 250–999
  • 1,000–4,999
  • 5,000+
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
Chat Message
All set—thank you for sharing your perspective! Your responses will help us identify ways to improve experimentation practices across the organization.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is QuestionPunk?
QuestionPunk is an AI-powered survey and research platform that turns traditional surveys into adaptive conversations. Describe your research goal and get a complete survey draft, conduct AI-moderated interviews with dynamic follow-ups, detect low-quality responses, and produce insights automatically. It's fast, flexible, and scalable across qualitative and quantitative research.
How do I create my first survey?
Sign up, then choose how to build: describe your research goal and let AI generate a survey, pick a template, or start from scratch. Add question types, set logic, preview, and share.
Can the AI generate a survey from a prompt?
Yes. Describe your research goal in plain language and QuestionPunk drafts a complete survey with appropriate question types, ordering, and AI follow-up logic. You can then customize before publishing.
What question types are available?
QuestionPunk supports a wide range of question types: opinion scale, rating, multiple choice, dropdown, ranking, matrix, constant sum, AI interview (text and audio), long text, short text, email, phone, date, address, website, numeric, audio/video recording, contact form, chat message, conversation reset, button, page breaks, and more.
How do AI interviews work?
AI interviews conduct adaptive conversations with respondents. The AI asks follow-up questions based on what the respondent says, probing for clarity and depth. You control the personality, tone, model (Haiku, Sonnet, or Opus), and question mode (fixed count, AI decides when to stop, or time-based).
Can I test my survey before launching?
Yes. Use synthetic testing to create AI personas and run them through your survey. This helps catch issues with question flow, logic, and wording before real respondents see it.
How many languages are supported?
QuestionPunk supports 142+ languages. Add languages from the survey editor, auto-translate questions, and share language-specific links. AI interviews also adapt to the respondent's language automatically.
How can I share my survey?
Share via a direct link (with optional custom slug), embed on your website (iframe or script), distribute through Prolific for research panels, or generate a QR code for physical distribution.
Can I export survey results?
Yes. Export as CSV (flat or wide layout), Excel (XLSX), or export the survey structure as PDF/Word. Filter by suspicious level, response type, language, or date range before exporting.
Does QuestionPunk detect fraudulent responses?
Yes. Every response is automatically classified with a suspicious level (low/medium/high) based on attention checks, response timing, and behavioral signals. You can filter flagged responses in the Responses tab.
What are the pricing plans?
Basic (Free): 20 responses/month. Business ($50/month or $500/year): 5,000 responses/month with priority support. Enterprise (Custom): unlimited responses, remove branding, custom domain, and dedicated support.
How long does support take to reply?
We reply within 24 hours, often much sooner. Include key details in your message to help us assist you faster.

Ready to Get Started?

Launch your survey in minutes with this pre-built template