All Templates

Data Labeling QA, Bias & Instruction Clarity Audit

An operational audit survey for data labeling teams, measuring instruction clarity, bias mitigation practices, QA rigor, and workflow bottlenecks over the last 30 days. Designed for labelers, reviewers, and QA leads.

What's Included

AI-Powered Questions

Intelligent follow-up questions based on responses

Automated Analysis

Real-time sentiment and insight detection

Smart Distribution

Target the right audience automatically

Detailed Reports

Comprehensive insights and recommendations

Template Overview

25

Questions

AI-Powered

Smart Analysis

Ready-to-Use

Launch in Minutes

This professionally designed survey template helps you gather valuable insights with intelligent question flow and automated analysis.

Sample Survey Items

Q1
Chat Message
Welcome! This survey takes about 5–7 minutes and asks about your data labeling work over the last 30 days. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest experience. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to improve labeling operations. By continuing, you agree to participate.
Q2
Multiple Choice
In the past 30 days, which of the following tasks have you performed? Select all that apply.
  • Labeling / annotation
  • Reviewing / QA
  • Both labeling and reviewing
  • Other (please specify)
Q3
Dropdown
How long have you worked on this labeling program?
  • Less than 1 month
  • 1–3 months
  • 4–6 months
  • 7–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • More than 2 years
Q4
Opinion Scale
Overall, how clear were the task instructions you received in the last 30 days?
Range: 1 7
Min: Very unclearMid: NeutralMax: Very clear
Q5
Opinion Scale
In the last 30 days, how often did task instructions change mid-project?
Range: 1 5
Min: NeverMid: NeutralMax: Very frequently
Q6
Long Text
If you encountered any unclear or conflicting instructions in the last 30 days, please briefly describe one example. If none, you may skip this question.
Max chars
Q7
Multiple Choice
Which of the following bias topics are covered in your current labeling guidelines? Select all that apply.
  • Demographic bias (e.g., gender, race, age)
  • Domain or jargon bias
  • Geographic / vernacular variation
  • Label leakage or proxy signals
  • Harmful stereotypes and toxicity
  • Context / translation bias
  • None of the above
  • Other (please specify)
Q8
Opinion Scale
In the last 30 days, how often did you encounter inputs or labels that appeared biased?
Range: 1 5
Min: NeverMid: NeutralMax: Very often
Q9
Opinion Scale
When bias is suspected, how clear is the process for escalating the issue?
Range: 1 7
Min: Not at all clearMid: NeutralMax: Extremely clear
Q10
Long Text
If you encountered a potentially biased input or label recently, please briefly describe the example and how you handled it. If none, you may skip this question.
Max chars
Q11
Opinion Scale
How clear are the acceptance criteria used for reviewing labeled work?
Range: 1 7
Min: Not at all clearMid: NeutralMax: Extremely clear
Q12
Multiple Choice
Which review approach is used most often on your current program?
  • Blind double review with adjudication
  • Spot checks (fixed percentage)
  • Heuristic-triggered review (rules-based)
  • Peer review within team
  • Self-review before submit
  • Not sure
  • Other (please specify)
Q13
Opinion Scale
How useful was the review feedback you received in the last 30 days for improving your labeling accuracy?
Range: 1 7
Min: Not at all usefulMid: NeutralMax: Extremely useful
Q14
Opinion Scale
How timely was the review feedback you received in the last 30 days?
Range: 1 7
Min: Not at all timelyMid: NeutralMax: Extremely timely
Q15
Dropdown
Approximately what percentage of your labeled items were returned for rework in the last 30 days?
  • 0%
  • 1–5%
  • 6–10%
  • 11–20%
  • 21–30%
  • 31–50%
  • More than 50%
  • Not sure
Q16
Ranking
From the list below, rank the top causes of rework you observed in the last 30 days, from most common to least common.
Drag to order (top = most important)
  1. Unclear or changing guidelines
  2. Reviewer–labeler disagreement
  3. Edge cases not covered
  4. Tooling or platform issues
  5. Time pressure or quotas
  6. Insufficient training or context
Q17
Multiple Choice
Which of the following activities takes the largest share of your typical work week on this program?
  • Labeling / annotation
  • Review / QA
  • Guideline reading / updating
  • Meetings / syncs
  • Training / onboarding
  • Escalations or questions
  • Other (please specify)
Q18
Multiple Choice
Which of the following tooling issues most slowed your quality or speed in the last 30 days? Select all that apply.
  • Slow loading or lag
  • Limited shortcuts or templates
  • Poor diff / compare views
  • Unclear error messages
  • Hard to flag bias or edge cases
  • Limited audit trail / metadata
  • None of the above
  • Other (please specify)
Q19
Long Text
If you could make one change to improve clarity, fairness, or quality assurance in your labeling work, what would it be?
Max chars
Q20
AI Interview
Based on your responses, we'd like to explore a few of your experiences in more depth. An AI moderator will ask you 1–2 follow-up questions about your labeling operations.
AI InterviewLength: 2Personality: [Object Object]Mode: Fast
Reference questions: 6
Q21
Dropdown
What is your primary working region?
  • North America
  • Latin America
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • South Asia
  • East Asia
  • Southeast Asia
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
Dropdown
What is your primary working language?
  • English
  • Spanish
  • Portuguese
  • French
  • German
  • Chinese
  • Japanese
  • Korean
  • Hindi
  • Arabic
  • Other (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say
Q23
Dropdown
How much total experience do you have in data labeling or annotation?
  • Less than 6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6+ years
Q24
Dropdown
What is your employment type on this program?
  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Contract / Freelance
  • Prefer not to say
Q25
Chat Message
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will directly inform improvements to instruction clarity, bias mitigation, and quality assurance processes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is QuestionPunk?
QuestionPunk is an AI-powered survey and research platform that turns traditional surveys into adaptive conversations. Describe your research goal and get a complete survey draft, conduct AI-moderated interviews with dynamic follow-ups, detect low-quality responses, and produce insights automatically. It's fast, flexible, and scalable across qualitative and quantitative research.
How do I create my first survey?
Sign up, then choose how to build: describe your research goal and let AI generate a survey, pick a template, or start from scratch. Add question types, set logic, preview, and share.
Can the AI generate a survey from a prompt?
Yes. Describe your research goal in plain language and QuestionPunk drafts a complete survey with appropriate question types, ordering, and AI follow-up logic. You can then customize before publishing.
What question types are available?
QuestionPunk supports a wide range of question types: opinion scale, rating, multiple choice, dropdown, ranking, matrix, constant sum, AI interview (text and audio), long text, short text, email, phone, date, address, website, numeric, audio/video recording, contact form, chat message, conversation reset, button, page breaks, and more.
How do AI interviews work?
AI interviews conduct adaptive conversations with respondents. The AI asks follow-up questions based on what the respondent says, probing for clarity and depth. You control the personality, tone, model (Haiku, Sonnet, or Opus), and question mode (fixed count, AI decides when to stop, or time-based).
Can I test my survey before launching?
Yes. Use synthetic testing to create AI personas and run them through your survey. This helps catch issues with question flow, logic, and wording before real respondents see it.
How many languages are supported?
QuestionPunk supports 142+ languages. Add languages from the survey editor, auto-translate questions, and share language-specific links. AI interviews also adapt to the respondent's language automatically.
How can I share my survey?
Share via a direct link (with optional custom slug), embed on your website (iframe or script), distribute through Prolific for research panels, or generate a QR code for physical distribution.
Can I export survey results?
Yes. Export as CSV (flat or wide layout), Excel (XLSX), or export the survey structure as PDF/Word. Filter by suspicious level, response type, language, or date range before exporting.
Does QuestionPunk detect fraudulent responses?
Yes. Every response is automatically classified with a suspicious level (low/medium/high) based on attention checks, response timing, and behavioral signals. You can filter flagged responses in the Responses tab.
What are the pricing plans?
Basic (Free): 20 responses/month. Business ($50/month or $500/year): 5,000 responses/month with priority support. Enterprise (Custom): unlimited responses, remove branding, custom domain, and dedicated support.
How long does support take to reply?
We reply within 24 hours, often much sooner. Include key details in your message to help us assist you faster.

Ready to Get Started?

Launch your survey in minutes with this pre-built template