All templates
Healthcare & Clinical

LIS Usability & Data Integrity Assessment

Evaluates laboratory information system usability, data accuracy, and workflow efficiency for biotech and healthcare lab professionals based on recent 30–90 day experience.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

30 questions · ~13 min
Q01
Message

Welcome to the LIS Usability & Data Integrity Assessment. This survey asks about your recent experience with your primary Laboratory Information System. It should take approximately 8–10 minutes to complete. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. By continuing, you indicate your consent to participate.

Q02
Multiple Choice

Do you directly enter or verify test results in the LIS?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
Opinion Scale

Overall, how easy is your primary LIS to use for your daily work?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q04
Dropdown

In the last 30 days, how often did you encounter data entry errors that required correction?

  • Never
  • Once in the last 30 days
  • 2–3 times in the last 30 days
  • About weekly
  • Several times per week
  • Daily or almost daily
Q05
Dropdown

Approximately how many total hours of unplanned LIS downtime occurred in the last 90 days?

  • 0 (no unplanned downtime)
  • Less than 1 hour
  • 1–4 hours
  • 5–8 hours
  • 9–24 hours
  • More than 24 hours
  • Not sure
Q06
Opinion Scale

How would you rate the training you received on accurate data entry and handling in the LIS?

Scale: 17
Min:Very inadequateMax:More than adequate
Q07
Ranking

Please rank the following potential improvements from most important to least important for strengthening LIS usability and data integrity.

  1. More informative error messages
  2. Stronger real-time validation rules
  3. Faster search and filtering
  4. Clearer audit trail views/exports
  5. Better downtime and rollback workflows
  6. Simplified order entry and verification
Drag to rank
Q08
Long Text

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions about LIS usability or data integrity.

Q09
Dropdown

What is your primary role?

  • Medical technologist/MLS
  • Lab supervisor or manager
  • Pathologist
  • LIS/IT or integration specialist
  • QA/Regulatory
  • Phlebotomy/accessioning
  • Research scientist
  • Other
Q10
Message

Thank you for completing this survey. Your input will directly inform improvements to LIS usability and data integrity practices. You may now close this window.

Q11
Multiple Choice

Which Laboratory Information System (LIS) do you primarily use?

  • Epic Beaker
  • Cerner PathNet
  • Sunquest
  • Orchard Harvest
  • SoftLab (SCC)
  • LabWare
  • Custom or in-house system
  • Not sure
  • Other (please specify)
Q12
Opinion Scale

Thinking about the last 30 days, to what extent do you agree: Navigating between LIS modules and screens is straightforward.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q13
Multiple Choice

In the last 90 days, which data integrity issues have you personally observed? Select all that apply.

  • Duplicate patient or sample records
  • Mismatched patient ID or demographics
  • Specimen mislabeling detected by the system
  • Result overwritten or lost
  • Incomplete audit trail for a change
  • Interface transmission failure or delay
  • Reference range or version mismatch
  • None of the above
  • Other (please specify)
Q14
Dropdown

During peak hours in the last 30 days, how often did the LIS feel noticeably slow?

  • Never
  • Once in the last 30 days
  • 2–3 times in the last 30 days
  • About weekly
  • Several times per week
  • Daily or almost daily
Q15
Opinion Scale

How satisfied are you with the support you receive (vendor or internal) when you encounter LIS data issues?

Scale: 17
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q16
AI Interview

We'd like to understand more about your LIS experience. An AI moderator will ask a couple of brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.

Q17
Dropdown

What is your primary lab setting?

  • Hospital
  • Academic medical center
  • Independent/reference lab
  • Biotech/pharma
  • Public health lab
  • Clinic/physician office
  • Other
Q18
Dropdown

How often do you use your primary LIS in your job?

  • All day (most hours)
  • Several times per day
  • About once per day
  • A few times per week
  • Less often
Q19
Opinion Scale

Thinking about the last 30 days, to what extent do you agree: Completing routine tasks requires a reasonable number of clicks or steps.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q20
Opinion Scale

How confident are you that data in your primary LIS are accurate and complete?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Extremely confident
Q21
Dropdown

How many years of total experience do you have working in laboratory settings?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–3 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 5–10 years
  • Over 10 years
Q22
Dropdown

How long have you used this primary LIS?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3–12 months
  • 1–3 years
  • 3–5 years
  • Over 5 years
Q23
Opinion Scale

Thinking about the last 30 days, to what extent do you agree: Error messages clearly help me understand what went wrong and how to fix it.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q24
Dropdown

When needed in the last 90 days, how easy was it to retrieve a complete audit trail?

  • Very difficult
  • Difficult
  • Neither easy nor difficult
  • Easy
  • Very easy
  • Not applicable
Q25
Dropdown

What is your primary work shift?

  • Day
  • Evening
  • Night
  • Rotating
  • Varies/Not applicable
Q26
Multiple Choice

Which systems are currently integrated with your LIS? Select all that apply.

  • EHR/EMR
  • Analyzer/instrument interfaces
  • Middleware/automation
  • Billing/finance
  • Reference lab interfaces
  • Reporting/analytics/BI
  • Inventory/supply
  • Quality management tools (e.g., CAP/CLIA)
  • None of the above
  • Not sure
  • Other (please specify)
Q27
Opinion Scale

Thinking about the last 30 days, to what extent do you agree: The LIS interface layout is intuitive and well organized.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q28
Opinion Scale

To what extent do you agree: the LIS validation rules prevent most incorrect or incomplete entries.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q29
Opinion Scale

Overall, how satisfied are you with the usability of your primary LIS?

Scale: 17
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q30
Multiple Choice

In the last 30 days, which LIS tasks were most time-consuming? Select all that apply.

  • Order entry
  • Specimen accessioning
  • Test result entry/verification
  • Result corrections/amendments
  • Patient or result search
  • Quality control documentation
  • Worklist management
  • Report generation
  • Interface troubleshooting
  • Other (please specify)

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Pairs standardized usability agreement statements (navigation, routine task completion, error message clarity, interface satisfaction) with LIS-specific data integrity items like audit trail retrieval, validation rule effectiveness, and unplanned downtime — content generic usability templates don't cover
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview so respondents can elaborate on the specific integrity issues or time-consuming tasks they flagged, adding qualitative depth without a separate study
  • Captures role, lab setting, years of experience, and shift alongside compliance-relevant questions, letting quality and IT teams segment findings by who is affected and where
  • Closes with a ranked improvement-priorities question, open-text reflection, and an auto-generated report, so findings on both usability and data accuracy are ready to act on immediately

QuestionPro

System Usability Scale Survey Template

A fielding-ready implementation of the standard System Usability Scale (SUS), generic to any software product rather than laboratory systems specifically. Useful if a lab team wants a quick, benchmarked usability score but not built to probe LIS-specific concerns like data integrity, validation rules, or downtime.

What it does well

  • Based on the well-established, benchmarked SUS methodology
  • Quick to deploy for a general usability snapshot
  • Familiar format for teams wanting comparability across tools/products

Where it falls short

  • Not tailored to laboratory information systems or data integrity/compliance concerns
  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up probing into flagged pain points
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated report

SurveySparrow

Laboratory Competency Assessment Form Template

Targets healthcare lab staff like our template, but focuses on assessing individual competency/skills rather than LIS usability or data integrity. It's a static, conversational-style form, not an adaptive interview, and doesn't address system-level workflow or data quality issues.

What it does well

  • Audience-appropriate for laboratory/healthcare professionals
  • SurveySparrow's conversational form style may improve completion rates
  • Structured for competency/skills evaluation use cases

Where it falls short

  • Does not evaluate LIS usability, data accuracy, or workflow efficiency
  • No adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview option to explore individual responses
  • No published methodology for scoring or transparent prompt logic

Typeform

System Usability Survey Template

A generic system usability survey with Typeform's polished conversational interface, applicable to any software but not written for laboratory information systems or regulatory data-integrity concerns. It's a fixed-question template rather than an adaptive interview tool.

What it does well

  • Clean, conversational one-question-at-a-time UI that may boost completion
  • Simple to adapt wording for different software products
  • Easy to launch quickly with minimal setup

Where it falls short

  • No LIS-specific or data integrity content (audit trails, validation rules, downtime)
  • Static form with no adaptive or voice AI follow-up interviewing
  • No automated quality scoring or auto-generated analytical report

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
Healthcare & Clinical

Teletherapy Access, Experience & Outcomes Assessment

Evaluates patient access barriers, session comfort, perceived therapeutic outcomes, and format preferences for teletherapy. Designed for healthcare organizations and telehealth platforms seeking to improve virtual care delivery.

View template
Healthcare & Clinical

Patient Scheduling & Reminder Satisfaction Survey

Evaluates patient satisfaction with healthcare appointment booking, confirmation, and reminder processes to identify friction points, optimize communication timing, and reduce no-show rates.

View template
Healthcare & Clinical

Aging in Place: Community Needs Assessment for Adults 60+

Assesses daily living challenges, home safety, care coordination, and support priorities among community-dwelling older adults to inform program planning and resource allocation.

View template
Healthcare & Clinical

Group Therapy Informed Consent & Readiness Check

Confirms that a new group therapy member understands confidentiality limits, voluntary participation, and what to expect, while gauging comfort with sharing in front of others. An AI follow-up interview surfaces the specific worries behind low comfort or confusion so facilitators can address them before the first session. Built for therapists and group practices running intake.

View template
Healthcare & Clinical

Dental Screening & Oral Health Check-In Survey

Captures a patient's oral hygiene habits, symptoms, and dental visit history ahead of or following a screening, for dental practices, insurers, or public health programs. The AI follow-up interview digs into any reported pain or concern to surface details a checklist alone would miss, helping clinicians triage and prioritize care.

View template
Healthcare & Clinical

Post-Graduation Career Outcomes for Healthcare Programs

Tracks what actually happened to graduates of a nursing, allied health, or clinical training program after they left — employment status, licensure pass-through, field relevance, and pay — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the real job-search story behind the numbers. Built for program directors, career services, and accreditation reporting.

View template