LIS Usability & Data Integrity Assessment
Evaluates laboratory information system usability, data accuracy, and workflow efficiency for biotech and healthcare lab professionals based on recent 30–90 day experience.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Do you directly enter or verify test results in the LIS?
- Yes
- No
Overall, how easy is your primary LIS to use for your daily work?
In the last 30 days, how often did you encounter data entry errors that required correction?
- Never
- Once in the last 30 days
- 2–3 times in the last 30 days
- About weekly
- Several times per week
- Daily or almost daily
Approximately how many total hours of unplanned LIS downtime occurred in the last 90 days?
- 0 (no unplanned downtime)
- Less than 1 hour
- 1–4 hours
- 5–8 hours
- 9–24 hours
- More than 24 hours
- Not sure
How would you rate the training you received on accurate data entry and handling in the LIS?
Please rank the following potential improvements from most important to least important for strengthening LIS usability and data integrity.
- More informative error messages
- Stronger real-time validation rules
- Faster search and filtering
- Clearer audit trail views/exports
- Better downtime and rollback workflows
- Simplified order entry and verification
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions about LIS usability or data integrity.
What is your primary role?
- Medical technologist/MLS
- Lab supervisor or manager
- Pathologist
- LIS/IT or integration specialist
- QA/Regulatory
- Phlebotomy/accessioning
- Research scientist
- Other
Thank you for completing this survey. Your input will directly inform improvements to LIS usability and data integrity practices. You may now close this window.
Which Laboratory Information System (LIS) do you primarily use?
- Epic Beaker
- Cerner PathNet
- Sunquest
- Orchard Harvest
- SoftLab (SCC)
- LabWare
- Custom or in-house system
- Not sure
- Other (please specify)
Thinking about the last 30 days, to what extent do you agree: Navigating between LIS modules and screens is straightforward.
In the last 90 days, which data integrity issues have you personally observed? Select all that apply.
- Duplicate patient or sample records
- Mismatched patient ID or demographics
- Specimen mislabeling detected by the system
- Result overwritten or lost
- Incomplete audit trail for a change
- Interface transmission failure or delay
- Reference range or version mismatch
- None of the above
- Other (please specify)
During peak hours in the last 30 days, how often did the LIS feel noticeably slow?
- Never
- Once in the last 30 days
- 2–3 times in the last 30 days
- About weekly
- Several times per week
- Daily or almost daily
How satisfied are you with the support you receive (vendor or internal) when you encounter LIS data issues?
We'd like to understand more about your LIS experience. An AI moderator will ask a couple of brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
What is your primary lab setting?
- Hospital
- Academic medical center
- Independent/reference lab
- Biotech/pharma
- Public health lab
- Clinic/physician office
- Other
How often do you use your primary LIS in your job?
- All day (most hours)
- Several times per day
- About once per day
- A few times per week
- Less often
Thinking about the last 30 days, to what extent do you agree: Completing routine tasks requires a reasonable number of clicks or steps.
How confident are you that data in your primary LIS are accurate and complete?
How many years of total experience do you have working in laboratory settings?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–3 years
- 3–5 years
- 5–10 years
- Over 10 years
How long have you used this primary LIS?
- Less than 3 months
- 3–12 months
- 1–3 years
- 3–5 years
- Over 5 years
Thinking about the last 30 days, to what extent do you agree: Error messages clearly help me understand what went wrong and how to fix it.
When needed in the last 90 days, how easy was it to retrieve a complete audit trail?
- Very difficult
- Difficult
- Neither easy nor difficult
- Easy
- Very easy
- Not applicable
What is your primary work shift?
- Day
- Evening
- Night
- Rotating
- Varies/Not applicable
Which systems are currently integrated with your LIS? Select all that apply.
- EHR/EMR
- Analyzer/instrument interfaces
- Middleware/automation
- Billing/finance
- Reference lab interfaces
- Reporting/analytics/BI
- Inventory/supply
- Quality management tools (e.g., CAP/CLIA)
- None of the above
- Not sure
- Other (please specify)
Thinking about the last 30 days, to what extent do you agree: The LIS interface layout is intuitive and well organized.
To what extent do you agree: the LIS validation rules prevent most incorrect or incomplete entries.
Overall, how satisfied are you with the usability of your primary LIS?
In the last 30 days, which LIS tasks were most time-consuming? Select all that apply.
- Order entry
- Specimen accessioning
- Test result entry/verification
- Result corrections/amendments
- Patient or result search
- Quality control documentation
- Worklist management
- Report generation
- Interface troubleshooting
- Other (please specify)
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Pairs standardized usability agreement statements (navigation, routine task completion, error message clarity, interface satisfaction) with LIS-specific data integrity items like audit trail retrieval, validation rule effectiveness, and unplanned downtime — content generic usability templates don't cover
- Includes an AI follow-up interview so respondents can elaborate on the specific integrity issues or time-consuming tasks they flagged, adding qualitative depth without a separate study
- Captures role, lab setting, years of experience, and shift alongside compliance-relevant questions, letting quality and IT teams segment findings by who is affected and where
- Closes with a ranked improvement-priorities question, open-text reflection, and an auto-generated report, so findings on both usability and data accuracy are ready to act on immediately
QuestionPro
System Usability Scale Survey TemplateA fielding-ready implementation of the standard System Usability Scale (SUS), generic to any software product rather than laboratory systems specifically. Useful if a lab team wants a quick, benchmarked usability score but not built to probe LIS-specific concerns like data integrity, validation rules, or downtime.
What it does well
- Based on the well-established, benchmarked SUS methodology
- Quick to deploy for a general usability snapshot
- Familiar format for teams wanting comparability across tools/products
Where it falls short
- Not tailored to laboratory information systems or data integrity/compliance concerns
- Static question set with no adaptive follow-up probing into flagged pain points
- No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated report
SurveySparrow
Laboratory Competency Assessment Form TemplateTargets healthcare lab staff like our template, but focuses on assessing individual competency/skills rather than LIS usability or data integrity. It's a static, conversational-style form, not an adaptive interview, and doesn't address system-level workflow or data quality issues.
What it does well
- Audience-appropriate for laboratory/healthcare professionals
- SurveySparrow's conversational form style may improve completion rates
- Structured for competency/skills evaluation use cases
Where it falls short
- Does not evaluate LIS usability, data accuracy, or workflow efficiency
- No adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview option to explore individual responses
- No published methodology for scoring or transparent prompt logic
Typeform
System Usability Survey TemplateA generic system usability survey with Typeform's polished conversational interface, applicable to any software but not written for laboratory information systems or regulatory data-integrity concerns. It's a fixed-question template rather than an adaptive interview tool.
What it does well
- Clean, conversational one-question-at-a-time UI that may boost completion
- Simple to adapt wording for different software products
- Easy to launch quickly with minimal setup
Where it falls short
- No LIS-specific or data integrity content (audit trails, validation rules, downtime)
- Static form with no adaptive or voice AI follow-up interviewing
- No automated quality scoring or auto-generated analytical report
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Teletherapy Access, Experience & Outcomes Assessment
Evaluates patient access barriers, session comfort, perceived therapeutic outcomes, and format preferences for teletherapy. Designed for healthcare organizations and telehealth platforms seeking to improve virtual care delivery.
View templatePatient Scheduling & Reminder Satisfaction Survey
Evaluates patient satisfaction with healthcare appointment booking, confirmation, and reminder processes to identify friction points, optimize communication timing, and reduce no-show rates.
View templateAging in Place: Community Needs Assessment for Adults 60+
Assesses daily living challenges, home safety, care coordination, and support priorities among community-dwelling older adults to inform program planning and resource allocation.
View templateGroup Therapy Informed Consent & Readiness Check
Confirms that a new group therapy member understands confidentiality limits, voluntary participation, and what to expect, while gauging comfort with sharing in front of others. An AI follow-up interview surfaces the specific worries behind low comfort or confusion so facilitators can address them before the first session. Built for therapists and group practices running intake.
View templateDental Screening & Oral Health Check-In Survey
Captures a patient's oral hygiene habits, symptoms, and dental visit history ahead of or following a screening, for dental practices, insurers, or public health programs. The AI follow-up interview digs into any reported pain or concern to surface details a checklist alone would miss, helping clinicians triage and prioritize care.
View templatePost-Graduation Career Outcomes for Healthcare Programs
Tracks what actually happened to graduates of a nursing, allied health, or clinical training program after they left — employment status, licensure pass-through, field relevance, and pay — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the real job-search story behind the numbers. Built for program directors, career services, and accreditation reporting.
View template