All templates
Sustainability & Impact

Scope 3 GHG Emissions Readiness Assessment

Evaluates internal stakeholder readiness to measure and report Scope 3 supply chain emissions, identifying capability gaps, data maturity, supplier engagement levels, and barriers across functional teams.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

27 questions · ~12 min
Q01
Message

Welcome to the Scope 3 Emissions Readiness Assessment. This survey gathers input from internal stakeholders to evaluate our organization's readiness to measure and report Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions. Your responses will help identify gaps, prioritize resources, and build a roadmap for GHG reporting. This should take approximately 10–12 minutes. There are no right or wrong answers—we are looking for your honest assessment based on your role and experience. All responses will be aggregated and reported anonymously. Participation is voluntary, and you may exit at any time. Please proceed when you are ready.

Q02
Multiple Choice

Which areas are you involved in for Scope 3 work? Select all that apply.

  • Sustainability / ESG
  • Procurement / Supply chain
  • Finance / Controllership
  • Operations / Manufacturing
  • IT / Data
  • Product / Engineering
  • Legal / Compliance
  • Executive leadership
  • Other
Q03
Ranking

Rank the top barriers to initiating or advancing Scope 3 measurement (biggest barrier first).

  1. Limited data availability or access
  2. Low supplier response or engagement
  3. Lack of clear internal ownership
  4. Tools or IT capability gaps
  5. Budget or time constraints
Drag to rank
Q04
Multiple Choice

Which Scope 3 categories has our organization measured or estimated in the last 12 months? Select all that apply.

  • Cat. 1: Purchased goods & services
  • Cat. 2: Capital goods
  • Cat. 3: Fuel- & energy-related activities
  • Cat. 4: Upstream transportation & distribution
  • Cat. 5: Waste generated in operations
  • Cat. 6: Business travel
  • Cat. 7: Employee commuting
  • Cat. 8: Upstream leased assets
  • Cat. 9: Downstream transportation & distribution
  • Cat. 10: Processing of sold products
  • Cat. 11: Use of sold products
  • Cat. 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products
  • Cat. 13: Downstream leased assets
  • Cat. 14: Franchises
  • Cat. 15: Investments
  • None measured yet
  • Unsure
Q05
Opinion Scale

How would you rate our organization's current capability for collecting Scope 3 input data (e.g., spend data, activity data, supplier responses)?

Scale: 17
Min:No capabilityMax:Fully mature capability
Q06
Dropdown

Approximately what share of our annual spend is covered by supplier-provided emissions data?

  • 0–20%
  • 21–40%
  • 41–60%
  • 61–80%
  • 81–100%
  • Unsure / N/A
Q07
Dropdown

Who is primarily accountable for Scope 3 reporting outcomes in our organization?

  • Sustainability / ESG
  • CFO / Finance
  • COO / Operations
  • Chief Procurement Officer
  • Decentralized across business units
  • To be determined
  • Other
Q08
Long Text

Based on your responses throughout this survey, are there any risks, dependencies, or additional suggestions we should consider for our Scope 3 program?

Q09
Dropdown

Where is your role primarily based?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Global / Multi-region
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
Message

Thank you for your time—your responses have been recorded and will be used to inform our Scope 3 emissions roadmap. If you have any questions about this assessment, please contact the Sustainability team.

Q11
Dropdown

Which best describes our organization's current Scope 3 measurement status?

  • Not started
  • Planning and scoping
  • Piloting calculations in select categories
  • Regularly measuring some categories
  • Comprehensive measurement across material categories
  • Unsure
Q12
Multiple Choice

What support would most accelerate our initial Scope 3 efforts? Select all that apply.

  • Training on GHG Protocol Scope 3
  • Supplier outreach toolkit/templates
  • Dedicated budget or headcount
  • Executive sponsorship/mandate
  • Calculation/automation tool
  • Access to data lake/master data
  • External consultant support
  • Other
Q13
Dropdown

For the categories you selected above, how would you describe the overall depth of coverage?

  • Rough estimates using spend-based proxies only
  • Mix of spend-based and activity-based data
  • Mostly activity-based with some supplier-specific data
  • Primarily supplier-specific or measured data
  • Unsure / Not applicable
Q14
Opinion Scale

How would you rate our current capability for applying Scope 3 calculation methodologies (e.g., spend-based, activity-based, hybrid)?

Scale: 17
Min:No capabilityMax:Fully mature capability
Q15
Multiple Choice

Which emissions-related requests does our organization currently make of suppliers? Select all that apply.

  • Product carbon footprints
  • Site-level (facility) emissions
  • Third-party assurance/verification
  • Emissions reduction targets
  • Renewable energy usage
  • We do not ask for emissions data
  • Other
Q16
Dropdown

What is our organization's current plan for Scope 3 assurance or verification?

  • No assurance planned
  • Internal review only
  • Limited assurance this year
  • Reasonable assurance this year
  • Plan to seek assurance in the next 12 months
  • Not sure
Q17
AI Interview

Thank you for your input so far. We'd like to explore a few of your responses in more depth. An AI moderator will ask you up to 2 follow-up questions based on your answers.

Q18
Dropdown

How many years have you worked in areas related to Scope 3 or comparable sustainability reporting?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • More than 10 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
Dropdown

When do you expect our organization could begin external Scope 3 reporting?

  • Already reporting externally
  • Within 3 months
  • 3–6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • More than 12 months
  • No plans yet
Q20
Multiple Choice

Which data sources does our organization currently use for Scope 3 calculations? Select all that apply.

  • Spend or procurement data
  • Supplier-specific primary data
  • Product LCA studies
  • Industry averages/databases (e.g., ecoinvent)
  • Utility bills/energy data
  • Logistics shipment records
  • Travel provider reports
  • Waste hauler tickets
  • Other
Q21
Opinion Scale

How would you rate our current capability for using reporting systems and tools to consolidate and disclose Scope 3 data?

Scale: 17
Min:No capabilityMax:Fully mature capability
Q22
Multiple Choice

What would most increase supplier participation in emissions data sharing over the next 6–12 months? Select all that apply.

  • Standardized questionnaire and guidance
  • Co-funding or incentives for measurement
  • Contractual requirements or scorecards
  • Training webinars and office hours
  • Simple data submission portal
  • Recognition program for top performers
  • Other
Q23
Ranking

Rank the following activities by where you expect your team to focus the most effort over the next 12 months (highest effort first).

  1. Data collection and supplier outreach
  2. Calculation methodology and tools
  3. Internal training and capability building
  4. External reporting and disclosure
  5. Assurance and verification readiness
Drag to rank
Q24
Opinion Scale

How confident are you in the quality of our organization's current Scope 3 data?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Extremely confident
Q25
Opinion Scale

How would you rate the level of internal expertise and training available for Scope 3 measurement within our organization?

Scale: 17
Min:No capabilityMax:Fully mature capability
Q26
Dropdown

How often does our organization currently report Scope 3 emissions externally?

  • Not reporting externally
  • Ad hoc
  • Annually
  • Semiannually
  • Quarterly
Q27
Opinion Scale

How would you rate our current capability for verifying or assuring Scope 3 data (e.g., internal controls, audit trails, third-party review)?

Scale: 17
Min:No capabilityMax:Fully mature capability

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

Why this template

What this template is built to do — we found no directly comparable template from other survey tools to review.

What sets it apart

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview step that adaptively probes specific responses (e.g., data maturity or barriers) rather than relying on fixed follow-up questions
  • Covers the full Scope 3 readiness picture in one template: stakeholder involvement, measurement status, category-level depth, data sources, capability ratings across collection/calculation/tooling/expertise/verification, supplier engagement, and accountability/assurance ownership
  • Uses ranking and opinion-scale question types to quantify barriers, focus areas, and capability levels (data quality, methodology, tooling, expertise, verification) for structured cross-team comparison
  • Closes with an open-text risk/dependency summary plus role and tenure demographic questions, enabling segmentation of readiness by function and experience level

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
Sustainability & Impact

Electronics Repairability vs. Warranty Trade-off Study

Measures how consumer electronics buyers weigh repairability against warranty coverage in purchase decisions. Use this instrument to identify key purchase drivers, willingness-to-pay premiums for repairability features, and information-seeking behavior across demographic segments.

View template
Sustainability & Impact

Outage Notification & ETA Accuracy Satisfaction Survey

Measures residential utility customer satisfaction with outage notifications, estimated restoration time accuracy, and communication channel preferences. Designed for utility providers seeking to identify communication gaps and prioritize improvements.

View template
Sustainability & Impact

E-commerce ESG Double Materiality Assessment

Assess stakeholder-perceived importance and business impact of key ESG topics for e-commerce companies. Designed for double materiality mapping with internal and external stakeholders across multiple regions.

View template
Sustainability & Impact

Consumer Trust in Green Claims & Evidence Preferences

Measures consumer credibility perceptions of environmental claims, preferred evidence types, and greenwashing experiences to inform sustainability messaging strategy.

View template
Sustainability & Impact

Home Energy Upgrade Customer Experience Survey

Measures homeowner satisfaction across the full energy-upgrade journey—from site assessment through installation and rebate application—to identify improvement opportunities for program administrators and installers.

View template
Sustainability & Impact

Residential Demand Response Enrollment & Trade-Off Assessment

Measures utility customers' awareness, enrollment likelihood, incentive preferences, and acceptable trade-offs for demand response programs to inform program design and marketing strategy.

View template