Scope 3 GHG Emissions Readiness Assessment
Evaluates internal stakeholder readiness to measure and report Scope 3 supply chain emissions, identifying capability gaps, data maturity, supplier engagement levels, and barriers across functional teams.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Which areas are you involved in for Scope 3 work? Select all that apply.
- Sustainability / ESG
- Procurement / Supply chain
- Finance / Controllership
- Operations / Manufacturing
- IT / Data
- Product / Engineering
- Legal / Compliance
- Executive leadership
- Other
Rank the top barriers to initiating or advancing Scope 3 measurement (biggest barrier first).
- Limited data availability or access
- Low supplier response or engagement
- Lack of clear internal ownership
- Tools or IT capability gaps
- Budget or time constraints
Which Scope 3 categories has our organization measured or estimated in the last 12 months? Select all that apply.
- Cat. 1: Purchased goods & services
- Cat. 2: Capital goods
- Cat. 3: Fuel- & energy-related activities
- Cat. 4: Upstream transportation & distribution
- Cat. 5: Waste generated in operations
- Cat. 6: Business travel
- Cat. 7: Employee commuting
- Cat. 8: Upstream leased assets
- Cat. 9: Downstream transportation & distribution
- Cat. 10: Processing of sold products
- Cat. 11: Use of sold products
- Cat. 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products
- Cat. 13: Downstream leased assets
- Cat. 14: Franchises
- Cat. 15: Investments
- None measured yet
- Unsure
How would you rate our organization's current capability for collecting Scope 3 input data (e.g., spend data, activity data, supplier responses)?
Approximately what share of our annual spend is covered by supplier-provided emissions data?
- 0–20%
- 21–40%
- 41–60%
- 61–80%
- 81–100%
- Unsure / N/A
Who is primarily accountable for Scope 3 reporting outcomes in our organization?
- Sustainability / ESG
- CFO / Finance
- COO / Operations
- Chief Procurement Officer
- Decentralized across business units
- To be determined
- Other
Based on your responses throughout this survey, are there any risks, dependencies, or additional suggestions we should consider for our Scope 3 program?
Where is your role primarily based?
- Americas
- EMEA
- APAC
- Global / Multi-region
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for your time—your responses have been recorded and will be used to inform our Scope 3 emissions roadmap. If you have any questions about this assessment, please contact the Sustainability team.
Which best describes our organization's current Scope 3 measurement status?
- Not started
- Planning and scoping
- Piloting calculations in select categories
- Regularly measuring some categories
- Comprehensive measurement across material categories
- Unsure
What support would most accelerate our initial Scope 3 efforts? Select all that apply.
- Training on GHG Protocol Scope 3
- Supplier outreach toolkit/templates
- Dedicated budget or headcount
- Executive sponsorship/mandate
- Calculation/automation tool
- Access to data lake/master data
- External consultant support
- Other
For the categories you selected above, how would you describe the overall depth of coverage?
- Rough estimates using spend-based proxies only
- Mix of spend-based and activity-based data
- Mostly activity-based with some supplier-specific data
- Primarily supplier-specific or measured data
- Unsure / Not applicable
How would you rate our current capability for applying Scope 3 calculation methodologies (e.g., spend-based, activity-based, hybrid)?
Which emissions-related requests does our organization currently make of suppliers? Select all that apply.
- Product carbon footprints
- Site-level (facility) emissions
- Third-party assurance/verification
- Emissions reduction targets
- Renewable energy usage
- We do not ask for emissions data
- Other
What is our organization's current plan for Scope 3 assurance or verification?
- No assurance planned
- Internal review only
- Limited assurance this year
- Reasonable assurance this year
- Plan to seek assurance in the next 12 months
- Not sure
Thank you for your input so far. We'd like to explore a few of your responses in more depth. An AI moderator will ask you up to 2 follow-up questions based on your answers.
How many years have you worked in areas related to Scope 3 or comparable sustainability reporting?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–2 years
- 3–5 years
- 6–10 years
- More than 10 years
- Prefer not to say
When do you expect our organization could begin external Scope 3 reporting?
- Already reporting externally
- Within 3 months
- 3–6 months
- 6–12 months
- More than 12 months
- No plans yet
Which data sources does our organization currently use for Scope 3 calculations? Select all that apply.
- Spend or procurement data
- Supplier-specific primary data
- Product LCA studies
- Industry averages/databases (e.g., ecoinvent)
- Utility bills/energy data
- Logistics shipment records
- Travel provider reports
- Waste hauler tickets
- Other
How would you rate our current capability for using reporting systems and tools to consolidate and disclose Scope 3 data?
What would most increase supplier participation in emissions data sharing over the next 6–12 months? Select all that apply.
- Standardized questionnaire and guidance
- Co-funding or incentives for measurement
- Contractual requirements or scorecards
- Training webinars and office hours
- Simple data submission portal
- Recognition program for top performers
- Other
Rank the following activities by where you expect your team to focus the most effort over the next 12 months (highest effort first).
- Data collection and supplier outreach
- Calculation methodology and tools
- Internal training and capability building
- External reporting and disclosure
- Assurance and verification readiness
How confident are you in the quality of our organization's current Scope 3 data?
How would you rate the level of internal expertise and training available for Scope 3 measurement within our organization?
How often does our organization currently report Scope 3 emissions externally?
- Not reporting externally
- Ad hoc
- Annually
- Semiannually
- Quarterly
How would you rate our current capability for verifying or assuring Scope 3 data (e.g., internal controls, audit trails, third-party review)?
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Why this template
What this template is built to do — we found no directly comparable template from other survey tools to review.
What sets it apart
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview step that adaptively probes specific responses (e.g., data maturity or barriers) rather than relying on fixed follow-up questions
- Covers the full Scope 3 readiness picture in one template: stakeholder involvement, measurement status, category-level depth, data sources, capability ratings across collection/calculation/tooling/expertise/verification, supplier engagement, and accountability/assurance ownership
- Uses ranking and opinion-scale question types to quantify barriers, focus areas, and capability levels (data quality, methodology, tooling, expertise, verification) for structured cross-team comparison
- Closes with an open-text risk/dependency summary plus role and tenure demographic questions, enabling segmentation of readiness by function and experience level
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Electronics Repairability vs. Warranty Trade-off Study
Measures how consumer electronics buyers weigh repairability against warranty coverage in purchase decisions. Use this instrument to identify key purchase drivers, willingness-to-pay premiums for repairability features, and information-seeking behavior across demographic segments.
View templateOutage Notification & ETA Accuracy Satisfaction Survey
Measures residential utility customer satisfaction with outage notifications, estimated restoration time accuracy, and communication channel preferences. Designed for utility providers seeking to identify communication gaps and prioritize improvements.
View templateE-commerce ESG Double Materiality Assessment
Assess stakeholder-perceived importance and business impact of key ESG topics for e-commerce companies. Designed for double materiality mapping with internal and external stakeholders across multiple regions.
View templateConsumer Trust in Green Claims & Evidence Preferences
Measures consumer credibility perceptions of environmental claims, preferred evidence types, and greenwashing experiences to inform sustainability messaging strategy.
View templateHome Energy Upgrade Customer Experience Survey
Measures homeowner satisfaction across the full energy-upgrade journey—from site assessment through installation and rebate application—to identify improvement opportunities for program administrators and installers.
View templateResidential Demand Response Enrollment & Trade-Off Assessment
Measures utility customers' awareness, enrollment likelihood, incentive preferences, and acceptable trade-offs for demand response programs to inform program design and marketing strategy.
View template