Third-Party Risk Disclosure & Mitigation Survey Template

Evaluate clarity of third-party risk disclosures and mitigations across teams. Uncover gaps, strengthen vendor transparency, and drive compliance.

What's Included

AI-Powered Questions

Intelligent follow-up questions based on responses

Automated Analysis

Real-time sentiment and insight detection

Smart Distribution

Target the right audience automatically

Detailed Reports

Comprehensive insights and recommendations

Template Overview

Questions

AI-Powered

Smart Analysis

Ready-to-Use

Launch in Minutes

This professionally designed survey template helps you gather valuable insights with intelligent question flow and automated analysis.

Sample Survey Items

Multiple Choice

Which best describes your typical interaction with third-party risk disclosures?

I regularly review full disclosures and mitigation plans
I occasionally review full disclosures
I rely on summaries but not full disclosures
I do not review these

Dropdown

In the past 3 months, how often did you review vendor risk disclosures?

Not at all
Less than monthly
Monthly
Weekly
Daily

Multiple Choice

Where do you typically access third-party risk information? Select all that apply.

Email digests
GRC dashboard
Policy or vendor risk reports
Meeting briefings
Slack/Teams updates
Wiki/knowledge base
Other

Rating

How easy is it to locate key risk and mitigation details in the GRC dashboard (or your primary tool)?

Scale: 11 (star)

Min: Very hardMax: Very easy

Opinion Scale

In the last 3 months, how easy was it to find the current mitigation and residual risk for a specific vendor?

Range: 1 – 10

Min: Very hardMid: NeutralMax: Very easy

Matrix

How clear are the following elements in our third-party risk disclosures (past quarter)?

Rows	Very unclear	Somewhat unclear	Neutral	Somewhat clear	Very clear
Definition of risk categories	•	•	•	•	•
Severity/impact ratings	•	•	•	•	•
Mitigation steps and status	•	•	•	•	•
Residual risk after mitigation	•	•	•	•	•
Owner or responsible team	•	•	•	•	•
Next review or reassessment date	•	•	•	•	•

Rating

Overall, how plain-language are our risk write-ups and mitigation descriptions (past quarter)?

Scale: 11 (star)

Min: Jargon-heavyMax: Plain and clear

Opinion Scale

How visible is vendor risk status within the tools you use (e.g., dashboards, trackers)?

Range: 1 – 10

Min: Not visibleMid: Moderately visibleMax: Highly visible

Ranking

Rank the improvements that would be most helpful for clarity (drag to rank, top = most helpful).

Drag to order (top = most important)

Plain-language executive summary
Visual risk heatmap with legends
Mitigation plan with owners and due dates
Change history/changelog of risk posture
Links to detailed assessments and evidence

Q10

Multiple Choice

Which mitigation elements are hardest to interpret? Select all that apply.

Technical controls (e.g., encryption, segmentation)
Process changes or compensating controls
Timelines and milestones
Residual risk quantification
Ownership and escalation path
None — it’s clear
Other

Q11

Opinion Scale

If a vendor incident were reported today, how confident are you that you’d know the next steps?

Range: 1 – 10

Min: Not confidentMid: Moderately confidentMax: Very confident

Q12

Long Text

Please share one recent example (last 60 days) where clarity helped or hindered a decision.

Max 600 chars

Q13

Rating

Overall satisfaction with the clarity of third-party risk disclosures and mitigations (past quarter).

Scale: 11 (star)

Min: Very dissatisfiedMax: Very satisfied

Q14

Dropdown

What is your primary role?

Risk/GRC
Security
Procurement
Legal/Privacy
Engineering/IT
Finance
Operations
Executive
Other

Q15

Dropdown

What is your seniority level?

Individual contributor
Manager
Director
VP
C-level
Other

Q16

Dropdown

How long have you been in your current role?

<1 year
1–2 years
3–5 years
6–10 years
>10 years

Q17

Dropdown

Which region are you primarily based in?

Americas
EMEA
APAC
Other

Q18

Multiple Choice

Attention check: To confirm you are reading carefully, please select “Agree.”

Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly agree

Q19

Chat Message

Welcome! This short survey asks about the clarity and usefulness of third-party risk disclosures and mitigations. Please answer based on your experience in the past quarter.

Q20

Long Text

Any other feedback on making third-party risk disclosures clearer for you?

Max 600 chars

Q21

AI Interview

AI Interview: 2 Follow-up Questions on third-party risk clarity

AI InterviewLength: 2Personality: [Object Object]Mode: Fast

Q22

Chat Message

Thank you for your time—your input will help us improve how we communicate third-party risks and mitigations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is QuestionPunk?

QuestionPunk is a lightweight survey platform for live AI interviews you control. It's fast, flexible, and scalable—adapting every question in real time, moderating responses across languages, letting you steer prompts, models, and flows, and even generating surveys from a simple prompt. Get interview-grade insight with survey-level speed across qual and quant.

How do I create my first survey?

Sign up, then decide how you want to build: let the AI generate a survey from your prompt, pick a template, or start from scratch. Choose question types, set logic, and preview before sharing.

How can I share surveys with my team?

Send a project link so teammates can view and collaborate instantly.

Can the AI generate a survey from a prompt?

Yes. Provide a prompt and QuestionPunk drafts a survey you can tweak before sending.

How long does support typically take to reply?

We reply within 24 hours—often much sooner. Include key details in your message to help us assist you faster.

Can I export survey results?

Absolutely. Export results as CSV straight from the results page for quick data work.

Compliance