Collects structured stakeholder feedback on red-team risk coverage, report quality, and remediation follow-through to identify actionable program improvements across security, engineering, and leadership functions.
What's Included
AI-Powered Questions
Intelligent follow-up questions based on responses
Automated Analysis
Real-time sentiment and insight detection
Smart Distribution
Target the right audience automatically
Detailed Reports
Comprehensive insights and recommendations
Template Overview
33
Questions
AI-Powered
Smart Analysis
Ready-to-Use
Launch in Minutes
This professionally designed survey template helps you gather valuable insights with intelligent question flow and automated analysis.
Sample Survey Items
Q1
Chat Message
Welcome! This survey (approximately 7–10 minutes) asks about your experience with our red-team program over the past 12 months.
Your participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we want your honest perspective based on direct experience. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to improve the program.
Q2
Multiple Choice
Which best describes your primary involvement with red-team exercises in the past 12 months?
Consume findings to make decisions
Implement technical fixes
Defensive operations / blue team
Product or operations stakeholder
Compliance / governance
Executive / leadership sponsor
Other
Q3
Dropdown
Approximately how many red-team exercises have you directly engaged with in the past 12 months?
0 (aware but not directly engaged)
1–2
3–5
6–10
More than 10
Q4
Chat Message
The following questions ask how well red-team exercises covered key areas in the past 12 months. If you lack direct experience with an area, select the midpoint.
Q5
Opinion Scale
How well did red-team exercises cover application-layer security (web, mobile, APIs)?
Range: 1 – 5
Min: Not at all wellMid: NeutralMax: Extremely well
Q6
Opinion Scale
How well did red-team exercises cover infrastructure and cloud environments?
Range: 1 – 5
Min: Not at all wellMid: NeutralMax: Extremely well
Q7
Opinion Scale
How well did red-team exercises cover identity and access management (authentication/authorization)?
Range: 1 – 5
Min: Not at all wellMid: NeutralMax: Extremely well
Q8
Opinion Scale
How well did red-team exercises cover third-party and supply-chain risks?
Range: 1 – 5
Min: Not at all wellMid: NeutralMax: Extremely well
Q9
Opinion Scale
How well did red-team exercises cover social engineering and human factors?
Range: 1 – 5
Min: Not at all wellMid: NeutralMax: Extremely well
Q10
Opinion Scale
How well did red-team exercises cover physical security?
Range: 1 – 5
Min: Not at all wellMid: NeutralMax: Extremely well
Q11
Opinion Scale
Overall, how confident are you that red-teaming is currently focused on our highest-risk areas?
Range: 1 – 5
Min: Not at all confidentMid: NeutralMax: Extremely confident
Q12
Ranking
Please rank the following areas by where additional red-team focus would most reduce organizational risk over the next 6 months (top = highest priority).
Drag to order (top = most important)
Application layer (web, mobile, APIs)
Infrastructure and cloud
Identity and access management
Third parties and supply chain
Social engineering and human factors
Physical security
Q13
Multiple Choice
In your view, which specific areas are most under-tested relative to their potential business impact? (Select up to 3)
Crown-jewel applications
Secrets management
Privilege escalation paths
Data exfiltration routes
Human factors / social engineering
Third-party integrations
Cloud control plane
Lateral movement
Other (please specify)
Q14
Dropdown
What reporting cadence do you prefer for red-team results and trends?
After each exercise
Quarterly rollup
Biannual
Annual
On-demand only
Not sure
Q15
Ranking
Please rank the following elements of a red-team report from most to least valuable to your work.
Drag to order (top = most important)
Executive summary with business impact
Attack narrative / timeline
Evidence and impact detail
Reproduction steps / proof-of-concept
Exploitability / likelihood rationale
Prioritized remediation plan
Q16
Opinion Scale
Red-team reports are delivered in a timely manner relative to exercise completion.
Overall, how valuable are red-team findings to your work?
Range: 1 – 5
Min: Not at all valuableMid: NeutralMax: Extremely valuable
Q22
Opinion Scale
In your experience, how quickly are teams typically able to act on red-team findings after report delivery?
Range: 1 – 7
Min: Very slowlyMid: NeutralMax: Very quickly
Q23
Multiple Choice
What most commonly hinders follow-through on red-team findings? (Select up to 3)
Limited engineering bandwidth
Disagreement on risk or severity
Unclear ownership of findings
Tooling or visibility gaps
Vendor or third-party dependency
Competing priorities
Budget constraints
Other (please specify)
Q24
Long Text
Please share one example from the past 12 months where a red-team finding led to a meaningful improvement or fix. If none comes to mind, you may skip this question.
Max chars
Q25
Opinion Scale
How would you rate the overall maturity of our red-teaming program today?
Range: 1 – 5
Min: Very early stageMid: NeutralMax: Best-in-class
Q26
Long Text
If you could change one thing about the red-team program for the next cycle, what would it be?
Max chars
Q27
AI Interview
You've shared thoughts on improving the red-team program. Could you elaborate on what specific changes would have the greatest impact on your team's security posture?
AI InterviewLength: 2Personality: [Object Object]Mode: Fast
Reference questions: 5
Q28
Long Text
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions about the red-team program that we haven't covered.
Max chars
Q29
Multiple Choice
Which best describes your primary organizational function?
Engineering / Development
Security (including blue team)
IT / Infrastructure
Product / Operations
Compliance / Risk / GRC
Executive / Leadership
Other
Q30
Dropdown
What is your role level?
Individual contributor
Manager
Senior manager
Director
VP / C-level
Other / Prefer not to say
Q31
Dropdown
How long have you been in your current role at this organization?
Less than 1 year
1–2 years
3–5 years
6–10 years
More than 10 years
Q32
Dropdown
Where are you primarily located?
Americas
EMEA
APAC
Prefer not to say
Q33
Chat Message
Thank you for your time. Your input directly informs how we improve red-team coverage, reporting, and overall program impact.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is QuestionPunk?
QuestionPunk is an AI-powered survey and research platform that turns traditional surveys into adaptive conversations. Describe your research goal and get a complete survey draft, conduct AI-moderated interviews with dynamic follow-ups, detect low-quality responses, and produce insights automatically. It's fast, flexible, and scalable across qualitative and quantitative research.
How do I create my first survey?
Sign up, then choose how to build: describe your research goal and let AI generate a survey, pick a template, or start from scratch. Add question types, set logic, preview, and share.
Can the AI generate a survey from a prompt?
Yes. Describe your research goal in plain language and QuestionPunk drafts a complete survey with appropriate question types, ordering, and AI follow-up logic. You can then customize before publishing.
What question types are available?
QuestionPunk supports a wide range of question types: opinion scale, rating, multiple choice, dropdown, ranking, matrix, constant sum, AI interview (text and audio), long text, short text, email, phone, date, address, website, numeric, audio/video recording, contact form, chat message, conversation reset, button, page breaks, and more.
How do AI interviews work?
AI interviews conduct adaptive conversations with respondents. The AI asks follow-up questions based on what the respondent says, probing for clarity and depth. You control the personality, tone, model (Haiku, Sonnet, or Opus), and question mode (fixed count, AI decides when to stop, or time-based).
Can I test my survey before launching?
Yes. Use synthetic testing to create AI personas and run them through your survey. This helps catch issues with question flow, logic, and wording before real respondents see it.
How many languages are supported?
QuestionPunk supports 142+ languages. Add languages from the survey editor, auto-translate questions, and share language-specific links. AI interviews also adapt to the respondent's language automatically.
How can I share my survey?
Share via a direct link (with optional custom slug), embed on your website (iframe or script), distribute through Prolific for research panels, or generate a QR code for physical distribution.
Can I export survey results?
Yes. Export as CSV (flat or wide layout), Excel (XLSX), or export the survey structure as PDF/Word. Filter by suspicious level, response type, language, or date range before exporting.
Does QuestionPunk detect fraudulent responses?
Yes. Every response is automatically classified with a suspicious level (low/medium/high) based on attention checks, response timing, and behavioral signals. You can filter flagged responses in the Responses tab.
What are the pricing plans?
Basic (Free): 20 responses/month. Business ($50/month or $500/year): 5,000 responses/month with priority support. Enterprise (Custom): unlimited responses, remove branding, custom domain, and dedicated support.
How long does support take to reply?
We reply within 24 hours, often much sooner. Include key details in your message to help us assist you faster.