All templates
AI & Technology

Red Team Program Effectiveness Assessment

Collects structured stakeholder feedback on red-team risk coverage, report quality, and remediation follow-through to identify actionable program improvements across security, engineering, and leadership functions.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

33 questions · ~14 min
Q01
Message

Welcome! This survey (approximately 14 minutes) asks about your experience with our red-team program over the past 12 months. Your participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we want your honest perspective based on direct experience. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to improve the program.

Q02
Multiple Choice

Which best describes your primary involvement with red-team exercises in the past 12 months?

  • Consume findings to make decisions
  • Implement technical fixes
  • Defensive operations / blue team
  • Product or operations stakeholder
  • Compliance / governance
  • Executive / leadership sponsor
  • Other
Q03
Message

The following questions ask how well red-team exercises covered key areas in the past 12 months. If you lack direct experience with an area, select the midpoint.

Q04
Dropdown

What reporting cadence do you prefer for red-team results and trends?

  • After each exercise
  • Quarterly rollup
  • Biannual
  • Annual
  • On-demand only
  • Not sure
Q05
Opinion Scale

In your experience, how quickly are teams typically able to act on red-team findings after report delivery?

Scale: 17
Min:Very slowlyMax:Very quickly
Q06
Opinion Scale

How would you rate the overall maturity of our red-teaming program today?

Scale: 15
Min:Very early stageMax:Best-in-class
Q07
Long Text

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions about the red-team program that we haven't covered.

Q08
Multiple Choice

Which best describes your primary organizational function?

  • Engineering / Development
  • Security (including blue team)
  • IT / Infrastructure
  • Product / Operations
  • Compliance / Risk / GRC
  • Executive / Leadership
  • Other
Q09
Message

Thank you for your time. Your input directly informs how we improve red-team coverage, reporting, and overall program impact.

Q10
Dropdown

Approximately how many red-team exercises have you directly engaged with in the past 12 months?

  • 0 (aware but not directly engaged)
  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • More than 10
Q11
Opinion Scale

How well did red-team exercises cover application-layer security (web, mobile, APIs)?

Scale: 15
Min:Not at all wellMax:Extremely well
Q12
Ranking

Please rank the following elements of a red-team report from most to least valuable to your work.

  1. Executive summary with business impact
  2. Attack narrative / timeline
  3. Evidence and impact detail
  4. Reproduction steps / proof-of-concept
  5. Exploitability / likelihood rationale
  6. Prioritized remediation plan
Drag to rank
Q13
Multiple Choice

What most commonly hinders follow-through on red-team findings? (Select up to 3)

  • Limited engineering bandwidth
  • Disagreement on risk or severity
  • Unclear ownership of findings
  • Tooling or visibility gaps
  • Vendor or third-party dependency
  • Competing priorities
  • Budget constraints
  • Other (please specify)
Q14
Long Text

If you could change one thing about the red-team program for the next cycle, what would it be?

Q15
Dropdown

What is your role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • Manager
  • Senior manager
  • Director
  • VP / C-level
  • Other / Prefer not to say
Q16
Opinion Scale

How well did red-team exercises cover infrastructure and cloud environments?

Scale: 15
Min:Not at all wellMax:Extremely well
Q17
Opinion Scale

Red-team reports are delivered in a timely manner relative to exercise completion.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q18
Long Text

Please share one example from the past 12 months where a red-team finding led to a meaningful improvement or fix. If none comes to mind, you may skip this question.

Q19
AI Interview

You've shared thoughts on improving the red-team program. Could you elaborate on what specific changes would have the greatest impact on your team's security posture?

Q20
Dropdown

How long have you been in your current role at this organization?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • More than 10 years
Q21
Opinion Scale

How well did red-team exercises cover identity and access management (authentication/authorization)?

Scale: 15
Min:Not at all wellMax:Extremely well
Q22
Opinion Scale

Red-team reports clearly communicate business impact alongside technical findings.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q23
Dropdown

Where are you primarily located?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
Opinion Scale

How well did red-team exercises cover third-party and supply-chain risks?

Scale: 15
Min:Not at all wellMax:Extremely well
Q25
Opinion Scale

Remediation recommendations in red-team reports are specific and actionable.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q26
Opinion Scale

How well did red-team exercises cover social engineering and human factors?

Scale: 15
Min:Not at all wellMax:Extremely well
Q27
Opinion Scale

Red-team reports contain the right level of technical detail for my needs.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q28
Opinion Scale

How well did red-team exercises cover physical security?

Scale: 15
Min:Not at all wellMax:Extremely well
Q29
Opinion Scale

Findings in red-team reports are prioritized effectively by risk severity.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q30
Opinion Scale

Overall, how confident are you that red-teaming is currently focused on our highest-risk areas?

Scale: 15
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Extremely confident
Q31
Opinion Scale

Overall, how valuable are red-team findings to your work?

Scale: 15
Min:Not at all valuableMax:Extremely valuable
Q32
Ranking

Please rank the following areas by where additional red-team focus would most reduce organizational risk over the next 6 months (top = highest priority).

  1. Application layer (web, mobile, APIs)
  2. Infrastructure and cloud
  3. Identity and access management
  4. Third parties and supply chain
  5. Social engineering and human factors
  6. Physical security
Drag to rank
Q33
Multiple Choice

In your view, which specific areas are most under-tested relative to their potential business impact? (Select up to 3)

  • Crown-jewel applications
  • Secrets management
  • Privilege escalation paths
  • Data exfiltration routes
  • Human factors / social engineering
  • Third-party integrations
  • Cloud control plane
  • Lateral movement
  • Other (please specify)

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
AI & Technology

AI Bug Bounty: Scope, Fairness & Incentive Evaluation

An internal stakeholder survey evaluating scope clarity, decision fairness, and incentive effectiveness in your AI bug bounty program over the past 6 months to guide program improvements.

View template
AI & Technology

AI Model Card Usability & Developer Trust Survey

Measures how ML/AI practitioners engage with model cards, evaluate documented limitations, and how documentation quality shapes trust and adoption decisions across deployment contexts.

View template
AI & Technology

AI Governance & Risk Controls Readiness Assessment

Measures organizational readiness across AI policy clarity, approval workflows, risk tiering, and control maturity. Designed for cross-functional teams involved in AI development, deployment, or oversight.

View template
AI & Technology

AI Disclosure & Transparency Expectations Survey

Measures consumer expectations for AI transparency across products and services, capturing preferred disclosure methods, acceptability thresholds, and trust drivers to inform product labeling and policy decisions.

View template
AI & Technology

Entertainment Chatbot Engagement & Satisfaction Survey

Measures how often people use an entertainment chatbot (companionship, roleplay, humor, storytelling), what keeps them coming back, and where the experience falls flat — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a specific memorable conversation to surface what actually made it feel fun, believable, or disappointing. Built for product and content teams shipping character or entertainment-focused AI experiences.

View template
AI & Technology

Participant Comfort with AI Interviewers — Longitudinal Tracking Survey

A repeated-measures survey template designed to track how participant comfort, trust, and naturalness perceptions of AI interviewers evolve across multiple sessions. Administer at each study wave with consistent scaling to enable within-subjects change analysis.

View template