All Templates

Red Team Feedback Survey Template: Risk Coverage & Reporting

Use this survey template to collect stakeholder feedback on red team coverage, reporting quality, and actionability. Prioritize fixes and strengthen security.

What's Included

AI-Powered Questions

Intelligent follow-up questions based on responses

Automated Analysis

Real-time sentiment and insight detection

Smart Distribution

Target the right audience automatically

Detailed Reports

Comprehensive insights and recommendations

Sample Survey Items

Q1
Chat Message
Welcome! This short survey (about 7–10 minutes) asks about your experience with our red-team program over the past 12 months. Your responses are confidential and will be aggregated to improve the program. Please answer based on your direct experience.
Q2
Multiple Choice
Which best describes your primary involvement with red-team exercises in the past 12 months?
  • Consume findings to make decisions
  • Implement technical fixes
  • Defensive operations/blue team
  • Product or operations stakeholder
  • Compliance/governance
  • Executive/leadership sponsor
  • Other
Q3
Numeric
Approximately how many red-team exercises have you directly engaged with in the past 12 months?
Accepts a numeric value
Whole numbers only
Q4
Matrix
In the past 12 months, how well did red-team exercises cover the following areas?
RowsNot coveredLightly coveredModerately coveredHeavily coveredDon't know
Application layer (web/mobile/services)•••••
Infrastructure & cloud•••••
Identity & access (authn/authz)•••••
Third parties & supply chain•••••
Social engineering•••••
Physical security•••••
Q5
Opinion Scale
Overall, how confident are you that red-teaming is focusing on our highest-risk areas?
Range: 1 – 10
Min: Not confidentMid: NeutralMax: Very confident
Q6
Constant Sum
Allocate 100 points to the areas where additional red-team focus would most reduce risk over the next 6 months.
Total must equal 100
  • Application layer (web/mobile/services)
  • Infrastructure & cloud
  • Identity & access (authn/authz)
  • Third parties & supply chain
  • Social engineering
  • Physical security
Min per option: 0Whole numbers only
Q7
Multiple Choice
Which areas seem under-tested relative to their potential impact? (Select up to 3)
  • Crown-jewel applications
  • Secrets management
  • Privilege escalation paths
  • Data exfiltration routes
  • Human factors/social engineering
  • Third-party integrations
  • Cloud control plane
  • Lateral movement
Q8
Dropdown
What reporting cadence do you prefer for red-team results and trends?
  • After each exercise
  • Quarterly rollup
  • Biannual
  • Annual
  • On-demand only
  • Not sure
Q9
Ranking
Rank the most valuable elements of a red-team report (top = most valuable).
Drag to order (top = most important)
  1. Executive summary with business impact
  2. Attack narrative/timeline
  3. Evidence and impact detail
  4. Reproduction steps / POCs
  5. Exploitability/likelihood rationale
  6. Prioritized remediation plan
Q10
Matrix
Please rate your agreement with the following statements about our red-team reporting.
RowsStrongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agree
Findings are clear and unambiguous•••••
Severity and likelihood are well justified•••••
Risks are mapped to business outcomes•••••
Owners and action items are explicit•••••
Remediation timelines are realistic•••••
Metrics are consistent across exercises•••••
Q11
Rating
Overall, how valuable are red-team findings to your work?
Scale: 10 (star)
Min: Low valueMax: High value
Q12
Opinion Scale
How quickly can teams act on red-team findings after report delivery?
Range: 1 – 10
Min: Very slowMid: ModerateMax: Very fast
Q13
Multiple Choice
What most hinders follow-through on red-team findings?
  • Limited engineering bandwidth
  • Disagreement on risk/severity
  • Unclear ownership
  • Tooling or visibility gaps
  • Vendor or third-party dependency
  • Competing priorities
  • Budget constraints
Q14
Long Text
Please share one example from the past 12 months where a red-team finding led to a meaningful improvement or fix.
Max 600 chars
Q15
Multiple Choice
Attention check: To confirm you are reading the questions, please select "Blue" below.
  • Red
  • Green
  • Blue
  • Yellow
Q16
Opinion Scale
How mature is our red-teaming program today?
Range: 1 – 10
Min: Very earlyMid: EstablishedMax: Best-in-class
Q17
Short Text
If you could change one thing for the next cycle, what would it be?
Max 100 chars
Q18
Multiple Choice
Which best describes your primary function?
  • Engineering/Development
  • Security (including blue team)
  • IT/Infrastructure
  • Product/Operations
  • Compliance/Risk/GRC
  • Executive/Leadership
  • Other
Q19
Dropdown
What is your role level?
  • Individual contributor
  • Manager
  • Senior manager
  • Director
  • VP/C-level
  • Other/Prefer not to say
Q20
Dropdown
How long have you been in your current role at this company?
  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • More than 10 years
Q21
Dropdown
Where are you primarily located?
  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
Multiple Choice
What is your typical work arrangement?
  • Onsite
  • Hybrid
  • Remote
  • Prefer not to say
Q23
Long Text
Any other comments or context you want to share?
Max 600 chars
Q24
AI Interview
AI Interview: 2 Follow-up Questions on Red-Teaming
AI InterviewLength: 2Personality: Expert InterviewerMode: Fast
Q25
Chat Message
Thank you for your time—your input directly informs how we improve red-teaming impact and reporting.

Ready to Get Started?

Launch your survey in minutes with this pre-built template

Use This TemplateBrowse More Templates