Q01
Message
All templatesEducation & Academic
End-of-Term Course & Instructor Evaluation
A structured end-of-term evaluation measuring student perceptions of instruction quality, course materials, workload, and pace. Designed for higher-education institutions seeking actionable feedback to improve course design and teaching effectiveness.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
26 questions · ~11 min
Q02
Multiple Choice
What is the primary format of this course?
- Lecture
- Seminar
- Lab/Studio
- Online (synchronous)
- Online (asynchronous)
- Hybrid
Q03
Opinion Scale
The instructor explained concepts clearly.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q04
Opinion Scale
How useful were the course materials (e.g., textbook, slides, readings) for learning key concepts?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all usefulMax:Extremely useful
Q05
Dropdown
In the last 4 weeks, approximately how many hours per week did you spend on this course (including class time and independent study)?
- Fewer than 3 hours
- 3–5 hours
- 6–9 hours
- 10–14 hours
- 15–19 hours
- 20–24 hours
- 25 or more hours
Q06
Opinion Scale
How satisfied are you with this course overall?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all satisfiedMax:Extremely satisfied
Q07
Long Text
What specific changes, if any, would most improve the teaching or course materials?
Q08
Multiple Choice
What is your current program level?
- Undergraduate (lower division)
- Undergraduate (upper division)
- Graduate (Master's)
- Graduate (Doctoral)
- Professional/Continuing education
Q09
Message
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback is valuable and will be used to improve future course offerings.
Q10
Dropdown
How often did you attend scheduled class sessions this term?
- Every session
- Most sessions
- About half
- Rarely
- Never
Q11
Opinion Scale
The instructor was well-prepared for class sessions.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q12
Multiple Choice
Which of the following resources did you use most often in the last 4 weeks? Select all that apply.
- Textbook
- Lecture slides
- Recorded videos
- Readings/articles
- Practice problems/quizzes
- Discussion boards
- Lab manuals
- Software/tools
- Instructor notes
- Other (please specify)
Q13
Multiple Choice
Compared with your expectations, the workload this term was…
- Much lighter than expected
- Slightly lighter than expected
- About right
- Slightly heavier than expected
- Much heavier than expected
Q14
Opinion Scale
How likely are you to recommend this course to a fellow student?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q15
Long Text
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about your experience in this course.
Q16
Multiple Choice
What is your current enrollment status?
- Full-time
- Part-time
- Non-degree/Auditing
Q17
Opinion Scale
The instructor encouraged student questions and participation.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q18
Opinion Scale
How easy was it to access course materials (e.g., links, platforms, files)?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q19
Opinion Scale
The pace of the course this term was…
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Much too slowMax:Much too fast
Q20
AI Interview
We'd like to learn more about your course experience. An AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions based on your responses.
Q21
Dropdown
What is your age group?
- Under 18
- 18–20
- 21–24
- 25–29
- 30–39
- 40–49
- 50+
- Prefer not to say
Q22
Opinion Scale
The instructor provided timely and helpful feedback on assignments.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q23
Multiple Choice
Which of the following best describes your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
Q24
Opinion Scale
Overall, how effective was the instructor in this course?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all effectiveMax:Extremely effective
Q25
Dropdown
Where are you primarily located while taking this course?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Latin America & Caribbean
- Middle East
- North America
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
Q26
Ranking
Rank the following teaching methods from most helpful to least helpful for your learning.
- Live demonstrations
- Group discussions
- Problem-solving exercises
- Lectures
- Peer review
- Real-world examples
Drag to rank
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview block that lets students elaborate on their ratings in their own words, going beyond fixed-choice questions
- Combines structured opinion-scale ratings on instructor clarity, preparation, feedback, and pace with a ranking question on teaching methods for richer, comparable data
- Captures workload and material-usage patterns (hours per week, resource usage in last 4 weeks, access ease) alongside satisfaction and NPS-style recommendation questions
- Pairs quantitative scoring with two open-text questions and an AI interview, then auto-generates a report — with a free tier and $50/mo Business plan (no academic-only tier)
Jotform
Student Course Evaluation Form TemplateA static, drag-and-drop form template covering standard course/instructor rating fields. It's built for quick deployment and customization within Jotform's broader form-builder ecosystem, but it doesn't dynamically follow up on student responses. Reporting is limited to Jotform's standard form-response views rather than an automated evaluation report.
What it does well
- Easy drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform's builder
- Likely integrates with Jotform's wider app/payment/notification ecosystem
- Quick to deploy for basic end-of-term feedback collection
Where it falls short
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing on open responses
- No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
- No published methodology for automated per-response quality scoring
QuestionPro
Course evaluation & improvement survey questions + Sample questionnaire templateThis page reads more as a guide with sample survey questions and a downloadable questionnaire than a ready-to-field interactive template. It's useful as a question-bank reference for building a course evaluation survey, but it doesn't demonstrate a live adaptive experience. Actual fielding would require assembling and configuring the questions within QuestionPro's survey platform.
What it does well
- Broad sample question bank covering multiple course-evaluation dimensions
- Backed by QuestionPro's established survey platform and analytics tools
- Useful as a reference/starting point for drafting evaluation questions
Where it falls short
- Presented as a question list/guide rather than a fielding-ready adaptive template
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI interview capability
- No transparent, published AI-prompt methodology
SurveyMonkey
Training Course Evaluation Template: Questions & Feedback GuideA standard static survey template aimed at training/course evaluation, backed by SurveyMonkey's mature survey infrastructure and analytics dashboards. It covers typical satisfaction and effectiveness questions but relies on fixed question flows rather than conversational follow-up. Framed generally for 'training' evaluation rather than specifically for higher-education instructor/course review.
What it does well
- Mature survey platform with established analytics and benchmarking
- Simple, familiar template structure for quick setup
- Wide integration options within SurveyMonkey's ecosystem
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI-driven follow-up questioning based on student answers
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task options
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt disclosure
SurveySparrow
Sample Course Evaluation Form Template | Collect Instructor FeedbackSurveySparrow's template uses its signature conversational, chat-style form UI, which can feel more engaging than a static grid of questions. However, this conversational styling is a fixed-script presentation layer, not an adaptive interview that reasons about individual answers. It's positioned as a general instructor-feedback template rather than one built for detailed workload/pace analysis with AI-generated reporting.
What it does well
- Conversational, chat-style presentation that may improve completion rates
- Mobile-friendly form design typical of SurveySparrow templates
- Established survey platform with reporting dashboards
Where it falls short
- Conversational UI is scripted, not adaptive AI-driven follow-up probing
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task functionality
- No automated per-response quality scoring or disclosed AI methodology
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Education & Academic
Capstone Project Support & Learning Outcomes Survey
Evaluates students' capstone project experiences—including mentorship quality, resource availability, skill development, and key challenges—to inform data-driven program improvement decisions.
View templateEducation & Academic
Student Campus Safety & Emergency Communications Assessment
Measures student perceptions of campus safety, emergency communication effectiveness, and awareness of support resources to inform institutional safety planning and resource allocation.
View templateEducation & Academic
Alumni Giving Intentions & Engagement Drivers Survey
Measures current students' and recent graduates' connection to their institution, giving likelihood and motivations, barriers to donation, and communication preferences to inform alumni relations and advancement strategy.
View templateEducation & Academic
Adjunct Faculty Experience & Compensation Survey
Measures adjunct and part-time instructor satisfaction across pay equity, institutional support, teaching resources, and scheduling predictability. Designed for higher education administrators seeking actionable data to improve adjunct working conditions.
View templateEducation & Academic
Remote & Hybrid Work Experience Survey: Productivity, Well-being & Engagement
Measures employee perceptions of productivity, well-being, collaboration, and engagement across remote, hybrid, and in-office arrangements. Use this instrument to identify burnout risk factors and inform flexible-work policy decisions.
View templateEducation & Academic
Teacher Job Application & Fit Screening Survey
Screens teaching candidates on certification, subject and grade-level fit, classroom experience, and job priorities before an in-person interview. Built for school and district hiring teams; the AI follow-up interview goes past rehearsed talking points to reconstruct how a candidate actually handled a real classroom challenge.
View template