OpenTelemetry Adoption & Readiness Assessment
Measures developer familiarity, adoption stage, blockers, and rollout priorities for OpenTelemetry across engineering teams to inform instrumentation strategy and resource planning.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Which best describes your primary role?
- Backend developer
- Frontend developer
- Full-stack developer
- Site Reliability Engineer / DevOps
- Data/ML engineer
- QA/Testing engineer
- Software architect / Tech lead
- Platform engineer
- Other (please specify)
Which observability tools have you used in the last 6 months? (Select all that apply.)
- Prometheus
- Grafana
- Jaeger
- OpenTelemetry SDK
- OpenTelemetry Collector
- Elastic APM
- Datadog
- New Relic
- Splunk Observability
- AWS X-Ray
- Azure Monitor
- Google Cloud Operations Suite
- None of the above
- Other (please specify)
Which best describes your organization's current OpenTelemetry adoption stage?
- Not considering
- Evaluating
- Piloting in one or a few services
- In limited production
- Broad production across services
What are the biggest blockers to adopting or expanding OpenTelemetry in your organization? (Select up to 5.)
- Limited time or competing priorities
- Unclear ROI / benefits
- Learning curve or lack of expertise
- Language or framework gaps
- Lack of organizational buy-in
- Tooling or integration maturity
- Data volume or storage cost concerns
- Performance overhead concerns
- Security/PII/governance concerns
- We're satisfied with current vendor tooling
- No need identified yet
- Other (please specify)
Which areas are your next targets for OpenTelemetry instrumentation in the next 6 months? (Select all that apply.)
- Java services
- Node.js services
- Python services
- Go services
- .NET services
- Mobile apps (iOS/Android)
- Browser RUM
- Databases
- Message brokers/streaming (e.g., Kafka)
- Serverless functions
- Batch/ETL workloads
- Other (please specify)
We'd like to understand more about your experience with observability and OpenTelemetry. An AI moderator will ask a few brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
How many years of professional software development experience do you have?
- 0–1
- 2–4
- 5–9
- 10–14
- 15+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey! Your responses are anonymous and will be used in aggregate to identify adoption patterns and prioritize improvements to the OpenTelemetry ecosystem.
What is your primary programming language for services you work on today?
- Java
- JavaScript/TypeScript
- Python
- Go
- C#/.NET
- C/C++
- Ruby
- PHP
- Rust
- Other (please specify)
- Prefer not to say
How familiar are you with OpenTelemetry concepts and components?
Approximately what percentage of your production services are currently instrumented with OpenTelemetry?
- 0%
- 1–10%
- 11–25%
- 26–50%
- 51–75%
- 76–99%
- 100%
- Not sure
Which of the following support resources would be most helpful for your OpenTelemetry adoption? (Select up to 3.)
- Official documentation improvements
- Language-specific getting-started guides
- Reference architectures and deployment patterns
- Hands-on workshops or training sessions
- Internal champions / OTel working group
- Vendor-neutral migration tooling
- Community forums or Slack channels
- Consulting or professional services
- Other (please specify)
How likely is your team or organization to adopt or expand OpenTelemetry usage in the next 6 months?
Based on your responses in this survey, if you could change one thing about OpenTelemetry or its ecosystem, what would it be?
Where are you primarily based?
- North America
- Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- Latin America
- Middle East
- Africa
- Other (please specify)
- Prefer not to say
Where do your production workloads run today? (Select all that apply.)
- Kubernetes
- Serverless (e.g., AWS Lambda, Azure Functions)
- Containers without an orchestrator
- Virtual machines (VMs)
- Bare metal
- PaaS (e.g., Heroku, App Engine)
- On-premises data center
- Hybrid or multi-cloud
Which OpenTelemetry components or capabilities are you using today, if any? (Select all that apply.)
- OTel SDKs (language libraries)
- OTel Collector (any deployment)
- OTLP export protocol
- Auto-instrumentation
- Manual instrumentation
- Semantic conventions
- Sampling configuration (e.g., tail-based)
- Not using OTel yet
Rank the following outcomes by how important they are to your organization's OpenTelemetry goals (most important first).
- Faster incident detection and response
- Better root-cause analysis
- Cross-service traceability
- Standardized telemetry across teams
- Vendor portability / avoiding lock-in
- Cost control and optimization
- Improved application performance
- Security/compliance visibility
Approximately how many employees are in your organization?
- 1–10
- 11–50
- 51–200
- 201–1,000
- 1,001–5,000
- 5,001–10,000
- 10,001+
- Prefer not to say
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview segment that adaptively probes each respondent's actual observability and OpenTelemetry experience, rather than relying only on fixed-choice questions
- Combines quantitative signals (opinion-scale familiarity and likelihood-to-adopt ratings, dropdown for percentage of services instrumented) with a ranking question to prioritize rollout outcomes and multiple-choice questions on blockers, support needs, and next instrumentation targets
- Closes with an open-text reflection question asking what respondents would change about OpenTelemetry, capturing qualitative detail a static form would miss
- Covers the full readiness picture in one flow — role, tech stack, current tools, adoption stage, blockers, and org demographics — feeding directly into instrumentation strategy and resource planning
SurveyMonkey
AI Readiness Assessment TemplateThis is a fielding-ready template but it assesses general organizational AI readiness, not OpenTelemetry or observability adoption specifically, so it would need substantial rewriting for this use case. It's useful as a structural reference for readiness-assessment question design.
What it does well
- Established survey platform with broad template library and easy distribution
- Likely includes standard readiness-assessment scaffolding (maturity stages, barriers) transferable across tech topics
Where it falls short
- Static questionnaire with no adaptive AI follow-up interviewing to probe individual responses
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
- Not domain-specific to OpenTelemetry/observability tooling, adoption stages, or instrumentation targets
SurveySparrow
Information Security Risk Assessment QuestionnaireA ready-to-field questionnaire aimed at a technical/engineering audience, which makes it a reasonable structural comparison, but it targets security risk assessment rather than observability tooling adoption. Its conversational chat-style format is a known SurveySparrow strength.
What it does well
- Conversational, chat-like question flow that can feel more engaging than a plain form
- Ready-to-field questionnaire targeted at technical/engineering respondents
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview or automated per-response quality scoring
- No voice AI interview capability
- Topic is security risk, not OpenTelemetry adoption stage, blockers, or rollout prioritization
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Open Source Contributor Experience & Governance Survey
Measures contribution path clarity, governance transparency, maintainer responsiveness, and improvement priorities for open-source projects. Designed for project maintainers seeking to improve contributor satisfaction and retention.
View templateDeveloper Open-Source License Compliance Experience Survey
Measures how developers navigate open-source license compliance, including confidence levels, tooling satisfaction, workflow clarity, and key barriers. Designed for engineering teams and developer-tool organizations seeking to improve compliance processes and SBOM adoption.
View templateSRE/DevOps On-Call Workload & Recovery Assessment
Measures on-call alert burden, interruption impact, recovery effectiveness, and compensation preferences across engineering teams to benchmark workload and identify actionable improvements to reduce burnout.
View templateDeveloper Latency Sensitivity & SLO Benchmarking Survey
Measures developer-perceived latency thresholds, tail-latency tolerance, and performance trade-off priorities by use case. Use it to benchmark acceptable response times, set data-informed SLOs and SLAs, and prioritize performance investments that align with what developers actually care about.
View templateEdge Computing Reliability & Incident Response Benchmark
Benchmarks edge SLO/SLA maturity, failure handling patterns, and release safeguards for DevOps, SRE, and platform engineering teams managing edge workloads.
View templateDevOps Reliability & Incident Response Assessment
Benchmarks uptime, incident response, on-call burden, error handling, and SLA priorities across engineering teams. Designed for SREs, DevOps engineers, and software developers managing production systems.
View template