Q01
Long Text
All templates
AI Bug Bounty: Scope, Fairness & Incentive Evaluation
An internal stakeholder survey evaluating scope clarity, decision fairness, and incentive effectiveness in your AI bug bounty program over the past 6 months to guide program improvements.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
25 questions · ~4 min
Q02
Multiple Choice
In what ways are you involved with the AI bug bounty program? (Select all that apply.)
Q03
Long Text
How clear are the program's overall objectives to you today?
Q04
Long Text
Thinking about the last 6 months, how fair overall have our bounty decisions been?
Q05
Multiple Choice
Which incentives most motivate high-quality submissions? (Select up to 3.)
Q06
Multiple Choice
Which changes would most improve fairness and clarity in the program? (Select up to 3.)
Q07
Long Text
How likely are you to recommend our AI bug bounty program to an external security researcher?
Q08
Long Text
How long have you worked at this company?
Q09
Long Text
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will directly inform improvements to scope clarity, evaluation fairness, and incentive design in the AI bug bounty program.
Q10
Long Text
How long have you been involved with or aware of the AI bug bounty program?
Q11
Long Text
How clear is the definition of which AI/ML assets and models are in scope?
Q12
Long Text
How consistent have severity classifications been across similar submissions?
Q13
Long Text
Please rank the following success metrics from most to least important for evaluating the program.
Q14
AI Interview
We'd like to explore your feedback in more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses about the bug bounty program.
Q15
Long Text
Which region do you primarily work in?
Q16
Long Text
How clear is the definition of which vulnerability types and AI-specific attack vectors qualify?
Q17
Long Text
How fair have payout amounts been relative to the effort and impact of submissions?
Q18
Long Text
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions for improving the AI bug bounty program.
Q19
Long Text
Approximately how many bounty reports have you personally reviewed in the last 6 months?
Q20
Long Text
How clear are the severity classification criteria and corresponding payout tiers?
Q21
Long Text
How timely and communicative has the triage process been?
Q22
Long Text
How clear are the out-of-scope exclusions and rules of engagement?
Q23
Long Text
How fairly have duplicate or disputed reports been handled?
Q24
Long Text
If any scope wording feels ambiguous or incomplete, please share specific examples or phrases you would improve.
Q25
Long Text
How adequate are current payout amounts relative to the effort and impact of submissions?
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.