Get stakeholder feedback on fairness, scope clarity, and incentive design in your AI bug bounty over the past 6 months to optimize program outcomes.
What's Included
AI-Powered Questions
Intelligent follow-up questions based on responses
Automated Analysis
Real-time sentiment and insight detection
Smart Distribution
Target the right audience automatically
Detailed Reports
Comprehensive insights and recommendations
Template Overview
22
Questions
AI-Powered
Smart Analysis
Ready-to-Use
Launch in Minutes
This professionally designed survey template helps you gather valuable insights with intelligent question flow and automated analysis.
Sample Survey Items
Q1
Multiple Choice
In what ways are you involved with the AI bug bounty program? (Select all that apply.)
Program owner/manager
Security/AppSec
Engineering/Platform
AI/ML
Legal/Compliance
Trust & Safety
Procurement/Vendor management
Product/UX
Executive sponsor
Not directly involved but aware
Q2
Dropdown
How long have you been involved with or aware of the program?
Less than 3 months
3–6 months
6–12 months
1–2 years
Over 2 years
Q3
Opinion Scale
How clear are the program’s objectives to you today?
Range: 1 – 10
Min: Not clearMid: Moderately clearMax: Very clear
Q4
Matrix
How clear is each aspect of the current scope?
Rows
Very unclear
Unclear
Neutral
Clear
Very clear
In-scope AI models/components
•
•
•
•
•
Data assets covered by scope
•
•
•
•
•
Expected testing methods
•
•
•
•
•
Prohibited activities
•
•
•
•
•
Reporting format requirements
•
•
•
•
•
Triage criteria and definitions
•
•
•
•
•
Q5
Long Text
Where is scope wording ambiguous or incomplete? Please share specific examples or phrases to improve.
Max 600 chars
Q6
Rating
Thinking about the last 6 months, how fair overall are our bounty decisions?
Scale: 11 (star)
Min: Very unfairMax: Very fair
Q7
Matrix
Rate fairness across these areas (last 6 months).
Rows
Very unfair
Somewhat unfair
Neutral
Somewhat fair
Very fair
Consistency of triage decisions
•
•
•
•
•
Alignment of payouts to impact
•
•
•
•
•
Transparency of decision rationale
•
•
•
•
•
Timeliness of reviewer feedback
•
•
•
•
•
Process for appeals/disputes
•
•
•
•
•
Q8
Opinion Scale
How adequate are current payouts for comparable effort and impact?
Range: 1 – 10
Min: Far too lowMid: About rightMax: Far too high
Q9
Multiple Choice
Which incentives most motivate high-quality submissions here? (Select up to 3.)
Cash bounties
Public recognition/leaderboard
Private recognition (internal kudos)
Swag/merchandise
Invitation-only access or beta programs
Faster coordinated disclosure timelines
Access to datasets/APIs/sandboxes
Higher severity multipliers/bonuses
Charity donation option
Q10
Constant Sum
Allocate 100 points across the incentives to reflect our current emphasis.
Total must equal 100
Min per option: 0Whole numbers only
Q11
Multiple Choice
Which changes would most improve fairness and clarity? (Select up to 3.)
Publish clearer severity examples
Share payout ranges by severity
Standardize triage SLAs
Provide a scope decision tree
Add public case studies
Introduce independent review for disputes
Expand test environment access
Increase frequency of scope updates
Q12
Ranking
Order these success metrics from most to least important.
Drag to order (top = most important)
Number of valid reports
Reduction in repeat issues
Time to triage
Time to fix
Researcher satisfaction
Severity‑weighted impact
Coverage across AI components
Q13
Rating
How likely are you to recommend our program to external researchers? (last 6 months)
Scale: 11 (star)
Min: Not at all likelyMax: Extremely likely
Q14
Long Text
Any other suggestions to improve fairness, scope clarity, or incentives?
Max 600 chars
Q15
Dropdown
How long have you worked at this company?
Less than 6 months
6–12 months
1–3 years
3–5 years
Over 5 years
Prefer not to say
Q16
Dropdown
Which region do you primarily work in?
North America
Latin America
Europe
Middle East
Africa
South Asia
East Asia
Southeast Asia
Oceania
Prefer not to say
Q17
Dropdown
Approximately how many bounty reports have you personally reviewed in the last 6 months?
0
1–5
6–20
21–50
51+
Not applicable
Q18
Multiple Choice
Attention check: To confirm you’re paying attention, please select “Agree”.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
Q19
Chat Message
Welcome! This brief internal survey focuses on fairness, scope, and incentives in our AI bug bounty program over the past 6 months.
Q20
Long Text
Any final comments or clarifications before you submit?
Max 600 chars
Q21
AI Interview
AI Interview: 2 Follow-up Questions on the AI Bug Bounty Program
AI InterviewLength: 2Personality: [Object Object]Mode: Fast
Q22
Chat Message
Thank you for your time—your input will help us improve fairness, scope clarity, and incentives.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is QuestionPunk?
QuestionPunk is a lightweight survey platform for live AI interviews you control. It's fast, flexible, and scalable—adapting every question in real time, moderating responses across languages, letting you steer prompts, models, and flows, and even generating surveys from a simple prompt. Get interview-grade insight with survey-level speed across qual and quant.
How do I create my first survey?
Sign up, then decide how you want to build: let the AI generate a survey from your prompt, pick a template, or start from scratch. Choose question types, set logic, and preview before sharing.
How can I share surveys with my team?
Send a project link so teammates can view and collaborate instantly.
Can the AI generate a survey from a prompt?
Yes. Provide a prompt and QuestionPunk drafts a survey you can tweak before sending.
How long does support typically take to reply?
We reply within 24 hours—often much sooner. Include key details in your message to help us assist you faster.
Can I export survey results?
Absolutely. Export results as CSV straight from the results page for quick data work.