All templates

Mixed-Methods Integration Quality Assessment

A team-level diagnostic for mixed-methods research projects, evaluating convergence, divergence, and integration rigor across qualitative and quantitative strands to guide analytic next steps.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

23 questions · ~4 min
Q01
Long Text

Welcome to this mixed-methods integration review. Your responses will help the team assess how well qualitative and quantitative strands converge and identify areas for improvement. Participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we value your honest assessment based on your direct experience with this project. Responses will be shared only within the project team in aggregate form. Estimated time: 10–12 minutes.

Q02
Multiple Choice

Which components of this study did you directly contribute to? Select all that apply.

Q03
Long Text

Overall, to what extent do the qualitative and quantitative results point to the same conclusions?

Q04
Long Text

How substantial were the discrepancies between the qualitative and quantitative findings in this project?

Q05
Long Text

How well were qualitative and quantitative strands integrated across stages (design, analysis, interpretation)?

Q06
Long Text

Rank the following sources by their influence on the study's final conclusions, from most to least influential.

Q07
Multiple Choice

Based on the current evidence, which next steps should the team take? Select all that apply.

Q08
AI Interview

We'd like to explore your perspective on the integration process in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your experience with this project.

Q09
Long Text

Based on your responses throughout this review, is there anything else the team should consider when interpreting or reporting the integrated results?

Q10
Long Text

How many years of experience do you have with mixed-methods research?

Q11
Long Text

Thank you for completing this review. Your input will directly strengthen the team's integrated conclusions and help guide next steps.

Q12
Long Text

How clear were the mixed-methods objectives at the study design stage?

Q13
Multiple Choice

Which strand—qualitative, quantitative, or both equally—contributed most to the study's key insights overall?

Q14
Multiple Choice

What types of discrepancies were present? Select all that apply.

Q15
Multiple Choice

Which integration techniques were used in this project? Select all that apply.

Q16
Long Text

How confident are you in the integrated conclusions of this study?

Q17
Multiple Choice

Which methodological training best describes your background? Select all that apply.

Q18
Multiple Choice

Which data sources were included in this integration? Select all that apply.

Q19
Long Text

Briefly describe one example of clear convergence (or near-convergence) you observed between the qualitative and quantitative findings.

Q20
Long Text

Describe the most consequential discrepancy you observed: what differed, and where it appeared.

Q21
Long Text

What, if any, barriers limited the integration of qualitative and quantitative strands?

Q22
Long Text

In which region are you primarily based? (Optional)

Q23
Long Text

Rank the following actions to address discrepancies from highest to lowest priority.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.