Employer Internship Program Evaluation Survey
Collects structured employer feedback on intern performance, program structure, supervision investment, and organizational outcomes to guide internship program improvements.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Did your organization host at least one intern in the past 12 months?
- Yes
- No
How many interns did your organization host in the past 12 months?
- 1
- 2–3
- 4–6
- 7–10
- 11–20
- More than 20
Overall, how would you rate the performance of your intern(s)?
On average, how many hours per week did your team spend supervising each intern?
- Less than 1 hour
- 1–2 hours
- 3–5 hours
- 6–10 hours
- 11–15 hours
- More than 15 hours
Did any of your intern(s) receive a return offer?
- Yes, full-time offer
- Yes, extended internship
- No
- Not applicable
Based on your responses in this survey, please share your thoughts on how the internship program could be improved. Feel free to discuss any skill gaps you observed, structural changes you would recommend, or anything else you think is relevant.
What is your organization's primary industry?
- Technology
- Professional services
- Manufacturing
- Healthcare
- Education
- Nonprofit
- Government
- Finance/Insurance
- Retail
- Other
How many years of experience do you have supervising interns?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–2 years
- 3–5 years
- 6–10 years
- More than 10 years
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback is valuable and will be used to improve future internship programs.
What is your role in relation to the internship program?
- Direct supervisor
- Team lead/Manager
- HR/Recruiting
- Program coordinator
- Executive
- Other
What was the typical duration of an internship at your organization?
- Less than 4 weeks
- 4–6 weeks
- 7–10 weeks
- 11–14 weeks
- 15–26 weeks
- More than 26 weeks
How would you rate your intern(s) on technical and job-specific skills?
Which of the following program elements did you use with interns? Select all that apply.
- Orientation session
- Assigned mentor
- Training workshops
- Regular check-ins
- Midpoint review
- Final presentation
- Social/networking events
- Written performance evaluation
- Other
Overall, what was the impact of the internship program on your organization?
Approximately how many employees does your organization have?
- 1–10
- 11–50
- 51–200
- 201–500
- 501–1,000
- 1,001–5,000
- 5,001+
Which work arrangements did your interns use? Select all that apply.
- In-person
- Remote
- Hybrid
- Varied by intern
- Other
How would you rate your intern(s) on communication skills?
Please rank the following activities by how much time your interns typically spent on each, from most time to least time.
- Project/assignment work
- Training and skill development
- Meetings and collaboration
- Shadowing and observation
- Administrative tasks
- Networking and social activities
How likely is your organization to host interns again in the next 12 months?
Where is your organization primarily located?
- United States
- Canada
- United Kingdom
- European Union
- India
- Australia/New Zealand
- Other
How would you rate your intern(s) on initiative and self-direction?
Which best describes your organization type?
- Private company
- Public company
- Startup
- Nonprofit
- Government
- Other
How would you rate your intern(s) on professionalism and reliability?
How prepared were the intern(s) for their assigned tasks at the start of the internship?
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Combines structured employer inputs (program duration, work arrangement, supervision hours, program elements) with multi-dimensional intern performance ratings across technical skill, communication, initiative, and professionalism
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that asks tailored questions based on the employer's own earlier answers, rather than relying only on static open-text boxes
- Captures organizational outcomes directly tied to program ROI, such as return offers, overall program impact, and likelihood to host interns again
- Segments respondents by industry, organization size, location, and supervisor experience, enabling benchmarking that a single generic form can't support
Jotform
Bible College Camp Internship Evaluation Form TemplateThis is a static, fielding-ready form built for a very specific use case: evaluating camp-ministry interns at a Bible college, not general corporate internship programs. It's a good example of Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder but the content (fields, tone, scope) would need heavy rework for an employer-side business evaluation.
What it does well
- Ready-to-use drag-and-drop form builder with easy customization
- Part of a large Jotform template library with related evaluation forms
- Likely supports basic conditional logic and integrations with other Jotform tools
Where it falls short
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up or probing based on prior answers
- No voice-based interview option or automated per-response quality scoring
- Built for a niche academic/ministry context, not general employer internship program evaluation
SurveySparrow
Summer Internship Evaluation Form TemplateA fielding-ready template aimed at evaluating summer interns, likely from an education or mentor perspective rather than a full employer-side operational review. It covers general performance ratings but appears lighter on program-structure and organizational-outcome questions.
What it does well
- Conversational, mobile-friendly survey format that SurveySparrow is known for
- Ready to deploy without building from scratch
- Likely includes standard rating-scale questions for intern performance
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe vague or interesting responses
- No voice AI interview or screen-share guided task options
- No transparent, published prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of responses
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Informed Consent Comprehension Assessment
A pre-study instrument that verifies participants' understanding of consent information, risks, and withdrawal rights. Designed for IRB compliance and suitable for any human subjects research protocol.
View templateEducator AI Adoption, Policy & Classroom Impact Survey
Measures educators' AI tool usage patterns, institutional policy clarity, observed classroom outcomes, and support needs to inform evidence-based AI integration strategies across K-12 and higher education contexts.
View templateFinancial Aid Application Experience Survey
Measures student perceptions of financial aid application clarity, fairness, and support quality. Designed for higher-education institutions seeking actionable feedback from applicants and non-applicants within the past 12 months.
View templateAI in Coursework: Student Integrity & Policy Attitudes
Measures student attitudes toward AI tool usage in academic settings, integrity concerns, and preferred institutional safeguards. Designed for higher-education administrators and faculty seeking data to inform responsible AI-use policies.
View templateCapstone Project Support & Learning Outcomes Survey
Evaluates students' capstone project experiences—including mentorship quality, resource availability, skill development, and key challenges—to inform data-driven program improvement decisions.
View templateAcademic Integrity Climate Survey for Students
Measures student awareness of academic integrity policies, perceived peer norms around misconduct, and views on institutional interventions. Designed for education administrators and researchers seeking actionable data to strengthen integrity culture.
View template