All templates
Developer & Engineering

API Deprecation & Migration Experience Survey

Measures developer sentiment toward API deprecation timelines, guidance clarity, and migration burden to inform improvements in API lifecycle communication and support practices.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

22 questions · ~10 min
Q01
Message

Welcome to the API Deprecation & Migration Experience Survey. This survey explores your experience with API or platform deprecations, including timeline fairness, guidance quality, and migration effort. Your responses will help improve how deprecations are communicated and managed. Participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. Estimated time: 6–8 minutes.

Q02
Multiple Choice

When did you most recently encounter an API or platform deprecation that affected your work?

  • In the last 30 days
  • 31–90 days ago
  • 3–6 months ago
  • 7–12 months ago
  • Over 12 months ago
  • I have not encountered one
Q03
Multiple Choice

Was a specific removal or sunset date provided for the deprecation?

  • Yes, a specific date
  • No, only general timing (e.g., 'later this year')
  • Not sure / wasn't stated
Q04
Opinion Scale

How clear was the deprecation guidance you received (e.g., migration documentation, changelogs)?

Scale: 17
Min:Very unclearMax:Very clear
Q05
Opinion Scale

How much effort did the migration require for your codebase?

Scale: 17
Min:Minimal effortMax:Extreme effort
Q06
Multiple Choice

Where did you first learn about the deprecation?

  • Email notification
  • In-product banner or console
  • Release notes or changelog
  • API response headers or warnings
  • Documentation site
  • Social media or community post
  • Colleague or internal announcement
  • I don't recall
Q07
Dropdown

What is your primary role?

  • Backend engineer
  • Frontend engineer
  • Full-stack engineer
  • Mobile engineer
  • DevOps / SRE
  • Data / ML engineer
  • Architect
  • Engineering manager
  • Product manager
  • Other
Q08
Long Text

Based on your responses in this survey, what would make deprecation timelines and guidance clearer and fairer for you?

Q09
Dropdown

Who initiated the deprecation you most recently experienced?

  • Cloud platform provider
  • SaaS or API vendor
  • Open-source project maintainers
  • Internal team at my company
  • Hardware/device vendor
  • Not sure
Q10
Dropdown

Approximately how many weeks of advance notice were you given before the deprecation took effect?

  • Less than 1 week
  • 1–2 weeks
  • 3–4 weeks
  • 5–8 weeks
  • 9–12 weeks
  • 13–26 weeks (3–6 months)
  • More than 26 weeks (6+ months)
  • Not sure
Q11
Opinion Scale

How would you rate the clarity of step-by-step migration instructions?

Scale: 17
Min:Very poorMax:Excellent
Q12
Ranking

Rank the following pain points from most to least impactful during your deprecation and migration experience.

  1. Understanding what changed
  2. Planning the migration timeline
  3. Refactoring code
  4. Updating dependencies
  5. Testing and validation
  6. Coordinating across teams
Drag to rank
Q13
Opinion Scale

After this deprecation experience, how did your trust in the vendor or provider change?

Scale: 17
Min:Decreased significantlyMax:Increased significantly
Q14
Dropdown

How many years of professional software development experience do you have?

  • Less than 1
  • 1–3
  • 4–6
  • 7–10
  • 11–15
  • 16+
Q15
AI Interview

We'd like to explore your deprecation experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.

Q16
Opinion Scale

Overall, how fair was the deprecation timeline you experienced?

Scale: 17
Min:Very unfairMax:Very fair
Q17
Opinion Scale

How would you rate the quality of code examples or migration guides provided?

Scale: 17
Min:Very poorMax:Excellent
Q18
Dropdown

Approximately how many employees does your organization have?

  • 1–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–5,000
  • 5,001–10,000
  • 10,001+
Q19
Message

Thank you for your time — your feedback will directly inform how we improve deprecation practices and developer experience.

Q20
Dropdown

What is the minimum number of weeks of advance notice you consider fair for breaking API changes?

  • Less than 1 week
  • 1–2 weeks
  • 3–4 weeks
  • 5–8 weeks
  • 9–12 weeks
  • 13–26 weeks (3–6 months)
  • More than 26 weeks (6+ months)
Q21
Opinion Scale

How would you rate the completeness of the breaking-changes documentation?

Scale: 17
Min:Very poorMax:Excellent
Q22
Dropdown

Which region are you primarily based in?

  • North America
  • Latin America
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • East Asia
  • South Asia
  • Southeast Asia
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

Why this template

What this template is built to do — we found no directly comparable template from other survey tools to review.

What sets it apart

  • Combines structured questions (timeline fairness, notice period, documentation clarity, migration effort) with an adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe the specific pain points a respondent flags, rather than relying only on fixed-choice answers
  • Includes a dedicated ranking question to force prioritization of pain points and multiple opinion-scale items covering guidance clarity, code example quality, and documentation completeness so results are directly actionable for API/dev-relations teams
  • Captures respondent context (role, years of experience, org size, region) enabling segmentation of migration-burden feedback by developer seniority or company size
  • Closes with an open-text reflection question plus an AI-moderated follow-up interview, giving both quantifiable scores and rich qualitative detail on what would make deprecation timelines and support better

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
Developer & Engineering

Project Management Software Usage & Satisfaction Survey

Measures how teams actually use their project management tool day to day — adoption, feature-level satisfaction, and the friction points that drive people back to spreadsheets — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a specific recent workflow moment instead of general sentiment. Built for product, IT, and operations teams evaluating or renewing tools.

View template
Developer & Engineering

Software Developer Performance Review & Growth Survey

A structured performance check-in for software engineers that pairs self-rated competency scores, behavioral frequency questions, and a priority trade-off exercise with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the developer's biggest blocker and lowest-rated skill area for concrete, specific detail managers can use in 1:1s and growth plans.

View template
Developer & Engineering

Software Update Rollout Feedback Survey

Captures how a specific software release landed with users — installation friction, stability, performance, and which features actually helped — for product and engineering teams shipping regular updates. The AI follow-up interview reconstructs exactly what broke or slowed someone down instead of settling for a vague 'it had bugs.'

View template
Developer & Engineering

Software Tool Evaluation & Adoption Fit Survey

Captures how a software tool actually performed during a trial, pilot, or proof-of-concept — usability, integrations, support, and value for cost — and ranks which factors matter most to the decision. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the real story behind the adoption call, including near-misses and blockers. Built for engineering, IT, and product teams running a formal tool evaluation.

View template
Developer & Engineering

API/SDK Migration Readiness & Blockers Assessment

Assess developer teams' API and SDK migration status, identify top blockers, and surface support needs to plan lower-risk, faster upgrades.

View template
Developer & Engineering

SRE/DevOps On-Call Workload & Recovery Assessment

Measures on-call alert burden, interruption impact, recovery effectiveness, and compensation preferences across engineering teams to benchmark workload and identify actionable improvements to reduce burnout.

View template