Q01
Message
All templatesEducation & Academic
Adjunct Faculty Experience & Compensation Survey
Measures adjunct and part-time instructor satisfaction across pay equity, institutional support, teaching resources, and scheduling predictability. Designed for higher education administrators seeking actionable data to improve adjunct working conditions.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
26 questions · ~11 min
Q02
Multiple Choice
Which of the following best describes your current teaching appointment?
- Adjunct or part-time instructor
- Full-time non-tenure track
- Tenure-track or tenured
- Graduate TA/Instructor
- Multiple roles (including adjunct)
- Other
Q03
Opinion Scale
Overall, how satisfied are you with your adjunct or part-time teaching experience this term?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q04
Opinion Scale
How responsive has your department or program been to your questions or requests this term?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all responsiveMax:Extremely responsive
Q05
Opinion Scale
How would you rate the fairness of your compensation relative to your workload this term?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very unfairMax:Very fair
Q06
Opinion Scale
How satisfied are you with the technology and learning management system (LMS) available for your courses?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q07
Ranking
Please rank the following areas from most to least in need of improvement for adjunct instructors at your institution.
- Compensation and benefits
- Course scheduling predictability
- Communication from department
- Access to teaching resources
- Recognition and respect
Drag to rank
Q08
Multiple Choice
What type of institution are you teaching at this term?
- Public 2-year (community/technical college)
- Public 4-year university
- Private nonprofit
- Private for-profit
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q09
Message
Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are confidential and will be used to inform improvements for adjunct and part-time instructors at your institution. We appreciate your time and honest feedback.
Q10
Dropdown
How many courses are you teaching this term?
- 0 (not currently teaching)
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5 or more
Q11
Opinion Scale
At the start of this term, how prepared did you feel to teach your assigned course(s)?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all preparedMax:Very well prepared
Q12
Opinion Scale
How satisfied are you with the onboarding or orientation support you received for your current course(s)?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q13
Opinion Scale
How satisfied are you with your per-course pay rate?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q14
Opinion Scale
How satisfied are you with the course materials and curriculum support provided to you?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q15
AI Interview
Based on your responses throughout this survey, what is the single most important change that would improve your experience as an adjunct instructor? Please share your thoughts and the moderator will ask a few brief follow-up questions.
Q16
Dropdown
How long have you taught in an adjunct or part-time capacity in total?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–2 years
- 3–5 years
- 6–10 years
- 11–15 years
- 16–20 years
- More than 20 years
Q17
Opinion Scale
How satisfied are you with access to mentoring or peer support from other faculty?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q18
Opinion Scale
How satisfied are you with your access to benefits (e.g., health insurance, retirement)?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q19
Opinion Scale
How satisfied are you with your physical workspace or classroom facilities?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q20
Multiple Choice
What is your primary broad discipline area?
- STEM
- Social sciences
- Humanities
- Arts
- Business
- Health professions
- Education
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q21
Opinion Scale
How satisfied are you with opportunities for professional development available to you?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q22
Opinion Scale
How satisfied are you with the predictability and timeliness of your pay?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q23
Dropdown
Typically, how far in advance are you notified of a new course assignment?
- Less than 1 week
- 1–2 weeks
- 3–4 weeks
- 1–2 months
- More than 2 months
- Not applicable
Q24
Multiple Choice
In which region is your institution located?
- Northeast (U.S.)
- Midwest (U.S.)
- South (U.S.)
- West (U.S.)
- Outside the U.S.
- Prefer not to say
Q25
Multiple Choice
What is your gender identity?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
Q26
Multiple Choice
What is your age range?
- Under 25
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Combines structured opinion-scale ratings on pay equity, benefits, and pay predictability with an AI follow-up interview that asks each respondent to identify their single most important improvement area, generating richer qualitative context than fixed-choice forms alone
- Covers the full adjunct experience lifecycle in one instrument — onboarding, mentoring, professional development, scheduling notice, LMS/tech support, and classroom facilities — rather than a generic faculty satisfaction snapshot
- Includes a ranking question forcing respondents to prioritize improvement areas (pay, support, resources, scheduling), giving administrators a clear action hierarchy instead of just averages
- Segments results by institution type, discipline, region, appointment length, and demographics, enabling equity-focused subgroup analysis specific to adjunct/part-time status
QuestionPro
University Faculty Satisfaction SurveyA general faculty satisfaction template covering broad workplace topics like workload and campus climate, not adjunct-specific pay equity or scheduling predictability. It's a static, ready-to-field questionnaire rather than an adaptive interview tool. Useful as a generic starting point but requires heavy customization for adjunct/part-time-specific compensation issues.
What it does well
- Established survey platform with a ready-made faculty satisfaction template
- Covers general faculty experience topics applicable across institution types
- Likely offers standard survey logic and reporting dashboards
Where it falls short
- Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into individual responses
- No adjunct-specific focus on per-course pay, benefits access, or assignment notice timing
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated qualitative scoring of open responses
SurveyMonkey
University Faculty Satisfaction Survey QuestionsSurveyMonkey's faculty satisfaction template targets general faculty sentiment rather than the specific pay-equity and scheduling concerns unique to adjunct and part-time instructors. It's a static question bank designed for broad customization, not a purpose-built adjunct compensation instrument. Reporting is standard dashboard analytics rather than narrative, interview-based insight.
What it does well
- Widely used platform with strong survey distribution and basic analytics tools
- Faculty-focused template saves time versus building from scratch
- Simple to customize question wording for different institution types
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI interview or voice-based follow-up to probe pay equity or workload concerns
- Not tailored to adjunct-specific issues like per-course pay or last-minute scheduling
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt disclosure
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Education & Academic
Academic Integrity Climate Survey for Students
Measures student awareness of academic integrity policies, perceived peer norms around misconduct, and views on institutional interventions. Designed for education administrators and researchers seeking actionable data to strengthen integrity culture.
View templateEducation & Academic
Academic Advising Session Satisfaction Survey
Measures student satisfaction, perceived quality, and outcomes after academic advising sessions. Designed for institutional advising offices seeking actionable feedback to improve service delivery.
View templateEducation & Academic
Remote & Hybrid Work Experience Survey: Productivity, Well-being & Engagement
Measures employee perceptions of productivity, well-being, collaboration, and engagement across remote, hybrid, and in-office arrangements. Use this instrument to identify burnout risk factors and inform flexible-work policy decisions.
View templateEducation & Academic
Vacation Bible School Registration & Family Needs Survey
Captures why families register for your Vacation Bible School, their scheduling and logistics preferences, and any health or accessibility needs — with an AI follow-up that surfaces the real motivations and hesitations behind a family's choice instead of just checkbox answers.
View templateEducation & Academic
Teacher Job Application & Fit Screening Survey
Screens teaching candidates on certification, subject and grade-level fit, classroom experience, and job priorities before an in-person interview. Built for school and district hiring teams; the AI follow-up interview goes past rehearsed talking points to reconstruct how a candidate actually handled a real classroom challenge.
View templateEducation & Academic
College Football Top 25 Poll Reasoning Survey
Captures how fans, media, or panel voters actually build a college football Top 25 ballot — which teams they'd rank where, which criteria drive those calls, and how confident they are in the official rankings. The AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind a voter's #1 pick and any team where their ballot diverges sharply from the published poll.
View template