All templates
Sustainability & Impact

Enterprise WTP & Adoption Drivers for Low-Carbon Software

Surveys enterprise software buyers to measure demand, willingness to pay, and key adoption barriers for low-carbon software. Identifies price sensitivity thresholds and ESG procurement priorities across industries and organization sizes.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

20 questions · ~9 min
Q01
Message

Welcome! This survey explores enterprise perspectives on lower-carbon software options. Your participation is entirely voluntary and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential, anonymized, and reported only in aggregate for research purposes. This should take about 7–10 minutes.

Q02
Multiple Choice

Which of the following best describes your involvement in software purchasing decisions for your organization?

  • I am a final decision-maker
  • I am part of the buying committee
  • I recommend or influence vendors
  • I approve budgets for software purchases
  • I have no involvement in software purchasing
Q03
Opinion Scale

How satisfied are you with the sustainability information currently provided by software vendors?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all satisfiedMax:Extremely satisfied
Q04
Opinion Scale

How interested is your organization in choosing a greener software option when functionality is comparable to alternatives?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all interestedMax:Extremely interested
Q05
Dropdown

Assuming equal functionality and performance, what is the maximum price premium your organization would pay for a materially greener software option?

  • 0% — would not pay any premium
  • 1–5%
  • 6–10%
  • 11–15%
  • 16–20%
  • More than 20%
  • Unsure
Q06
Ranking

Please rank the following drivers of greener software adoption from most to least important for your organization over the next 12–24 months.

  1. New or tightening environmental regulations
  2. Internal ESG or sustainability targets
  3. Customer or partner contractual requirements
  4. Demonstrable cost savings or efficiency gains
  5. Competitive differentiation in the market
  6. Employee expectations around sustainability
Drag to rank
Q07
Long Text

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts on how green criteria factor into your software procurement decisions, or what would most increase your likelihood to choose greener software.

Q08
Dropdown

Approximately how many employees does your organization have?

  • Fewer than 200
  • 200–999
  • 1,000–4,999
  • 5,000–19,999
  • 20,000 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
Message

You've reached the end of the survey. Thank you for sharing your insights — your responses will help advance research on sustainable software procurement. Please submit your responses now.

Q10
Message

Thank you for your interest. This survey is designed for professionals involved in software purchasing decisions. Based on your response, you are not eligible for this study. We appreciate your time.

Q11
Multiple Choice

Which of the following have been barriers to purchasing greener software in the last 12 months? Select all that apply.

  • Lack of standardized carbon or sustainability metrics
  • Higher cost of greener alternatives
  • Limited availability of greener vendor options
  • Insufficient executive or leadership buy-in
  • No regulatory or compliance requirement to do so
  • Concerns about performance or reliability trade-offs
  • Greener software not a current organizational priority
  • Other (please specify)
  • None of the above
Q12
Opinion Scale

How likely is your organization to actively evaluate greener software alternatives in the next 12 months?

Scale: 17
Min:Extremely unlikelyMax:Extremely likely
Q13
Dropdown

What payback timeframe would your organization expect to recoup any premium paid for greener software?

  • Immediate (would not pay a premium)
  • Less than 12 months
  • 12–24 months
  • 25–36 months
  • More than 36 months
  • Unsure
Q14
AI Interview

We'd like to explore your thoughts on greener software decisions in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your responses.

Q15
Dropdown

What is your organization's primary industry?

  • Technology
  • Financial services
  • Manufacturing
  • Retail / Consumer goods
  • Healthcare
  • Energy / Utilities
  • Public sector
  • Education
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
Ranking

Please rank the following from most to least important in terms of where the value of greener software comes from for your organization.

  1. Reduced carbon emissions and environmental impact
  2. Cost savings from improved efficiency
  3. Regulatory and compliance readiness
  4. Customer or partner sustainability requirements
  5. Brand and reputation benefits
  6. Employee engagement and talent attraction
Drag to rank
Q17
Dropdown

Where is your organization primarily headquartered?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Latin America
  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
Opinion Scale

To what extent would your organization accept minor performance trade-offs in order to reduce software-related carbon emissions?

Scale: 17
Min:Would not accept any trade-offsMax:Would readily accept trade-offs
Q19
Dropdown

What is your role level within your organization?

  • Executive (C-suite / VP)
  • Director
  • Manager
  • Individual contributor
  • Consultant / Contractor
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
Dropdown

Approximately how much does your organization spend annually on software across all categories?

  • Less than $1M
  • $1M–$4.9M
  • $5M–$19.9M
  • $20M–$99.9M
  • $100M or more
  • Unsure
  • Prefer not to say

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Combines quantitative measures (opinion scales on satisfaction with current sustainability disclosures, interest and likelihood to evaluate greener alternatives, tolerance for performance trade-offs) with ranking questions on value drivers and adoption drivers, plus dropdowns capturing maximum price premium and expected payback timeframe
  • Segments responses by firmographics — employee count, industry, HQ region, role level, and software spend — enabling cross-tab analysis of price sensitivity and ESG priorities
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview segment that probes the qualitative reasoning behind a respondent's stated WTP and barriers, going beyond what a static questionnaire can capture
  • Closes with an open-text reflection question and automated end-to-end reporting, so nuanced procurement rationale isn't lost between the scaled questions

QuestionPro

20 Software Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a general software evaluation content guide with a sample questionnaire, not a purpose-built survey for enterprise WTP or ESG procurement drivers. It's useful as a reference for general software vendor evaluation criteria but isn't focused on low-carbon software, price sensitivity thresholds, or sustainability procurement priorities. Best read as an educational article rather than a fielding-ready instrument for this specific research question.

What it does well

  • Covers broad software evaluation criteria like usability, features, and support that could be adapted
  • Provides a sample questionnaire structure as a starting point
  • Backed by an established survey platform with wide question-type support

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interviews — questions are static text with no dynamic probing
  • No focus on sustainability, ESG procurement, or willingness-to-pay pricing thresholds
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated insight reporting

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
Sustainability & Impact

Logistics EV Fleet Electrification Readiness Assessment

A readiness audit for logistics and fleet operations leaders evaluating EV deployment, covering charging infrastructure, energy management, training, and budget—designed to benchmark preparedness and identify deployment risks.

View template
Sustainability & Impact

Home Energy Upgrade Customer Experience Survey

Measures homeowner satisfaction across the full energy-upgrade journey—from site assessment through installation and rebate application—to identify improvement opportunities for program administrators and installers.

View template
Sustainability & Impact

Public EV Charging Reliability & Pricing Survey

Measures EV drivers' experiences with public charging station availability, reliability, and pricing transparency over the past 30 days to identify key pain points and improvement priorities.

View template
Sustainability & Impact

EV Public Charging Payment Clarity & Reliability Survey

A diagnostic survey for EV drivers who have used public charging in the last 30 days, measuring payment transparency, first-attempt success rates, failure patterns, and perceived price fairness to identify priority improvement areas for charging operators.

View template
Sustainability & Impact

Corporate Social & Environmental Responsibility Perception Survey

Measures consumer awareness, credibility perceptions, and purchase influence of corporate CSR and ESG initiatives, including brand trust, willingness to pay, and expectations for responsible business practices.

View template
Sustainability & Impact

Water Stewardship vs. Product Attributes: Consumer Tradeoff Study

Measures how consumers weigh responsible water use against price, quality, and other product attributes. Designed for consumer panels to quantify sustainability-driven tradeoffs and identify the attitudinal and contextual drivers behind willingness to pay for water stewardship.

View template