MMM Readiness & Data Governance Assessment
Evaluates an organization's Marketing Mix Modeling maturity across data foundations, governance practices, validation methods, and resourcing. Designed for marketing, analytics, and media professionals involved in or planning MMM initiatives.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Are you currently involved in—or do you have visibility into—marketing analytics, media measurement, or budget planning at your organization?
- Yes
- No
Which best describes your organization's current stage with Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM)?
- Actively running MMM
- Ran MMM in the last 12 months
- Piloting or prototyping MMM
- Planning to start within 12 months
- Not planning MMM
Which data sources does your organization currently use or plan to use for MMM? (Select all that apply.)
- Paid media spend and impressions by channel
- Search data (paid and organic)
- Social platform data
- Website and app analytics
- CRM and marketing automation engagement
- Sales data by product or region
- Pricing and promotions
- Distribution and availability
- Brand tracking
- Competitor spend estimates
- Economic, weather, or other external factors
- Experiment and lift test results
Overall, how ready is your organization to leverage MMM for marketing decisions in the next 12 months?
Which governance practices are currently in place for your MMM-related data and models? (Select all that apply.)
- Documented data dictionary or definitions
- Data catalog or lineage tracking
- Named data owner or steward
- SLA for data refresh and issue resolution
- Formal QA or validation checklist
- Access controls and role-based permissions
- Change log or versioning for datasets and models
- Model governance committee or review board
- Documented data retention policy
- None of the above
What best describes your current or planned MMM approach?
- In-house team
- External vendor or consultancy
- Hybrid (in-house plus partner)
- Automated cloud service
- Open-source stack built internally
- Not sure or still evaluating
Based on your responses in this survey, what single change would most improve your organization's MMM effectiveness in the next 6–12 months?
What is your primary role?
- Marketing leader
- Growth or performance marketer
- Media and activation
- Data science or analytics
- Finance or revenue operations
- Product or CRM
- Consultant or agency
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses have been recorded and will be analyzed in aggregate to advance MMM best practices. If you have any questions, please contact the research team.
Which decision areas does your organization currently use—or plan to use—MMM to inform? (Select all that apply.)
- Budget allocation across channels
- Media mix within a channel
- Campaign flighting and timing
- Geographic allocation
- Creative and messaging strategy
- Pricing and promotions
- Scenario planning and forecasting
Approximately how many distinct data sources are integrated (or planned) in your MMM dataset?
- 1–3
- 4–7
- 8–12
- 13–20
- More than 20
- Not sure
Rank the biggest inhibitors to effective MMM at your organization. (Drag to reorder; most limiting at top.)
- Data quality and coverage
- Analytics talent and ownership
- Budget constraints
- Stakeholder buy-in
- Fragmented martech and data stack
- Time and bandwidth
How confident are you that your MMM workflow complies with applicable privacy regulations and internal data policies?
Which validation methods do you use (or plan to use) to assess MMM reliability? (Select all that apply.)
- Time-based cross-validation (rolling origin)
- Holdout or out-of-time testing
- Alignment with experiments or incrementality tests
- Back-testing on historical shocks
- External benchmarks or market events sanity check
- Business stakeholder review
- None of the above
Thank you for your survey responses. We'd like to explore a few of your answers in more depth. Please share your thoughts in the conversation below.
How many years of experience do you have in marketing, analytics, or related fields?
- Less than 1
- 1–3
- 4–6
- 7–10
- 11–15
- 16+
- Prefer not to say
Which integration challenges are most significant for your MMM data pipeline? (Select all that apply.)
- Inconsistent IDs or keys across sources
- Missing or incomplete historical data
- Different time grains (daily, weekly, monthly)
- Taxonomy and naming differences
- Data silos and access constraints
- Data latency or delayed availability
- Vendor definition changes over time
- Legal or privacy restrictions
- None of the above
Approximately how many employees does your organization have?
- 1–49
- 50–249
- 250–999
- 1,000–4,999
- 5,000+
- Prefer not to say
What is the typical refresh cadence of your MMM dataset?
- Near real-time
- Daily
- Weekly
- Monthly
- Quarterly
- Ad hoc or as needed
- Not yet established
Which industry best describes your organization?
- Retail or ecommerce
- Consumer packaged goods (CPG)
- Technology or software
- Financial services
- Media or entertainment
- Healthcare or pharma
- Travel or hospitality
- Automotive
- Other
- Prefer not to say
How would you rate the completeness of the data available for your MMM (i.e., minimal missing values or gaps)?
What is your organization's primary region of operation?
- North America
- Latin America
- Europe
- Middle East & Africa
- Asia-Pacific
- Global
- Prefer not to say
How would you rate the consistency of your MMM data across sources (i.e., aligned definitions, taxonomies, and formats)?
What is your level of influence on paid media budget decisions?
- Final decision maker
- Recommender or approver
- Contributor or analyst
- No direct role
- Prefer not to say
How would you rate the timeliness of your MMM data (i.e., data is available when needed for modeling and decisions)?
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Why this template
What this template is built to do — we found no directly comparable template from other survey tools to review.
What sets it apart
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that probes inconsistent or vague answers from the earlier structured questions, rather than stopping at fixed-choice responses
- Covers the specific MMM maturity dimensions (data completeness, consistency, timeliness, refresh cadence, validation methods, governance practices) rather than generic marketing data collection
- Combines opinion-scale ratings, a ranking exercise on inhibitors, and an open-text prioritization question to build a structured readiness profile, then synthesizes findings into an auto-generated report
- Captures respondent context (role, tenure, org size, industry, region, budget influence) to segment MMM readiness findings by professional background
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Campaign Goals & Attribution Practices Audit
A 90-day diagnostic survey for ecommerce teams to evaluate campaign goal-setting, attribution methods, tool effectiveness, and cross-functional alignment — surfacing gaps in ROAS, CAC measurement, and reporting workflows.
View templateMarketer Trust in Identity Resolution & Graph Accuracy
Measures marketing professionals' confidence in identity resolution accuracy, validation practices, and vendor evaluation criteria. Designed for B2B research targeting practitioners and decision-makers responsible for customer identity strategy.
View templateBrand Name Testing: Memorability & Distinctiveness Evaluation
Evaluates and compares candidate brand names on memorability, distinctiveness, and category appropriateness to identify the strongest option for a product or service launch.
View templateData Clean Room Adoption & Trust Assessment
Measures marketing professionals' awareness, trust, perceived accuracy, and adoption barriers related to data clean rooms for measurement. Ideal for ad tech vendors, industry bodies, or research teams benchmarking clean room sentiment.
View templateApp Store Listing A/B Concept Test
Evaluates two app store listing variants on clarity, appeal, trust, and conversion intent to identify the higher-performing concept. Designed for respondents who have recently browsed or installed apps.
View templateMarketing Chatbot Experience & Effectiveness Survey
Measures how well your website or marketing chatbot resolves visitor questions, builds trust, and moves people toward a purchase or signup. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the respondent's most recent chatbot conversation in detail, surfacing exactly where it helped or broke down. Built for marketing and CX teams evaluating a live chatbot deployment.
View template