모든 템플릿

AI Chatbot Effectiveness in Student Advising & Support

This survey evaluates student experiences with AI chatbot advising and support services. It measures usage patterns, task types, perceived success rates, satisfaction, trust, comparison to human advisors, and areas for improvement.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 26개 · 약 11분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to this survey on AI chatbot advising and support services. We are conducting research to understand student experiences with AI chatbot tools used for academic advising and support. Your participation is completely voluntary, and you may stop at any time without consequence. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions and experiences. All responses are anonymous, confidential, and will be reported only in aggregate for research purposes. This survey takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. By continuing, you consent to participate in this research.

Q02
객관식

Have you used an AI chatbot for academic advising or student support services at your institution?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
객관식

In the current or most recent semester, approximately how often have you used the AI chatbot for advising or support?

  • Once
  • 2–3 times
  • 4–6 times
  • 7–10 times
  • More than 10 times
Q04
의견 척도

Thinking about your overall experience, how often has the AI chatbot successfully resolved your questions or tasks?

척도: 15
최소:Never최대:Always
Q05
의견 척도

How much do you trust the accuracy of the information provided by the AI chatbot?

척도: 17
최소:Do not trust at all최대:Trust completely
Q06
객관식

Have you also consulted a human advisor for academic advising or student support this semester?

  • Yes
  • No
Q07
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to hear more about your specific experiences with the AI chatbot. Please describe a recent interaction you had — what were you trying to accomplish, what happened, and how could the experience have been better?

Q08
의견 척도

How likely are you to continue using the AI chatbot for advising or support in the future?

척도: 17
최소:Extremely unlikely최대:Extremely likely
Q09
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about the AI chatbot advising experience that we may not have covered.

Q10
드롭다운

What is your current year of study?

  • First year / Freshman
  • Second year / Sophomore
  • Third year / Junior
  • Fourth year / Senior
  • Fifth year or beyond
  • Graduate student (Master's)
  • Graduate student (Doctoral)
  • Other
Q11
객관식

Which of the following tasks have you attempted using the AI chatbot? Select all that apply.

  • Course registration or enrollment questions
  • Degree requirements or academic planning
  • Financial aid or billing inquiries
  • Campus resources or services information
  • Scheduling appointments with advisors
  • Career guidance or internship information
  • Technical or IT support
  • Mental health or wellness resources
  • Deadline or calendar reminders
  • Other (please specify)
Q12
의견 척도

Overall, how satisfied are you with the quality of responses provided by the AI chatbot?

척도: 17
최소:Extremely dissatisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q13
의견 척도

How confident are you in making academic decisions based on the AI chatbot's recommendations?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q14
의견 척도

Compared to a human advisor, how would you rate the AI chatbot on accuracy of information?

척도: 17
최소:Much worse than a human advisor최대:Much better than a human advisor
Q15
의견 척도

How likely are you to recommend the AI chatbot to a fellow student?

척도: 17
최소:Extremely unlikely최대:Extremely likely
Q16
드롭다운

What is your primary field of study?

  • Arts & Humanities
  • Business & Management
  • Education
  • Engineering & Technology
  • Health Sciences & Medicine
  • Law
  • Natural Sciences & Mathematics
  • Social Sciences
  • Computer Science & Information Technology
  • Other (please specify)
Q17
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with the accuracy of the information provided by the AI chatbot?

척도: 17
최소:Extremely dissatisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q18
의견 척도

Compared to a human advisor, how would you rate the AI chatbot on understanding your specific situation?

척도: 17
최소:Much worse than a human advisor최대:Much better than a human advisor
Q19
드롭다운

What is your age range?

  • 18–20
  • 21–23
  • 24–26
  • 27–30
  • 31–35
  • 36 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with the speed of the AI chatbot's responses?

척도: 17
최소:Extremely dissatisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q21
의견 척도

Compared to a human advisor, how would you rate the AI chatbot on convenience and accessibility?

척도: 17
최소:Much worse than a human advisor최대:Much better than a human advisor
Q22
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with the clarity and understandability of the AI chatbot's responses?

척도: 17
최소:Extremely dissatisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q23
의견 척도

Compared to a human advisor, how would you rate the AI chatbot on the overall quality of support provided?

척도: 17
최소:Much worse than a human advisor최대:Much better than a human advisor
Q24
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with the helpfulness of the AI chatbot in addressing your specific needs?

척도: 17
최소:Extremely dissatisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q25
객관식

If you could choose, which option would you most prefer for academic advising or support?

  • AI chatbot only
  • Human advisor only
  • A combination of both AI chatbot and human advisor
  • No preference
Q26
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with how easy the AI chatbot is to use?

척도: 17
최소:Extremely dissatisfied최대:Extremely satisfied

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview that lets students describe specific chatbot experiences in their own words, going beyond fixed-choice ratings
  • Covers usage patterns and task types (which advising tasks were attempted) alongside granular satisfaction dimensions — accuracy, speed, clarity, helpfulness, and ease of use
  • Directly benchmarks the AI chatbot against human advisors on accuracy, understanding, convenience, and overall quality, plus captures stated preference for AI vs. human vs. hybrid support
  • Measures trust and decision-confidence in AI recommendations, and closes with an open-text reflection question plus demographic breakdowns (year, field of study, age) for segmentation

SurveySparrow

Customer Support Chatbot Template

This is a fielding-ready static template for evaluating chatbot-based customer support, which overlaps conceptually with chatbot effectiveness measurement. However, it is built for general customer support contexts rather than academic advising, so questions around task types, trust in academic decisions, or comparison to human advisors are not present. It would require substantial customization to fit a student advising use case.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for chatbot interaction feedback rather than a generic satisfaction survey
  • Likely includes standard CSAT/ease-of-use question types common to chatbot evaluation
  • Quick to deploy for teams already using SurveySparrow's platform

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI-driven follow-up probing into individual chatbot experiences
  • Not tailored to academic advising — lacks student-specific constructs like trust in academic decisions or comparison to human advisors
  • No published methodology for scoring response quality, unlike QuestionPunk's automated per-response scoring

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.