QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Online Training Course Feedback Survey

Captures how learners actually experienced an online training course — completion, content quality, instructor clarity, and confidence applying the material — for L&D teams and course designers. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real obstacles behind low satisfaction or recommendation scores instead of settling for a bare number.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking this training! We'd love your honest feedback so we can improve it for the next group. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 5 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

How much of this training did you complete?

  • All of it
  • Most of it
  • About half
  • Less than half
  • None of it
Q03
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about the training?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • The content was relevant to my role
  • The instructor/facilitator explained concepts clearly
  • The pace of the training was appropriate
  • The exercises and practice activities helped me learn
  • The platform was easy to navigate
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
의견 척도필수

Overall, how satisfied are you with this training?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q05
평점 척도

How would you rate the quality of the training materials (slides, videos, handouts)?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Poor최대:Excellent
Q06
객관식

Which part of the training did you find most engaging?

  • Self-paced videos or readings
  • Live instructor-led sessions
  • Hands-on exercises or simulations
  • Quizzes and knowledge checks
  • Discussion boards or peer interaction
Q07
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this training to a colleague who needs the same skills?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's satisfaction and recommendation scores: ask what specifically drove that number and what a top score would have required. If they flagged a low agreement item in the earlier ratings (pacing, clarity, relevance, exercises, or platform), dig into a concrete moment where that fell short. Also surface the single biggest obstacle they expect to applying what they learned on the job, and what support would remove it.

Q09
순위 매기기

Rank the following aspects of the training from most to least valuable to your learning.

  1. Course content
  2. Instructor/facilitator
  3. Learning materials
  4. Pacing and structure
  5. Practical exercises
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q10
객관식필수

What is the single biggest obstacle to applying what you learned in your day-to-day work?

  • Lack of time
  • Lack of manager support
  • Content not directly relevant to my role
  • I've already forgotten most of it
  • No obstacle — I'm already applying it
Q11
객관식

Which best describes your role or department? (Template note: replace these with your own department list before launching.)

  • (Replace with department A)
  • (Replace with department B)
  • (Replace with department C)
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How much experience did you have with this topic before the training?

  • None
  • A little
  • Some
  • A lot
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your feedback goes straight to the team that designs this training and will shape the next version.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a satisfaction number with an AI follow-up interview that probes the actual reasoning behind low satisfaction or recommendation scores, instead of leaving low scores unexplained.
  • Combines structured measurement (completion multiple-choice, agreement matrix, materials rating, opinion scales, ranking of valuable aspects) with open-ended obstacle identification, so L&D teams get both the 'what' and the 'why'.
  • Includes a ranking question and a dedicated 'biggest obstacle to applying what you learned' question, which directly targets transfer-of-learning gaps that generic satisfaction surveys skip.
  • Prompts for the AI interview are transparent and viewable, and results roll into an auto-generated report — no manual theme-coding of open text required.

SurveySparrow

Online Training Feedback Form Template

A ready-to-field form covering standard training feedback questions (content, delivery, satisfaction). SurveySparrow does offer conversational/chat-style survey formats on its platform generally, but this specific template is a fixed question set with no adaptive follow-up logic. Good for quick fielding, less suited for diagnosing root causes of low scores.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-use, fieldable template
  • Part of a broader conversational-survey platform
  • Education-focused template library for context

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning tied to individual responses
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No published prompt/methodology transparency for how questions are analyzed

Jotform

Online Course Instructor Feedback Form Template

A static, drag-and-drop-editable form focused specifically on instructor performance rather than full course experience (completion, materials, transfer to job). Useful if instructor evaluation is the sole goal, but narrower in scope than a full training-feedback instrument and offers no dynamic questioning.

잘하는 점

  • Easy visual form builder and customization
  • Purpose-built for instructor-specific feedback
  • Large template library for related use cases

아쉬운 점

  • Narrower scope (instructor only, not full course/completion/application experience)
  • No adaptive AI interview to probe reasons behind ratings
  • No automated report generation or per-response scoring

Typeform

Training Feedback Form Template

A conversational one-question-at-a-time form, which reads more naturally than a grid form but is still a fixed sequence of pre-written questions. It does not adapt follow-up questions based on what a respondent actually types, so nuanced dissatisfaction reasons are left to open text fields.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational one-at-a-time question flow
  • Strong design/branding customization
  • Mobile-friendly respondent experience

아쉬운 점

  • No AI-driven adaptive follow-up on individual answers
  • No voice-based interview option
  • No automated quality scoring of responses or auto-generated analytical report

SurveyMonkey

Training Course Evaluation Template: Questions & Feedback Guide

This page functions as much as a guide to writing training-evaluation questions as a ready-to-field template, with explanatory content around the question list. It gives a solid static question bank for course evaluation but no mechanism to dig deeper into individual low scores.

잘하는 점

  • Educational context and question-writing guidance alongside the template
  • Backed by a well-established survey platform with broad reporting features
  • Question bank covers common evaluation angles

아쉬운 점

  • Presented partly as a guide rather than a purely fielding-ready instrument
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice interview option
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기