모든 템플릿

Student Interest in Course Topics and Activities Survey

Measures which topics, formats, and learning activities genuinely capture student curiosity versus which ones fall flat, for instructors and instructional designers refining a course or program. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment interest sparked or died, surfacing detail that ratings alone can't reveal.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your honest reactions to this course! We want to know what topics and activities actually grab your attention (and which ones don't) so we can make it better. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
의견 척도필수

Overall, how interested have you been in the material covered in this course so far?

척도: 110
최소:Not interested at all최대:Extremely interested
Q03
매트릭스필수

How interested are you in each of the following topics? (Template note: replace with the actual unit or topic list for this course before launching.)

4개 행 × 5개 열
  • (Replace with Topic A)
  • (Replace with Topic B)
  • (Replace with Topic C)
  • (Replace with Topic D)
: Not at all interested · Slightly interested · Moderately interested · Very interested · Extremely interested
Q04
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

From this list of topics covered this term, pick the one you find most interesting and the one you find least interesting each round. (Template note: replace with your actual topic list, 6-9 items.)

  • (Replace with Topic A)
  • (Replace with Topic B)
  • (Replace with Topic C)
  • (Replace with Topic D)
  • (Replace with Topic E)
  • (Replace with Topic F)
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most interesting최악:Least interesting
Q05
객관식필수

Which single factor most drives whether you get interested in a topic?

  • It feels relevant to my future career
  • It's genuinely new or surprising to me
  • The way it's taught makes it click
  • It connects to something in my own life
  • It's challenging in a satisfying way
Q06
순위 매기기필수

Rank these learning activities from most to least effective at increasing your interest in a topic.

  1. Lecture with slides
  2. Small-group discussion
  3. Hands-on project or lab
  4. Real-world case study
  5. Video or multimedia
  6. Guest speaker or expert Q&A
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q07
평점 척도필수

How likely are you to choose an elective or advanced course in this subject area?

범위: 15
최소:Very unlikely최대:Very likely
Q08
단문형

What's one topic or activity you wish this course spent more time on?

Q09
AI 인터뷰

Ask the respondent about the topic they rated lowest in the interest questions: what specifically made it feel boring or irrelevant, and whether a different format or example would have changed that. Then ask about their highest-rated topic or activity and reconstruct the exact moment interest kicked in. If they said they're unlikely to take further courses in the subject, probe whether that's about the subject itself or how it's been taught.

Q10
객관식

What year or grade level are you currently in?

  • First year
  • Second year
  • Third year
  • Fourth year or beyond
  • Graduate student
Q11
객관식

What is your primary field of study or major?

  • Sciences
  • Engineering or Technology
  • Humanities
  • Business
  • Arts
  • Social Sciences
  • Undecided
Q12
메시지

That's everything - thank you! Your answers feed directly into how this course's topics and activities get redesigned for future terms.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a matrix rating topics and a max-diff exercise to pinpoint exactly which topics spark curiosity versus which ones don't
  • Pairs a ranked list of learning activities with an AI follow-up interview that asks about the specific topic each student rated lowest, surfacing the moment interest died
  • Captures downstream signal via a likelihood-to-take-an-elective question and open-ended 'wish we'd spent more time on' feedback, plus field-of-study and year level for segmentation
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean instructors get synthesized findings, not just raw spreadsheet data

Jotform

Student Interest Survey Form Template

A static, drag-and-drop form template for gauging student interest, easy to customize with Jotform's form builder and widgets. It's built for quick deployment rather than deep qualitative insight. No mention of adaptive questioning or AI-assisted analysis.

잘하는 점

  • Fast to deploy and customize via a familiar drag-and-drop builder
  • Broad integration ecosystem typical of Jotform's platform
  • Free-tier accessible template, low setup friction

아쉬운 점

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive follow-up when a student's answer signals strong disinterest or curiosity
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • No automated quality scoring or synthesized report generation - raw responses require manual analysis

Typeform

Student Interest Survey Form Template

A polished, conversational-style form template that walks students through interest questions one at a time, well-suited to boosting completion rates. It remains a static question flow rather than a true interview. Reporting depends on Typeform's standard analytics dashboards.

잘하는 점

  • Engaging one-question-at-a-time interface that tends to improve completion rates
  • Clean, mobile-friendly design out of the box
  • Logic-jump branching for basic conditional paths

아쉬운 점

  • Branching logic is pre-scripted, not a genuine adaptive AI probe into an individual's specific answer
  • No voice-based interview or screen-share task capability
  • No transparent per-response quality scoring or automatic qualitative report generation

QuestionPro

Course evaluation sample questions and survey template

This page is closer to a course/teacher evaluation guide with sample question banks than a narrowly focused, ready-to-field topic-interest survey; instructors would need to assemble and adapt questions themselves. It suits broad course-quality feedback more than pinpointing which specific topics or activities spark curiosity. Reporting relies on QuestionPro's general dashboard/analytics tools.

잘하는 점

  • Large bank of sample evaluation questions covering instructor and course quality broadly
  • Established survey platform with standard reporting and cross-tabulation features
  • Applicable across many course types, not narrowly scoped

아쉬운 점

  • Presented as a question-bank/guide rather than a single ready-to-field template focused on topic-level interest
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to explore why a specific topic or activity fell flat
  • No voice AI interviews, guided screen-share tasks, or automated per-response quality scoring

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.