모든 템플릿

AI Literacy Self-Assessment for Undergraduates

A validated self-assessment instrument measuring undergraduate AI literacy across five dimensions: conceptual understanding, practical skills, critical evaluation, ethical reasoning, and awareness of limitations. Estimated completion time: 10-12 minutes.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 33개 · 약 14분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the AI Literacy Self-Assessment. This survey asks about your experiences with and understanding of artificial intelligence (AI) tools and concepts. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest self-assessment of your current knowledge and skills. Your participation is completely voluntary and you may stop at any time. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. Results will be used for educational research purposes to better understand AI literacy among undergraduate students. This survey takes approximately 10-12 minutes to complete. By continuing, you indicate that you have read and understood this information and consent to participate.

Q02
객관식

Are you currently enrolled as an undergraduate student at a college or university?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
객관식

How often do you use AI-powered tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Grammarly, DALL-E) for any purpose?

  • Never
  • A few times a year
  • A few times a month
  • A few times a week
  • Daily or almost daily
Q04
메시지

The following statements describe knowledge and skills related to AI concepts. For each statement, please indicate how much you agree or disagree based on your current abilities.

Q05
의견 척도

I can use AI-powered tools effectively to help me complete academic tasks (e.g., research, writing, coding).

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q06
의견 척도

I can identify when an AI tool has generated inaccurate or fabricated information.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q07
의견 척도

I can identify ethical concerns that arise from using AI tools in academic work.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q08
의견 척도

I can describe the types of tasks where current AI systems are likely to perform poorly or unreliably.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q09
의견 척도

Overall, how would you rate your current level of AI literacy?

척도: 17
최소:Very low최대:Very high
Q10
AI 인터뷰

Thinking about your responses throughout this survey, what do you see as the biggest gap in your own AI literacy, and what would help you address it?

Q11
메시지

Finally, we have a few questions about your background for classification purposes.

Q12
객관식

Which of the following AI-powered tools have you used at least once? Select all that apply.

  • ChatGPT
  • Microsoft Copilot
  • Google Gemini
  • Claude
  • Grammarly
  • DALL-E / Midjourney / other image generators
  • GitHub Copilot / coding assistants
  • AI-powered search (e.g., Perplexity, Bing AI)
  • Other AI tools
  • I have never used any AI tools
Q13
의견 척도

I can explain the basic concept of artificial intelligence in my own words.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q14
의견 척도

I can write clear and specific prompts to get useful results from generative AI tools.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q15
의견 척도

I can evaluate whether AI-generated content is well-reasoned and supported by evidence.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q16
의견 척도

I can explain the privacy implications of sharing personal or sensitive data with AI tools.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q17
의견 척도

I can explain why AI systems sometimes generate confident-sounding but incorrect responses.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q18
의견 척도

How prepared do you feel to use AI tools responsibly and effectively in your academic and professional life?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all prepared최대:Extremely prepared
Q19
드롭다운

What is your current year of undergraduate study?

  • First year / Freshman
  • Second year / Sophomore
  • Third year / Junior
  • Fourth year / Senior
  • Fifth year or beyond
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
객관식

Have you completed any formal course, workshop, or training that covered artificial intelligence or machine learning concepts?

  • Yes, a full course (e.g., semester-long)
  • Yes, a short workshop or training session
  • No, but I have learned informally (e.g., online videos, articles)
  • No, I have no formal or informal AI education
Q21
의견 척도

I can describe how a machine learning model learns patterns from data.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q22
의견 척도

I can choose the most appropriate AI tool for a specific task from among the options available to me.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q23
의견 척도

I can recognize potential biases in the outputs produced by AI systems.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q24
의견 척도

I can evaluate whether using an AI tool in a specific academic situation would be considered a violation of academic integrity.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q25
의견 척도

I can identify situations where it would be inappropriate or risky to rely on AI-generated outputs.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q26
드롭다운

Which of the following best describes your primary field of study?

  • Computer Science / Information Technology
  • Engineering
  • Natural Sciences (e.g., Biology, Chemistry, Physics)
  • Mathematics / Statistics
  • Social Sciences (e.g., Psychology, Sociology, Political Science)
  • Business / Economics
  • Humanities (e.g., English, History, Philosophy)
  • Arts / Design / Media
  • Health Sciences / Nursing
  • Education
  • Other
  • Undeclared / Undecided
  • Prefer not to say
Q27
의견 척도

I can explain the difference between AI that follows predefined rules and AI that learns from examples.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q28
의견 척도

I can modify and refine AI-generated outputs to improve their quality and relevance for my needs.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q29
의견 척도

I can verify AI-generated claims by cross-referencing them with credible sources.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q30
의견 척도

I can articulate how AI systems might perpetuate or amplify societal inequities.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q31
의견 척도

I understand that AI systems do not truly comprehend or understand information the way humans do.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q32
드롭다운

What is your age?

  • 18 or under
  • 19-20
  • 21-22
  • 23-25
  • 26-30
  • 31 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q33
의견 척도

I can describe what training data is and why it matters for AI system performance.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.

차별화 포인트

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview question that asks respondents to reflect on the biggest gap in their AI literacy after seeing their own scale responses, enabling deeper, personalized probing that a static form cannot replicate
  • Structured across the five stated dimensions (conceptual understanding, practical skills, critical evaluation, ethical reasoning, awareness of limitations) with dedicated opinion-scale items for each, rather than a generic single-topic checklist
  • Opens with screening questions (enrollment status, tool usage frequency, prior AI training) so responses can be segmented by actual undergraduate experience level before the literacy items begin
  • Closes with classification questions (year of study, field of study, age) enabling cross-tab analysis of AI literacy by academic background, and produces an auto-generated report from the collected data

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.