모든 템플릿

Edge Computing Reliability & Incident Response Benchmark

Benchmarks edge SLO/SLA maturity, failure handling patterns, and release safeguards for DevOps, SRE, and platform engineering teams managing edge workloads.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 27개 · 약 12분
Q01
메시지

Welcome! This survey explores edge reliability, failure handling, and release practices across teams and organizations. Please answer based on your current workload(s). There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest experience. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. Your responses are confidential, anonymized, and reported only in aggregate. Results will be used for benchmarking research. Estimated time: 8–10 minutes.

Q02
객관식

Do you currently work with, manage, or make technical decisions about edge computing workloads?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
객관식

Which edge use cases are you currently working on? Select all that apply.

  • IoT/IIoT telemetry or control
  • Video analytics or computer vision
  • AR/VR or real-time interaction
  • Retail POS or in-store systems
  • Gaming or real-time multiplayer
  • AI/ML inference at the edge
  • Content delivery or CDN workers
  • Offline-first mobile/web
  • Autonomous/robotics
  • Industrial gateways
  • Other (please specify)
Q04
드롭다운

What overall availability target do you aim for on your most critical edge paths?

  • No formal target
  • < 99% (less than two 9s)
  • 99% (two 9s)
  • 99.5%
  • 99.9% (three 9s)
  • 99.95%
  • 99.99% (four 9s)
  • 99.999%+ (five 9s or higher)
Q05
객관식

In the past 90 days, which failure modes affected your edge workload? Select all that occurred.

  • Network partition or high packet loss
  • DNS or CDN routing issues
  • Cold starts or warmup delays
  • Certificate expiry or clock drift
  • Configuration drift/mismatch
  • Cache inconsistency or stale data
  • Device resource exhaustion (CPU/RAM/storage)
  • Upstream dependency outage
  • Datastore write conflicts
  • Inconsistent model versions at edge
  • Timeout/retry storms
  • OTA/update failure
  • None of the above
Q06
객관식

Which signals do you actively monitor for edge reliability? Select all that apply.

  • Latency percentiles (p50/p95/p99)
  • Success/error rate
  • Cold start rate
  • Cache hit ratio
  • Sync backlog size or queue depth
  • Device heartbeat/uptime
  • Resource usage (CPU/memory/disk)
  • TLS/cert errors
  • Offline duration per device/site
  • Version drift across sites
  • Custom business KPIs
  • Other (please specify)
Q07
드롭다운

How often do you deploy changes to edge components?

  • On every commit (continuous deployment)
  • Daily
  • Weekly
  • Biweekly
  • Monthly
  • Less often
Q08
순위 매기기

Rank the following areas by where investment would most reduce edge incidents for your team next quarter (most impactful at top).

  1. Observability/monitoring
  2. Pre-release testing at edge
  3. Release safeguards (flags/canary/rollback)
  4. Resilience patterns for offline/intermittent
  5. Capacity and performance tuning
  6. Runbooks/automation and on-call training
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q09
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to explore your edge reliability practices in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your experience.

Q10
드롭다운

What is your primary role?

  • Backend/Platform engineer
  • Mobile/Web app engineer
  • SRE/DevOps
  • Data/ML engineer
  • Edge/Embedded engineer
  • Engineering manager/Tech lead
  • Other (please specify)
Q11
메시지

Thank you for participating! Your input helps advance understanding of edge reliability practices across the industry. Results will be shared in aggregate form.

Q12
드롭다운

What is the primary runtime or environment for your edge workload?

  • Serverless at edge (e.g., CDN workers)
  • Embedded Linux on device
  • RTOS / microcontroller
  • On-prem edge gateway/appliance
  • Containers on edge (e.g., K8s at edge)
  • Mobile app (native/hybrid) with edge logic
  • Browser service worker
  • Other (please specify)
Q13
객관식

Do you maintain SLIs/SLOs specifically for edge components?

  • Yes, for most edge components
  • Yes, for critical paths only
  • Partially defined
  • No
  • Not sure
Q14
객관식

Which patterns do you use to handle intermittent connectivity? Select all that apply.

  • Write-behind with background sync
  • CRDTs or conflict-free merges
  • Local-first storage with reconciliation
  • Event sourcing with replay
  • Queued writes with exponential backoff
  • Graceful degradation / limited offline mode
  • Block writes until online
  • None of the above
  • Other (please specify)
Q15
의견 척도

How effective are your current alerts at promptly detecting edge incidents?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all effective최대:Extremely effective
Q16
객관식

Which of the following pre-release practices do you perform for edge deployments? Select all that apply.

  • Integration tests against edge environment
  • Load/performance testing at edge
  • Chaos/fault injection testing
  • Connectivity/offline simulation testing
  • Security/compliance scans
  • Manual QA or smoke tests
  • None of the above
  • Other (please specify)
Q17
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts about your edge reliability challenges, priorities, or anything we may have missed.

Q18
드롭다운

How many years have you worked with edge workloads?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • More than 10 years
Q19
드롭다운

What is your typical end-to-end latency target (p95) for critical edge requests?

  • < 10 ms
  • 10–50 ms
  • 50–100 ms
  • 100–250 ms
  • 250–500 ms
  • 500 ms–1 s
  • > 1 s
  • No defined target
Q20
순위 매기기

When a major edge degradation occurs, rank your team's typical response actions in the order you would perform them (first action at top).

  1. Rollback or disable via feature flag
  2. Shift traffic to cloud fallback
  3. Degrade UX gracefully (reduced functionality)
  4. Increase cache TTL / serve stale on error
  5. Apply backpressure / tighter rate limits
  6. Trip circuit breakers to isolate faults
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q21
객관식

Which safeguards are part of your edge release process? Select all that apply.

  • Feature flags
  • Staged rollouts
  • Canary by PoP/region/site
  • Auto-rollback on SLO breach
  • Policy checks in CI/CD
  • Two-person review/approval
  • Signed releases/attestations
  • SBOM/vulnerability scan gates
  • None of the above
  • Other (please specify)
Q22
드롭다운

How many employees are in your organization?

  • 1–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–5,000
  • 5,001–10,000
  • 10,001+
Q23
드롭다운

What is your typical acceptable error rate target for edge services?

  • < 0.01%
  • 0.01–0.1%
  • 0.1–0.5%
  • 0.5–1%
  • 1–5%
  • > 5%
  • No defined target
Q24
드롭다운

What is your organization's primary industry?

  • Technology
  • Retail/E-commerce
  • Manufacturing
  • Media/Gaming
  • Telecom
  • Transportation/Logistics
  • Healthcare
  • Finance
  • Public sector
  • Other (please specify)
Q25
드롭다운

At approximately what end-user error rate would you typically trigger a rollback for an edge change?

  • < 0.1%
  • 0.1–0.5%
  • 0.5–1%
  • 1–2%
  • 2–5%
  • > 5%
  • No defined rollback threshold
  • It depends on the service/path
Q26
객관식

In which regions do you primarily operate edge workloads? Select all that apply.

  • North America
  • Europe
  • APAC
  • LATAM
  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • Global/multi-region
Q27
드롭다운

Approximately how many active edge sites or devices do you manage?

  • 1–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–10,000
  • 10,001–100,000
  • 100,001+

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.

차별화 포인트

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview step that adaptively probes deeper into a respondent's SLO/SLA maturity and incident-response practices, something static form builders cannot do
  • Combines structured measurement (SLO targets, latency/error-rate thresholds, rollback triggers) with ranking questions on response priorities and investment areas, giving both quantitative benchmarking and prioritization data
  • Captures failure-mode history, connectivity-handling patterns, monitoring signals, and release safeguards in single-select and multi-select formats purpose-built for DevOps/SRE/platform engineering respondents
  • Ends with an open-text reflection question and role/experience/industry/region segmentation fields, enabling segmented, auto-generated reporting without manual tallying

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.