Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
Course Communication & Support Effectiveness Survey
Measures student perceptions of messaging timeliness, channel preference, and support quality in online or fintech cohort programs to identify actionable communication improvements.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 21개 · 약 10분
Q02
객관식
During this course, which one channel did you use most often for course updates?
- LMS announcements
- Slack/Discord
- WhatsApp/Telegram
- In-app notifications
- Other (please specify)
Q03
객관식
Which support resources did you use during this course? Select all that apply.
- Live Q&A sessions
- Instructor office hours
- Discussion forum
- 1:1 mentor/support
- Support ticket/help desk
- Peer study groups
- Course FAQ/Docs
- Other (please specify)
- None of the above
Q04
의견 척도
Overall, the course communication and support met my needs.
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q05
AI 인터뷰
Thinking about your experience with communication and support during this course, what worked especially well for you, and what would you most want to see improved?
Q06
드롭다운
What is your age group?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55+
- Prefer not to say
Q07
메시지
Thank you for your time — your feedback helps us improve future cohorts!
Q08
의견 척도
Overall, how timely were course updates during this cohort?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all timely최대:Extremely timely
Q09
드롭다운
Approximately how many support requests did you submit during this course?
- 0 (none)
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- More than 10
Q10
의견 척도
To what extent did the course's communication and support contribute to your learning experience?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all최대:To a great extent
Q11
장문형
Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about course communication or support?
Q12
객관식
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
Q13
의견 척도
How clear were the instructions in course announcements and messages?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all clear최대:Extremely clear
Q14
의견 척도
How would you rate the speed of staff responses to your questions or requests during this course?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very slow최대:Very fast
Q15
의견 척도
How likely are you to recommend this course to a peer, based on the communication and support experience?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q16
드롭다운
Where are you primarily based?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Latin America
- Middle East
- North America
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
Q17
순위 매기기
Please rank your preferred channels for routine course updates (drag to reorder; top = most preferred).
- LMS announcements
- Slack/Discord
- SMS/Text
- In-app notifications
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q18
의견 척도
Thinking about issues or problems you raised during this course, how often were they resolved to your satisfaction?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Never최대:Always
Q19
드롭다운
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- High school or equivalent
- Some college
- Bachelor's degree
- Master's degree
- Doctorate
- Professional certification
- Prefer not to say
Q20
드롭다운
What is your current employment status?
- Full-time
- Part-time
- Self-employed
- Student
- Not employed
- Prefer not to say
Q21
드롭다운
How many years have you worked in fintech, if any?
- No experience
- Less than 1 year
- 1–3 years
- 4–7 years
- 8+ years
- Prefer not to say
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that probes deeper into students' communication and support experiences beyond fixed-choice answers
- Combines channel-preference ranking, response-speed and issue-resolution ratings, and satisfaction/likelihood-to-recommend scales in one flow
- Captures both quantitative timeliness/clarity ratings and an open-text reflection question, plus demographic and employment context (relevant for fintech cohorts)
- Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report turn raw answers into actionable communication-improvement insights without manual analysis
Jotform
Communication for college students survey Form TemplateA ready-to-use static form template targeting student communication feedback, so it's directly comparable in audience and topic. It relies on fixed question fields with Jotform's standard form-builder customization rather than any adaptive interviewing. Good for quick, low-cost deployment but limited for deeper qualitative insight.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built for the college/student communication use case
- Easy drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform's form builder
- Free-to-use template as a starting point
아쉬운 점
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into individual responses
- No built-in automated quality scoring or auto-generated analytical report
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
QuestionPro
Course evaluation sample questions and survey templateThis is a broader course/teacher evaluation template rather than one focused specifically on communication and support channels, but it overlaps enough in audience (students evaluating a course) to be a reasonable comparison. It's a static, fielding-ready survey template built on QuestionPro's standard question types. It doesn't concentrate on messaging timeliness or support-channel preference the way a dedicated communication survey would.
잘하는 점
- Established course/teacher evaluation template with broad applicability
- Supports standard survey question types and QuestionPro's analytics dashboard
- Positioned for general classroom/course settings, not just online cohorts
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI-driven follow-up interview to dig into low ratings or specific complaints
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
- No optional voice AI interview or guided task with screen share
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.