Employee DEI Pulse: Belonging, Inclusion & Equity
Measures employee perceptions of belonging, psychological safety, fairness, and inclusive practices. Designed for quarterly or monthly pulse deployment with confidential, anonymized responses to inform organizational DEI strategy.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In the last 30 days, I felt a strong sense of belonging on my team.
Performance evaluations that affected me in the last 6 months were fair.
Thinking about the last 60 days, please indicate your agreement: My manager actively seeks out and values diverse perspectives in team discussions.
Based on your overall experience in the last 90 days, how likely are you to recommend this organization as an inclusive place to work?
The following questions help us understand experiences across different groups. All are optional, and responses are reported only in aggregate to protect anonymity.
Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. Your feedback directly informs our inclusion and equity priorities. If anything in this survey raised concerns you'd like to discuss, please reach out to [HR contact / Employee Assistance Program].
In the last 30 days, I felt safe to raise concerns or disagreements without fearing negative consequences.
In the last 30 days, workload was distributed fairly within my team.
In the last 60 days, my colleagues treated me with respect regardless of my background or identity.
Name one change your team or organization could make in the next month that would help you feel more included.
What is your primary department or function?
- Engineering / IT
- Product
- Sales
- Marketing
- Operations
- HR / People
- Finance
- Customer Support
- Legal
- Other
- Prefer not to say
In the last 3 months, did you experience or witness exclusionary behavior at work?
- Yes, experienced directly
- Yes, witnessed
- No
- Prefer not to say
Compared with peers in similar roles, how fairly are you rewarded overall (compensation, recognition, and benefits)?
- Much less fairly
- Somewhat less fairly
- About the same
- Somewhat more fairly
- Much more fairly
- Prefer not to say
In the last 60 days, my ideas and contributions were given fair consideration in meetings and decisions.
Based on your survey responses, we'd like to explore your experiences with inclusion, fairness, and belonging in a bit more depth. Please share what's most on your mind, and our AI interviewer will ask a couple of follow-up questions.
How long have you worked at this organization?
- Less than 6 months
- 6–12 months
- 1–2 years
- 3–5 years
- 6–10 years
- More than 10 years
- Prefer not to say
If you experienced or witnessed exclusionary behavior, please briefly describe the situation. Avoid including names or identifying details.
In the last 6 months, which of the following have you experienced regarding access to growth opportunities? (Select all that apply.)
- I had equal access to high-visibility projects
- My development or training requests were supported
- I received mentorship or sponsorship opportunities
- I lacked access to stretch assignments
- I was passed over for opportunities without clear reasons
- Not sure / None of these apply
Rank the following areas from most to least impactful for improving your experience of inclusion.
- Manager support and advocacy
- Transparent decision-making
- Work-life flexibility
- Career development and growth paths
- Pay equity and recognition
What is your current work arrangement?
- On-site
- Hybrid
- Remote
- Prefer not to say
Are you a people manager?
- Yes
- No
- Prefer not to say
What is your primary work location region?
- Americas
- EMEA
- APAC
- Other
- Prefer not to say
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
If you selected 'Prefer to self-describe,' please share how you describe your gender.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes respondents' inclusion experiences based on their specific survey answers, rather than a fixed question list
- Covers belonging, psychological safety, and fairness with dedicated opinion-scale items on evaluations, workload distribution, compensation, and manager inclusive behavior
- Uses a ranking exercise plus open-text questions so employees can prioritize improvement areas and describe exclusionary incidents or suggested changes in their own words
- Collects demographic dropdowns (department, tenure, work arrangement, manager status, region, gender with a self-describe option) to enable cross-group equity analysis while keeping responses confidential and anonymized
QuestionPro
Employee pulse sample questionnaire and survey templateA sample questionnaire covering general employee pulse topics (engagement, satisfaction) rather than a DEI/belonging-specific instrument. It's presented as a static question list to adapt manually, backed by QuestionPro's broader survey and analytics platform. Useful as a starting reference but not purpose-built for measuring belonging, fairness, or inclusion.
잘하는 점
- Established survey platform with reporting and analytics tools
- Sample questions can be customized for various pulse survey use cases
- Backed by a mature enterprise survey feature set
아쉬운 점
- Static questionnaire with no adaptive AI follow-up probing
- No DEI/belonging-specific question set out of the box
- No published methodology on how questions were designed or scored
SurveyMonkey
Pulse Survey TemplateA general-purpose employee pulse template focused on quick, recurring sentiment checks rather than DEI-specific belonging or fairness measurement. It's a ready-to-deploy static form supported by SurveyMonkey's well-known dashboard and reporting tools. Teams would need to substantially customize it to address inclusion, equity, or exclusionary-behavior topics.
잘하는 점
- Simple, quick-to-deploy template with familiar UI
- Strong built-in reporting and dashboard visualization
- Wide adoption and easy distribution across teams
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interview or voice AI follow-up capability
- No automated per-response quality scoring
- Generic pulse content, not tailored to belonging/equity/fairness dimensions
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.