QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

360 Peer Evaluation & Working Relationship Survey

A structured peer-review template for 360-degree feedback cycles — covering core collaboration competencies, an overall effectiveness rating, and a best-worst prioritization of development areas — plus an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the concrete incident behind the rating so feedback isn't just a number. Built for HR, people ops, and team leads running peer review cycles.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking part in this peer review cycle! Your responses help your colleague grow and are typically shared in aggregate or lightly anonymized, depending on your organization's policy. This will take about 6-7 minutes. Please be specific and constructive.

Q02
객관식필수

What is your working relationship with [peer's name]?

  • I work on the same team as them
  • I work with them across teams/departments
  • They report to me
  • I report to them
  • Other
Q03
매트릭스필수

Based on your interactions in the last review period, how often has this person demonstrated the following?

5개 행 × 4개 열
  • Communicates clearly and proactively
  • Collaborates well with others on shared work
  • Delivers reliable, high-quality output
  • Takes initiative without being asked
  • Handles disagreement or setbacks constructively
열: Rarely · Sometimes · Usually · Almost Always
Q04
의견 척도필수

Overall, how effective has this person been in their role over the last review period?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not effective at all최대:Extremely effective
Q05
객관식필수

In the last 3 months, how often did this person deliver agreed-upon work on time without needing reminders?

  • Never
  • Rarely
  • Sometimes
  • Often
  • Always
  • Not applicable — we haven't shared deadlines
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

If this person could focus on developing only one skill area next quarter, which would have the biggest impact — and which would matter least right now?

  • Written and verbal communication
  • Cross-team collaboration
  • Time management and prioritization
  • Technical or domain expertise
  • Leadership and mentoring others
  • Adaptability under changing priorities
  • Strategic, big-picture thinking
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Would help most최악:Would help least
Q07
장문형

Describe one specific situation where this person performed especially well. What happened, and what was the outcome?

Q08
장문형

Describe one specific situation where this person could have handled things better. What would you suggest they do differently?

Q09
객관식필수

Would you want to work with this person again on a future project?

  • Yes, definitely
  • Probably
  • Unsure
  • Probably not
  • No
Q10
AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind the overall effectiveness rating the respondent gave. Ask them to walk through the single most memorable interaction or project with this person that shaped that score, including what specifically happened and what the impact was. If the rating was low (0-5) or they said they wouldn't want to work with the person again, gently dig into whether this is a one-off incident or a recurring pattern, and what — if anything — would need to change. If the rating was high (9-10), ask what this person does that others on the team don't.

Q11
객관식

How long have you worked with this person?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3-12 months
  • 1-2 years
  • More than 2 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

Which best describes your own role level relative to this person?

  • Peer / same level
  • More senior
  • More junior
  • Different function, not comparable
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

All done — thank you for the thoughtful feedback! Your responses will be combined with others' and shared with this person's manager as part of this review cycle, following your organization's feedback-sharing policy.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a single peer-evaluation form by pairing structured competency ratings (matrix, opinion scale, on-time delivery) with a best-worst max-diff prioritization of development areas, so results are ranked, not just scored.
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that specifically probes the reasoning behind the overall effectiveness rating, reconstructing the concrete incident behind the number instead of leaving it as an unexplained score.
  • Captures relationship context (working relationship, tenure, relative role level) alongside two open-ended critical-incident questions, giving reviewers structured qualitative evidence, not just ratings.
  • Built specifically for HR/people-ops peer review cycles, with a closing message confirming responses will be combined into a report, rather than being a generic evaluation form repurposed for peer review.

Jotform

Create Free Peer Evaluation Forms - Peer Evaluation Form Templates

A library of ready-to-use peer evaluation form templates aimed at general HR use, with drag-and-drop customization. It's a form-builder gallery rather than a single structured 360 instrument, so depth and consistency across templates likely vary. Good for quick deployment, less suited to standardized multi-rater review cycles.

잘하는 점

  • Free to use and quick to customize with a drag-and-drop builder
  • Wide variety of pre-built peer evaluation templates to choose from
  • Easy integration into existing HR workflows via forms

아쉬운 점

  • Static form fields only — no adaptive follow-up interview to probe the reasoning behind a rating
  • No built-in mechanism to reconstruct specific incidents behind scores; relies on whatever open text fields are manually added
  • No published methodology for how templates ensure comparability across raters in a formal 360 cycle

Typeform

Peer Evaluation Form Template

A single conversational-style peer evaluation template with Typeform's signature one-question-at-a-time UX, which makes it pleasant to fill out. It's a fixed set of questions, though, without any structured prioritization mechanism (like best-worst ranking) or a way to dig deeper into a given answer. Suited to lightweight peer feedback rather than a full 360 cycle with development-area prioritization.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface improves completion experience
  • Simple to launch as a standalone peer feedback form
  • Mobile-friendly design typical of Typeform templates

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview — every respondent sees the same fixed question set regardless of their answers
  • No best-worst/max-diff style prioritization to force-rank development areas
  • No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses or auto-generated synthesis report

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기