QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Course Evaluation: Teaching Effectiveness & Workload

Collects structured student feedback on instructor effectiveness, course materials, workload balance, and learning outcomes to inform end-of-term course improvements at the undergraduate or graduate level.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 29개 · 약 12분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to this end-of-term course evaluation. Your responses will help improve instruction, materials, and workload balance for future students. This survey is voluntary and anonymous — your individual responses will not be shared with the instructor and will only be reported in aggregate. There are no right or wrong answers; we are interested in your honest opinions. The survey takes approximately 8–10 minutes to complete. You may stop at any time.

Q02
객관식

How was this course primarily delivered this term?

  • In-person
  • Hybrid
  • Online (synchronous/live)
  • Online (asynchronous/self-paced)
  • Other
Q03
의견 척도

Overall, how effective was the instructor this term?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all effective최대:Extremely effective
Q04
의견 척도

How helpful were the required readings and textbooks for this course?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all helpful최대:Extremely helpful
Q05
드롭다운

Outside of scheduled class time, approximately how many hours per week did you spend on this course?

  • 0–2 hours
  • 3–5 hours
  • 6–8 hours
  • 9–11 hours
  • 12–15 hours
  • 16 or more hours
Q06
의견 척도

How fair was the grading in this course?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very unfair최대:Very fair
Q07
장문형

What aspect of this course most supported your learning?

Q08
드롭다운

What is your age?

  • 17 or younger
  • 18–20
  • 21–24
  • 25–34
  • 35 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback is anonymous and will be used to improve this course for future terms.

Q10
객관식

How often did this class meet live (in-person or online) each week?

  • Once
  • Twice
  • Three times
  • Four or more
  • Not applicable (fully asynchronous)
Q11
의견 척도

The instructor communicated course content clearly.

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q12
의견 척도

How helpful were the lecture slides or notes?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all helpful최대:Extremely helpful
Q13
객관식

Compared to your other courses this term, the workload for this course was:

  • Much lighter
  • Slightly lighter
  • About the same
  • Slightly heavier
  • Much heavier
Q14
의견 척도

I achieved the intended learning outcomes for this course.

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q15
장문형

What, if anything, should be improved for future terms?

Q16
객관식

What is your gender identity?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
의견 척도

The instructor was well-prepared for class sessions.

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q18
의견 척도

How helpful were the online resources (e.g., LMS content, videos, supplementary links)?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all helpful최대:Extremely helpful
Q19
객관식

How would you describe the pace of this course?

  • Much too slow
  • Somewhat too slow
  • About right
  • Somewhat too fast
  • Much too fast
Q20
의견 척도

How likely are you to recommend this course to another student?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q21
AI 인터뷰

Based on the feedback you've shared, we'd like to explore a few of your responses in more detail.

Q22
드롭다운

What is your current year or level of study?

  • First year
  • Second year
  • Third year
  • Fourth year
  • Fifth year or beyond
  • Graduate
  • Other
Q23
의견 척도

The instructor was responsive to student questions and concerns.

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q24
의견 척도

How well did the course materials support the stated learning objectives?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all well최대:Extremely well
Q25
순위 매기기

Rank the following activities by how much time you spent on them outside of class, from most to least time.

  1. Reading or reviewing materials
  2. Completing assignments or homework
  3. Studying for exams or quizzes
  4. Working on projects or papers
  5. Participating in study groups or discussions
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q26
드롭다운

Which best describes your primary field of study?

  • Arts & Humanities
  • Social Sciences
  • Natural Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Business
  • Health & Medicine
  • Education
  • Computer Science/IT
  • Other
Q27
의견 척도

The instructor provided timely and useful feedback on assignments.

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q28
객관식

What is your enrollment status this term?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Prefer not to say
Q29
객관식

Are you a domestic or international student?

  • Domestic student
  • International student
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that probes deeper into specific student responses (e.g., clarifying what 'improved' or 'unclear' feedback actually means) instead of leaving low scores unexplained.
  • Separately measures instructor effectiveness (clarity, preparedness, responsiveness, feedback timeliness), materials helpfulness (readings, slides, online resources), and workload/pace, so end-of-term reports can pinpoint exactly what needs to change.
  • Includes a ranking question on how out-of-class time is actually spent and a workload-hours dropdown, giving administrators concrete workload data rather than a single generic 'workload' rating.
  • Captures demographic and enrollment context (year of study, field of study, enrollment status, domestic/international) so results can be segmented, alongside open-text questions on what supported learning and what should improve.

Jotform

Online Course Instructor Feedback Form Template

A ready-to-use, customizable form focused on instructor feedback for online courses, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's fielding-ready but appears scoped mainly to instructor performance rather than the fuller mix of materials, workload, and outcomes. Like most Jotform templates, it's a static question set with no adaptive follow-up logic.

잘하는 점

  • Easy to customize within Jotform's widely-used form builder
  • Focused specifically on instructor feedback, which keeps it simple to deploy
  • Benefits from Jotform's broad integrations and form-sharing ecosystem

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — every respondent sees the same fixed fields
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated analysis report
  • Narrower scope (instructor-only) versus a full teaching effectiveness, materials, and workload evaluation

QuestionPro

Course evaluation sample questions and survey template

A sample-questions-and-template page covering course and teacher evaluation, useful as a question bank and starting point for building a survey in QuestionPro. It reads partly as a guide with example items rather than a single polished, ready-to-field instrument. Standard multiple-choice/rating format with no mention of adaptive interviewing.

잘하는 점

  • Broad sample question bank covering both course and teacher evaluation angles
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey platform and analytics dashboard
  • Flexible for researchers wanting to pick and choose items to build their own version

아쉬운 점

  • Presented as sample questions/guide content rather than one turnkey, fielding-ready template
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interviews or voice-based interviewing
  • No transparent, published prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of open responses

SurveyMonkey

Training Course Evaluation Template: Questions & Feedback Guide

Positioned as a general training-course evaluation template with guidance on question design, more oriented toward corporate/professional training than undergraduate or graduate academic courses. It's usable as a static survey but the framing and question guide are less tailored to academic instructor effectiveness and grading fairness. No adaptive interviewing is offered.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's mature survey infrastructure and reporting dashboards
  • Includes guidance/context on question design, not just a bare question list
  • Easy to launch quickly for organizations already on SurveyMonkey

아쉬운 점

  • Framed around workplace/training evaluation rather than academic course evaluation specifics like grading fairness or learning outcomes
  • Fixed, static question set with no adaptive AI probing of individual student responses
  • No AI-generated qualitative analysis or automated response quality scoring

SurveySparrow

Sample Course Evaluation Form Template

A conversational-style, fielding-ready course evaluation form built on SurveySparrow's chat-like UI, covering general course feedback. It leans toward a friendlier presentation layer rather than deep, structured coverage of instructor effectiveness, materials, and workload separately. No adaptive interviewing or voice-based follow-up is indicated.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational UI style may improve completion rates versus traditional grid forms
  • Ready to deploy quickly for basic course feedback collection
  • Part of SurveySparrow's broader survey and NPS tooling ecosystem

아쉬운 점

  • Conversational format is still a fixed script — no dynamic AI-generated follow-up questions based on what a student actually says
  • No automated quality scoring of open-text responses or AI-authored summary reports
  • Less granular breakdown of materials (readings vs. slides vs. online resources) than a dedicated teaching-effectiveness instrument

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기