모든 템플릿

Resident Trust & Accountability in Local Government

Measures resident perceptions of trust, fairness, transparency, and accountability in local public services. Designed for municipal governments and civic organizations seeking actionable feedback to improve governance and resident relations.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 26개 · 약 11분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to this survey about your experiences with local government. This survey is conducted to understand how residents view the trust, fairness, transparency, and accountability of local public services. Your participation is completely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. The survey takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. By continuing, you confirm that you are at least 18 years old and consent to participate.

Q02
객관식

Do you currently live in the city, town, or county this survey is about?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
객관식

In the past 12 months, have you interacted with any local public service (for example, permits, sanitation, schools, health clinics, public safety, or housing)?

  • Yes
  • No
Q04
의견 척도

Overall, how much do you trust your local government to do what is right for residents?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all최대:Completely
Q05
의견 척도

Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with each statement about your local government. "My local government treats all residents fairly, regardless of their background."

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q06
의견 척도

How transparent is your local government about how decisions are made and how public funds are spent?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all transparent최대:Completely transparent
Q07
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, if you could change one thing to make local government fairer, more transparent, or more accountable, what would it be?

Q08
드롭다운

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are confidential and will be used in aggregate to help improve local public services. If you have questions about this study, please contact [research team email].

Q10
의견 척도

Thinking about your most recent interaction with a local public service, please indicate how much you agree or disagree: "I was treated with courtesy and respect."

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q11
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with the overall quality of services provided by your local government?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q12
의견 척도

"Residents have a meaningful say in local government decisions."

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q13
객관식

In the past 6 months, which sources have you used to get information from your local government? Select all that apply.

  • City/municipal website
  • Social media (official government accounts)
  • Local news outlets (TV, radio, newspaper)
  • Community meetings or town halls
  • 311/helpline or service app
  • Email or text alerts/newsletters
  • Friends, family, or neighbors
  • Other (please specify)
  • None — I have not sought information
Q14
AI 인터뷰

Thank you for your responses so far. We'd like to explore a few of your thoughts in more depth. An AI moderator will ask you up to 2 short follow-up questions — please respond as openly as you like.

Q15
객관식

What is your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
의견 척도

"The process was straightforward and easy to follow."

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q17
장문형

What, if anything, most influences your level of trust in local government — whether positively or negatively? Please share any specific examples.

Q18
의견 척도

"Local officials listen to and care about residents' concerns."

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q19
순위 매기기

From the list below, rank the three actions that would do the most to improve local government accountability (drag to reorder; 1 = most helpful).

  1. Publish clear performance dashboards
  2. Stronger independent audits and oversight
  3. Simpler, faster complaint and appeals process
  4. Publish detailed spending and contracts
  5. More participatory budgeting and resident input
  6. Open data on services and outcomes
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q20
드롭다운

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college / associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Postgraduate degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
의견 척도

"I received a response within a reasonable time."

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q22
의견 척도

"Decision-making processes give all neighborhoods and communities equal attention."

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q23
의견 척도

How confident are you that local officials are held accountable when mistakes or misconduct occur?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all confident최대:Completely confident
Q24
객관식

Which best describes the area where you live?

  • Urban center
  • Suburban area
  • Small town
  • Rural area
  • Prefer not to say
Q25
의견 척도

"I was treated fairly regardless of my background."

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q26
의견 척도

"The outcome or next steps were clearly explained to me."

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a series of opinion-scale statements specifically isolating fairness, responsiveness, transparency, and accountability rather than a single blended satisfaction score
  • Features an AI follow-up interview segment that can probe deeper into residents' stated reasons for trust or distrust, going beyond fixed-choice responses
  • Includes a ranking question asking residents to prioritize the top actions that would improve trust, giving municipalities directly actionable priorities
  • Closes with open-text questions on what most influences trust and what one change residents would make, paired with demographic breakdowns (age, gender, education, area type) for segmented analysis

Jotform

Resident Feedback Form Template

This is a static, customizable form template built on Jotform's general form-builder platform, aimed at collecting general resident feedback. It's easy to embed and edit but is not structured as a research instrument with validated trust/accountability constructs. No adaptive interviewing or automated analysis is described.

잘하는 점

  • Highly customizable drag-and-drop form fields
  • Easy embedding and integration with Jotform's broader form ecosystem
  • Simple setup for basic feedback collection

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing based on individual answers
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated analysis reports
  • No published methodology or prompt transparency, since it's a form builder, not an interview platform

SurveyMonkey

Resident Satisfaction Survey Template

A standard fielding-ready survey template focused on resident satisfaction with local services. It benefits from SurveyMonkey's established survey logic and distribution tools but relies on fixed question paths rather than dynamic follow-up. Useful for broad satisfaction tracking rather than deep qualitative exploration of trust drivers.

잘하는 점

  • Established survey platform with reliable distribution and reporting tools
  • Pre-built satisfaction-focused question set ready to field quickly
  • Familiar interface for municipal staff already using SurveyMonkey

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up questions tailored to individual responses
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • No automated response-quality scoring or transparent AI prompt documentation

SurveySparrow

Resident Satisfaction Survey Template

SurveySparrow offers a conversational, chat-style survey format for resident satisfaction, which can feel more engaging than a traditional form. However, the conversational flow is scripted rather than AI-adaptive, meaning follow-up questions don't dynamically change based on open-text answer content. It's a ready-to-field template but not an interview-based research tool.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-like survey experience that may improve completion rates
  • Ready-to-use template tailored to resident satisfaction topics
  • Mobile-friendly presentation format

아쉬운 점

  • Conversational UI is scripted, not adaptive AI probing based on respondent answers
  • No voice AI interview capability or guided task/screen-share functionality
  • No automated quality scoring or transparent prompt-level methodology disclosed

Typeform

Resident Satisfaction Survey Template

Typeform provides a polished, one-question-at-a-time survey template well-suited for resident satisfaction tracking, with conditional logic for branching. It is a static, pre-scripted questionnaire rather than an AI-driven interview, so it cannot probe unexpected answers in real time. Good for aesthetics and basic logic branching, less suited for deep qualitative trust analysis.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, engaging one-question-at-a-time interface
  • Conditional logic branching based on prior answers
  • Strong template design and ease of distribution

아쉬운 점

  • Logic branching is pre-scripted, not adaptive AI follow-up generated in real time
  • No voice AI interview option or automated per-response quality scoring
  • No transparent AI prompt methodology, since it's a form-logic tool rather than an AI interviewer

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.