모든 템플릿

AI Adoption in Higher Education

A research survey exploring how faculty and students adopt, perceive, and experience AI tools in higher education settings. Covers current usage patterns, perceived benefits and barriers, institutional policy awareness, training needs, and impact on teaching and learning outcomes.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 32개 · 약 13분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to this research survey on AI tools in higher education. This study explores how faculty and students experience artificial intelligence tools in academic settings. Your responses will help researchers understand current usage patterns, perceptions, and institutional contexts. • Participation is entirely voluntary. You may stop at any time. • There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions and experiences. • Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. • This survey takes approximately 12–15 minutes to complete. • Results will be used for academic research purposes. By continuing, you indicate that you have read this information and consent to participate.

Q02
객관식

Are you currently affiliated with a higher education institution as a faculty member, instructor, or enrolled student?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
객관식

Which of the following best describes your primary role at your institution?

  • Full-time faculty / professor
  • Part-time / adjunct faculty
  • Graduate teaching assistant
  • Postdoctoral researcher
  • Undergraduate student
  • Graduate student (Master's)
  • Graduate student (Doctoral)
  • Staff with teaching responsibilities
  • Other (please specify)
Q04
객관식

Which of the following AI tools have you used in the past 12 months for academic purposes? (Select all that apply)

  • ChatGPT / OpenAI tools
  • Google Gemini
  • Microsoft Copilot
  • Claude (Anthropic)
  • Grammarly AI features
  • Quillbot
  • DALL-E / Midjourney / AI image generators
  • GitHub Copilot / AI coding assistants
  • AI-powered research tools (e.g., Elicit, Semantic Scholar, Consensus)
  • AI transcription or note-taking tools (e.g., Otter.ai)
  • AI-powered learning platforms (e.g., Khan Academy AI, Duolingo AI)
  • Other (please specify)
  • I have not used any AI tools for academic purposes
Q05
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree that AI tools improve the quality of your academic work?

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q06
의견 척도

How concerned are you about the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated content?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all concerned최대:Extremely concerned
Q07
의견 척도

To what extent are you aware of your institution's policies on AI tool use in academic settings?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all aware최대:Fully aware
Q08
의견 척도

How confident do you feel in your ability to use AI tools effectively for academic purposes?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q09
의견 척도

Overall, how would you rate the impact of AI tools on the quality of teaching and learning at your institution?

척도: 17
최소:Very negative impact최대:Very positive impact
Q10
AI 인터뷰

Tell us about a specific experience where an AI tool significantly affected your teaching or learning. What happened, and how did it shape your view of AI in education?

Q11
장문형

Based on your responses throughout this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about AI tools in higher education that we may not have covered.

Q12
드롭다운

What is your age range?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are valuable to understanding AI adoption in higher education. Your answers are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. If you have any questions about this research, please contact the research team at the email address provided in your invitation.

Q14
드롭다운

What is your primary academic discipline or field of study?

  • Arts & Humanities
  • Biological Sciences
  • Business & Management
  • Computer Science & Information Technology
  • Education
  • Engineering
  • Health Sciences & Medicine
  • Law
  • Mathematics & Statistics
  • Physical Sciences
  • Social Sciences
  • Other (please specify)
Q15
객관식

How frequently do you use AI tools for academic work?

  • Daily
  • Several times a week
  • About once a week
  • A few times a month
  • Less than once a month
  • I have tried AI tools but no longer use them
  • I have never used AI tools for academic work
Q16
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree that AI tools save you time on academic tasks?

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q17
의견 척도

How concerned are you about academic integrity issues related to AI tool use?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all concerned최대:Extremely concerned
Q18
객관식

Does your institution have a formal, written policy on the use of AI tools in teaching or coursework?

  • Yes, a comprehensive policy
  • Yes, but it is limited or partial
  • No formal policy exists
  • I don't know
Q19
객관식

How much formal training have you received on using AI tools for academic work?

  • No formal training
  • Brief introduction (e.g., a single workshop or webinar)
  • Moderate training (e.g., multiple sessions or a short course)
  • Extensive training (e.g., a full course or certification)
  • I am self-taught through personal exploration
Q20
의견 척도

How likely are you to increase your use of AI tools for academic purposes in the next 12 months?

척도: 17
최소:Very unlikely최대:Very likely
Q21
드롭다운

What is your gender identity?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary / gender diverse
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
객관식

For which of the following academic tasks do you use AI tools? (Select all that apply)

  • Writing or editing papers / assignments
  • Literature review or research discovery
  • Generating ideas or brainstorming
  • Data analysis or coding
  • Creating presentations or visual materials
  • Studying or exam preparation
  • Developing course materials or syllabi
  • Grading or providing feedback
  • Translation or language assistance
  • Administrative tasks (scheduling, emails)
  • Other (please specify)
  • Not applicable — I do not use AI tools
Q23
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree that AI tools help you learn or understand new concepts?

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q24
의견 척도

How concerned are you about data privacy when using AI tools for academic purposes?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all concerned최대:Extremely concerned
Q25
의견 척도

How adequate do you find your institution's current AI policies for guiding your academic work?

척도: 17
최소:Completely inadequate최대:Completely adequate
Q26
객관식

Which of the following training formats would be most useful to you? (Select up to 3)

  • Self-paced online modules
  • Live workshops or seminars
  • Peer-led learning communities
  • One-on-one coaching or mentoring
  • Written guides or documentation
  • Video tutorials
  • Discipline-specific AI training sessions
  • Hands-on sandbox environments to practice
  • Other (please specify)
Q27
의견 척도

How likely are you to recommend AI tools to a colleague or fellow student for academic use?

척도: 17
최소:Very unlikely최대:Very likely
Q28
드롭다운

How many years have you been in your current role in higher education?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • 11–20 years
  • More than 20 years
Q29
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree that AI tools enhance creativity in your academic work?

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q30
의견 척도

How much of a barrier is the lack of clear institutional guidelines on AI use?

척도: 17
최소:Not a barrier at all최대:A very significant barrier
Q31
순위 매기기

Please rank the following training topics in order of priority for you, from most to least important.

  1. Prompt engineering and effective AI interaction
  2. Ethical use and academic integrity considerations
  3. AI tools for research and literature review
  4. AI for writing and content creation
  5. Data privacy and security with AI tools
  6. Evaluating and fact-checking AI outputs
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q32
드롭다운

Which best describes your institution type?

  • Research university (R1/R2)
  • Comprehensive / master's university
  • Liberal arts college
  • Community or technical college
  • Professional school (e.g., law, medical)
  • Online-only institution
  • Other (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.