모든 템플릿

Site Search UX Evaluation: Intent, Relevance & Filtering

Evaluates users' search experiences across intent expression, result relevance, and filter/sort usability to identify actionable improvements for product search, UX, and conversions.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 29개 · 약 12분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the Search Experience Survey. This survey takes approximately 13 minutes and asks about your most recent search session in the product. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to help us improve the search experience. Participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are simply interested in your honest opinions.

Q02
객관식

When did you last use the product's search feature?

  • Today
  • In the past 3 days
  • In the past 7 days
  • In the past 30 days
  • More than 30 days ago
  • I have never used the search feature
Q03
의견 척도

How confident were you that the words you typed accurately expressed what you were looking for?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q04
의견 척도

Overall, how relevant were the search results to what you were looking for?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all relevant최대:Extremely relevant
Q05
객관식

During that session, how often did you use filters or sorting controls?

  • I did not notice any filter or sorting controls
  • I noticed them but did not use them
  • Once
  • 2 to 3 times
  • More than 3 times
Q06
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with the overall search experience?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q07
객관식

Which of the following best describes your role?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Executive or leader
  • Other
Q08
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will directly inform improvements to our search experience.

Q09
객관식

What is the main reason you have not used the search feature recently?

  • I rely on browsing or navigation instead
  • Search does not meet my needs
  • It was not relevant to my recent tasks
  • I was not aware of the search feature
  • Past search results were not helpful
  • Other (please specify)
Q10
객관식

During that session, how many times did you rephrase or change your search query?

  • None
  • Once
  • 2 to 3 times
  • 4 or more times
Q11
객관식

Which of the following issues, if any, did you notice in the search results? (Select all that apply)

  • Results were too broad
  • Results were too narrow or specific
  • Results were out of date or stale
  • Duplicate results appeared
  • Low-quality sources were included
  • Language or locale mismatch
  • Results were behind paywalls or access restrictions
  • Missing key information or attributes
  • Irrelevant geographic results
  • No issues noticed
Q12
객관식

Which of the following filtering or sorting controls did you use? (Select all that apply)

  • Sort by relevance
  • Sort by date or time
  • Date range filter
  • Category or type filter
  • Price or cost filter
  • Rating or reviews filter
  • Location or distance filter
  • Availability or in-stock filter
  • Include or exclude specific sources
  • Advanced query operators
  • None of the above
Q13
의견 척도

How likely are you to recommend this product's search feature to a colleague?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q14
드롭다운

Which team or area do you primarily work in?

  • Engineering or Development
  • Data or Analytics
  • Product
  • Design or UX
  • Marketing
  • Sales or Business Development
  • Support or Customer Success
  • Operations
  • HR or Recruiting
  • Finance
  • Other
Q15
장문형

Briefly describe your most recent search task and what you hoped to find.

Q16
객관식

Did you use any auto-suggestions or query hints that appeared while typing?

  • Yes
  • No
  • I did not notice any suggestions
Q17
의견 척도

How useful were the titles, descriptions, and preview information shown in the results for judging whether a result was relevant?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all useful최대:Extremely useful
Q18
객관식

What were the main reasons you did not use filters or sorting? (Select all that apply)

  • Not needed for my task
  • Hard to find the controls
  • Unsure what each option does
  • Too many options to choose from
  • Takes too long to apply
  • Filters reset unexpectedly
  • Not available on my device
  • I prefer refining my search query instead
  • Other (please specify)
Q19
객관식

Which three areas would most improve your search experience? (Select up to 3)

  • Understanding what I'm looking for
  • Query suggestions and autocomplete
  • Ranking and relevance of results
  • Freshness and recency of results
  • Titles, descriptions, and previews
  • Filter and sort usability
  • Speed and performance
Q20
객관식

How often do you typically use the product's search feature?

  • Multiple times per day
  • Daily
  • A few times per week
  • A few times per month
  • Rarely
  • Never
Q21
장문형

What, if anything, made it difficult to express what you were looking for?

Q22
객관식

Approximately how many search results did you click on or open during that session?

  • 0
  • 1 to 2
  • 3 to 5
  • 6 to 10
  • More than 10
Q23
의견 척도

How effective were the filters or sorting controls in helping you find the right results?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all effective최대:Extremely effective
Q24
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to explore your search experience a bit further. An AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions based on your responses.

Q25
객관식

How long have you been using this product?

  • Less than 1 month
  • 1 to 3 months
  • 4 to 12 months
  • 1 to 2 years
  • 3 or more years
Q26
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts, suggestions, or concerns about the search experience.

Q27
객관식

What device do you primarily use when searching in this product?

  • Desktop or laptop
  • Tablet
  • Mobile phone
  • I use multiple devices equally
Q28
객관식

Which region are you based in?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Prefer not to say
Q29
객관식

What is your age group? (Optional)

  • Under 18
  • 18 to 24
  • 25 to 34
  • 35 to 44
  • 45 to 54
  • 55 to 64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Walks through the full search journey in one flow — intent framing, query rephrasing, auto-suggestion use, result relevance, and filter/sort usability — rather than treating search as a single generic question
  • Pairs opinion-scale metrics (confidence in query wording, result relevance, filter effectiveness, satisfaction, recommend-likelihood) with open-text prompts so you get both trackable scores and verbatim detail
  • Includes an optional AI moderator follow-up interview that can probe deeper into a respondent's actual search struggles instead of stopping at fixed-choice answers
  • Closes with role, team, tenure, device, and region segmentation plus an auto-generated report, so findings can be sliced by user type for product, UX, and conversion teams

Jotform

Search Results Report Form Template

This is a static drag-and-drop form for logging or reporting on search results rather than a structured UX-evaluation survey covering intent, relevance, and filtering as a set. It's fielding-ready in the sense that you can publish it immediately, but the scope looks narrower and more operational than a full search-experience study. Useful if you just need a lightweight capture form, less so for diagnosing why search underperforms.

잘하는 점

  • Quick to build and deploy using Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder
  • Free tier available, lowering the barrier to trying it
  • Fits into Jotform's broader form/workflow ecosystem (notifications, integrations)

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe unclear or interesting answers
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks for observing real search behavior
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

QuestionPro

Product Search and Purchase Survey Template

This template is a genuine comparable offering, framing search evaluation within the broader product search-and-purchase journey rather than isolating search UX specifically. It's a ready-to-field static survey backed by QuestionPro's established CX survey platform. It likely covers purchase intent alongside search, which is a different (broader) angle than a dedicated search-UX diagnostic.

잘하는 점

  • Connects search behavior to downstream purchase outcomes, useful for conversion-focused teams
  • Backed by a mature, established survey platform with broad question-type support
  • Likely includes standard filtering/rating question types typical of QuestionPro's library

아쉬운 점

  • Fixed-question static survey with no adaptive AI interview to follow up on ambiguous or negative feedback
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option to observe actual search sessions
  • No automated per-response quality scoring, and no published transparency into question logic or prompts

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.