모든 템플릿

Patient Portal Lab Results Comprehension Survey

Measures how patients interpret, understand, and respond to lab results and reference ranges in online portals. Identifies usability barriers and preferred features to improve portal design and health literacy support.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 21개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome! Thank you for taking part in this survey about viewing and understanding lab results in online patient portals. This survey is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest experience. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. The survey takes approximately 6–8 minutes. Please answer based on your experience in the last 12 months.

Q02
객관식

In the past 12 months, how often have you viewed lab results in an online patient portal?

  • Several times a month
  • About once a month
  • Every few months
  • Once in the last year
  • Not in the last 12 months
Q03
의견 척도

Overall, how confident are you in your ability to understand your lab results when you view them online?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q04
의견 척도

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statement: The reference ranges shown alongside my lab results were easy to understand.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q05
순위 매기기

Please rank the following features by how much they would help you understand your lab results. Drag the most helpful feature to the top.

  1. Plain-language explanation of what the result means
  2. Clear reference range with color highlighting
  3. Clinician's note or interpretation
  4. Visual trend chart showing results over time
  5. Suggested next steps (e.g., retest, contact clinician)
  6. Links to trusted educational resources
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q06
장문형

If you have had a confusing experience with a lab result in the last 12 months, please briefly describe what happened and what would have helped you understand the result better.

Q07
드롭다운

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
메시지

Thank you for participating! Your feedback will help improve how lab results are presented and explained in patient portals. You may now close this page.

Q09
객관식

In the past 12 months, where have you viewed lab results online? Select all that apply.

  • Hospital or health system portal
  • Primary care clinic portal
  • Lab company portal (e.g., a national lab)
  • Insurance portal
  • Emailed PDF or attachment
  • Other (please specify)
Q10
객관식

If your ALT (alanine aminotransferase) result is 45 U/L and the portal shows a reference range of 7–55 U/L, what does this most likely mean?

  • Your result is within the reference range
  • Your result is dangerously high
  • Your result is dangerously low
  • It depends; more clinical context is needed
  • Not sure
Q11
의견 척도

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statement: After viewing my lab results online, I understood what the results meant for my health.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q12
객관식

When you see an out-of-range lab result online, which of the following do you typically do? Select all that apply.

  • Send a message to my clinician
  • Schedule an appointment
  • Search online for information
  • Wait for a clinician note or call
  • Ignore it if only slightly out of range
  • I have not had an out-of-range result
  • Other (please specify)
Q13
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to learn more about your experience viewing lab results online. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions.

Q14
객관식

Which best describes your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
객관식

In the last 12 months, have measurement units (e.g., mg/dL vs. mmol/L) ever made a lab result harder to understand?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
  • Not applicable
Q16
의견 척도

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statement: After viewing my lab results online, I knew what steps to take next (e.g., contact my clinician, retest, no action needed).

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q17
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about viewing lab results in patient portals.

Q18
드롭다운

Which country do you currently live in?

  • United States
  • United Kingdom
  • Canada
  • Australia
  • Germany
  • France
  • India
  • Other (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
의견 척도

Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statement: The portal layout made it easy to find and review my lab results.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q20
객관식

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college or vocational training
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Graduate or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
의견 척도

Overall, how satisfied are you with how your lab results are presented in online patient portals?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an objective comprehension check (a specific ALT result vs. reference range scenario) that tests whether patients can actually interpret lab values, not just self-rate their confidence
  • Pairs multiple opinion-scale agreement statements and a satisfaction rating with a feature-ranking question, so design teams get both attitudinal data and prioritized feature preferences in one instrument
  • Includes an optional AI follow-up interview segment to probe patients' real experiences with confusing lab results beyond fixed-choice answers
  • Captures open-text detail on confusing past experiences and general feedback, giving qualitative context to the quantitative comprehension and satisfaction scores

Typeform

Patient health history questionnaire

This is a general patient intake questionnaire for collecting medical history, not a research survey on lab-result comprehension, portal usability, or health literacy. It's a fielding-ready static form built for a different purpose (clinical intake) than measuring how patients interpret reference ranges or portal design preferences. Worth noting for patient-facing form UX, but topically it's adjacent rather than comparable.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, patient-friendly conversational form UI typical of Typeform
  • Quick to deploy as a standard intake template
  • Backed by a mature survey/form platform with broad template library

아쉬운 점

  • Static question flow with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into confusing lab-result experiences
  • Not designed to test objective comprehension of specific lab values or reference ranges
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or published prompt-level methodology

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.