모든 템플릿

Fintech Subscription Pricing Sensitivity & Feature Priority Survey

Measures consumer price sensitivity using Van Westendorp methodology, feature prioritization, and billing preferences for fintech subscription plans. Designed for product and pricing teams evaluating consumer willingness to pay across global markets.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 22개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to this research survey on fintech subscription pricing. This survey takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are anonymous, will be reported in aggregate, and used for internal product research purposes only. Please proceed to begin.

Q02
객관식

Do you currently pay for any consumer fintech app or service (e.g., budgeting tools, investment platforms, credit monitoring)?

  • Yes, I currently pay for one or more
  • Not now, but I paid for one in the last 12 months
  • I have never paid for a fintech app
Q03
메시지

<p>Please carefully read the following plan description before answering the next set of questions.</p><p><strong>Proposed Fintech Subscription Plan</strong></p><p>A monthly paid plan for a consumer fintech app that includes:</p><p>Account aggregation (view all accounts in one place)</p><p>Budgeting insights and spending analysis</p><p>Bill tracking and payment reminders</p><p>Credit score monitoring</p><p>Fraud alerts and security notifications</p><p>Priority in-app support</p><p>Please keep this plan in mind as you answer the following questions.</p>

Q04
의견 척도

How likely are you to subscribe to a paid plan like this in the next 30 days?

척도: 15
최소:Very unlikely최대:Very likely
Q05
장문형

At what monthly price (in your local currency) would this plan be so inexpensive that you would question its quality? Please enter a number only.

Q06
순위 매기기

Please rank the following features from most important (1) to least important (6) for a paid fintech plan.

  1. Account aggregation
  2. Budgeting insights
  3. Bill tracking
  4. Credit score monitoring
  5. Fraud alerts
  6. Priority in-app support
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q07
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about your pricing expectations or must-have features for a paid fintech plan?

Q08
드롭다운

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will help us design better pricing and features for consumer fintech products. You may now close this window.

Q10
의견 척도

How would you rate the overall value of this plan based on the features described?

척도: 17
최소:Extremely poor value최대:Extremely good value
Q11
장문형

At what monthly price (in your local currency) would this plan feel like a bargain — great value for the money? Please enter a number only.

Q12
객관식

Which billing cadence do you prefer for a fintech subscription?

  • Monthly
  • Quarterly (every 3 months)
  • Semiannual (every 6 months)
  • Annual
Q13
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to understand your pricing perspective a bit more. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of brief follow-up questions about the prices and features you selected.

Q14
객관식

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
장문형

At what monthly price (in your local currency) would this plan start to feel expensive, but you would still consider it? Please enter a number only.

Q16
드롭다운

What is the minimum discount that would make you choose annual billing instead of monthly?

  • No discount needed — I prefer annual regardless
  • 5% – 10%
  • 11% – 15%
  • 16% – 20%
  • 21% – 30%
  • More than 30%
  • I would never choose annual billing
Q17
드롭다운

In which region do you currently live?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • South America
Q18
장문형

At what monthly price (in your local currency) would this plan be too expensive for you to consider at all? Please enter a number only.

Q19
객관식

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college, no degree
  • Associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Graduate or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
드롭다운

Which monthly price band (in USD) feels most reasonable for a Standard plan with the features described?

  • Under $5
  • $5 – $9
  • $10 – $14
  • $15 – $19
  • $20 – $29
  • $30 or more
Q21
객관식

Which best describes your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Homemaker/caregiver
  • Unemployed and looking
  • Not working by choice
  • Retired
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
드롭다운

Which range best describes your annual household income (before taxes) in USD?

  • Under $25,000
  • $25,000 – $49,999
  • $50,000 – $74,999
  • $75,000 – $99,999
  • $100,000 – $149,999
  • $150,000 or more
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Uses the full 4-question Van Westendorp price sensitivity battery (too cheap, bargain, expensive, too expensive) plus a direct price-band dropdown, rather than a single willingness-to-pay question.
  • Pairs quantitative pricing data with a feature-priority ranking exercise and billing-cadence/annual-discount questions, so pricing and packaging trade-offs are captured in one instrument.
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview after the survey portion to probe the reasoning behind each respondent's price thresholds and feature ranking, with transparent prompts researchers can review.
  • Collects standard segmentation data (age, gender, region, education, employment, income band) enabling cross-market and cross-segment willingness-to-pay analysis, with an auto-generated report at the end.

Jotform

Price Sensitivity Survey Form Template

A fielding-ready form focused on core price sensitivity questions, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's a general-purpose pricing template rather than one tailored to fintech subscriptions or feature-priority trade-offs. Useful as a quick-start form but lacks the fintech-specific plan framing and multi-dimensional structure of a dedicated pricing study.

잘하는 점

  • Easy to customize and embed via Jotform's widely-used form builder
  • Templatized starting point for basic Van Westendorp-style pricing questions
  • Likely supports standard form logic and export options

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into respondents' pricing rationale
  • No mention of automated response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
  • Not tailored to fintech subscription plans or feature-prioritization trade-offs

SurveyMonkey

Product Feature Survey Template

A general product feature prioritization template on SurveyMonkey's platform, useful for gauging feature importance but not built around pricing sensitivity or subscription billing decisions. It could be adapted for the feature-ranking portion of a fintech pricing study but doesn't address Van Westendorp pricing or plan-specific willingness to pay.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and panel infrastructure
  • Simple structure for ranking or rating feature importance
  • Easy to launch quickly for general feature feedback

아쉬운 점

  • No pricing sensitivity methodology (Van Westendorp or otherwise) included
  • Fixed-format questions only, with no adaptive AI interview to explore why a feature is prioritized
  • No fintech-specific plan/pricing framing or billing cadence questions

SurveySparrow

Price Sensitivity Questionnaire Template

A conversational-style pricing questionnaire template covering standard price sensitivity questions. It's a static template rather than a fintech-tailored pricing study, and doesn't combine pricing thresholds with feature prioritization or billing preference questions in one flow.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational chat-like UI that may feel more engaging than a plain form
  • Includes core price sensitivity question types
  • Templatized for quick deployment on SurveySparrow's platform

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI-moderated follow-up interview to probe reasoning behind stated price points
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or published prompt transparency
  • Not designed around fintech subscription plans, feature trade-offs, or annual-discount billing preferences

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.