모든 템플릿

Project Retrospective: Root Causes & Process Fixes

Captures what went well, what broke, and why on a just-completed project, then surfaces the process changes the team would realistically adopt. An AI follow-up reconstructs the actual sequence of events behind the biggest setback instead of settling for a vague 'communication issues' answer. Built for project leads and PMOs running structured retros.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 11개 · 약 6분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on this project. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your honest read on what worked, what didn't, and what should change helps us actually fix things next time. About 6-8 minutes.

Q02
의견 척도필수

Overall, how successful was this project relative to its original goals (scope, timeline, quality)?

척도: 17
최소:Complete failure최대:Complete success
Q03
매트릭스필수

Rate how each part of the project went.

7개 행 × 3개 열
  • Planning & scope definition
  • Stakeholder communication & alignment
  • Resourcing & staffing
  • Technical execution
  • Testing & quality assurance
  • 외 2개
: Went poorly · Went okay · Went well
Q04
객관식필수

Which of these contributed to the project's biggest setbacks? Select all that apply.

  • Unclear or shifting requirements
  • Scope creep
  • Insufficient staffing or skills
  • Poor communication across teams
  • Unrealistic timeline or estimates
  • Technical debt or legacy systems
  • Lack of stakeholder buy-in
  • Dependency delays from other teams
  • Unclear ownership or decision rights
Q05
장문형필수

In your own words, describe the single most significant failure or near-miss moment on this project — what happened, and when did the team first notice something was off?

Q06
순위 매기기필수

Rank these potential process changes from most to least valuable for this team to adopt on the next project. (Template note: replace with your own candidate process changes before launching, based on internal input.)

  1. Add a formal scope-freeze milestone before build starts
  2. Hold a weekly cross-team sync on dependencies
  3. Build explicit buffer time into estimates
  4. Run a lightweight retro after every sprint, not just at the end
  5. Clarify ownership with a RACI-style breakdown
  6. Increase automated test coverage before release
  7. Improve handoff documentation between teams
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q07
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct the actual sequence of events behind the single biggest setback the respondent described: what decision or signal came first, who noticed it, how long it took to escalate, and what was tried before it became a real problem. If they named a process change they ranked highest, probe what would concretely block their team from adopting it next time and what would need to be true for it to actually stick.

Q08
의견 척도필수

Realistically, without extra management pressure, how likely is your team to actually adopt the process change you ranked highest?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q09
객관식

Which best describes your role on this project?

  • Project or program lead
  • Individual contributor / builder
  • Product or business owner
  • Engineering or technical lead
  • QA or testing
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
객관식

How long were you involved with this project?

  • Less than 1 month
  • 1-3 months
  • 4-6 months
  • More than 6 months
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
메시지

That's everything — thank you for the candid feedback. Responses across the team will be compiled into a root-cause summary and a short list of process changes for leadership to review before the next project kicks off.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview block that reconstructs the actual sequence of events behind the biggest setback, instead of stopping at a surface-level 'communication issues' answer
  • Combines quantitative rating (rating-scale, matrix) with open-ended failure analysis (open-text) and a ranking exercise for prioritizing realistic process fixes
  • Asks a grounded feasibility question — how likely the team is to act on changes without extra management pressure — which static templates don't probe
  • Segments respondents by role and project tenure (multiple-choice) so PMOs can weight perspectives when reading the auto-generated report

SurveyMonkey

Project Retrospective Questions Template

A fielding-ready retrospective template covering standard post-project reflection questions. It's built on SurveyMonkey's established survey infrastructure with broad question-type support and easy distribution. However, it appears to be a fixed question set rather than one that adapts based on a respondent's answers.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-deploy template on a mature survey platform
  • Likely covers standard retrospective categories (what went well/poorly)
  • Easy to customize question wording within SurveyMonkey's editor

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into vague answers like 'communication issues'
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology

Jotform

Project Changes Report Form Template

This is a static form for logging project changes/reports rather than a purpose-built root-cause retrospective survey, so it's a partial and somewhat tangential comparison. It benefits from Jotform's flexible form-builder and integrations. It's not designed to surface why a setback happened, just to record what changed.

잘하는 점

  • Highly customizable drag-and-drop form fields
  • Good for structured documentation/reporting workflows
  • Integrates with Jotform's broader app ecosystem

아쉬운 점

  • Not designed as a reflective retrospective survey — closer to a change-log form
  • No adaptive AI questioning to reconstruct event sequences
  • No built-in scoring, AI interview, or auto-generated analysis report

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.