Undergraduate Student Experience & Satisfaction Survey
Measures how undergraduates rate advising, coursework, facilities, wellness support, and belonging, plus overall satisfaction and improvement priorities. Built for provosts, deans of students, and institutional research teams. The AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each student's satisfaction score, surfacing specific moments and unmet needs that ratings alone miss.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
What is your current class standing?
- Freshman / first-year
- Sophomore
- Junior
- Senior
- Fifth-year or beyond
- Other
How satisfied are you with each part of your undergraduate experience?
- Academic advising
- Course quality and rigor
- Campus facilities and resources
- Mental health and wellness services
- Career services and internship support
- 외 2개
Overall, how satisfied are you with your undergraduate experience so far?
In the past academic term, how often did you use academic support resources such as tutoring, office hours, or a writing/study center?
- Never
- Once or twice
- A few times a month
- Weekly or more
Which of these, if improved, would make the biggest difference to your undergraduate experience?
- More available academic advising appointments
- Expanded mental health and counseling services
- More career services and internship support
- Increased financial aid or affordability support
- Better campus housing options
- More diverse clubs and extracurricular activities
- Improved classroom technology and facilities
How strongly do you feel a sense of belonging to your campus community?
How would you rate the overall value of your undergraduate education relative to its cost?
Ask the respondent to explain the reasoning behind their overall satisfaction score, anchoring on a specific recent experience (a class, an advising interaction, a campus event) that shaped that number. If their belonging score was low, probe what makes them feel disconnected and from whom (peers, faculty, or the institution). If they picked a top improvement priority in the trade-off question, ask what a better version of that resource would look like in practice. For very high or very low overall satisfaction, dig into whether that view is recent or has been consistent since they arrived.
Which of the following have you personally experienced this academic year? (Select all that apply)
- Financial stress or affordability concerns
- Heavy academic workload or time management struggles
- Mental health or wellness challenges
- Feeling disconnected from peers or campus community
- Balancing work or family obligations with school
- Uncertainty about career path or major
- None of these
What is your age range? (Optional)
- 18 or younger
- 19-20
- 21-22
- 23-25
- 26 or older
- Prefer not to say
How do you describe your gender? (Optional)
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
Are you the first in your immediate family to attend a four-year college or university? (Optional)
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for sharing your experience! Your responses, along with everyone else's, go directly into a report the university uses to prioritize improvements to advising, wellness support, and campus life.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Goes beyond a satisfaction score with an AI follow-up interview that asks respondents to explain the reasoning behind their rating, surfacing specific moments and unmet needs ratings alone miss
- Covers the full institutional research picture in one flow: advising, coursework, facilities, wellness, and belonging via a satisfaction matrix, plus a dedicated belonging scale and a max-diff to prioritize what to improve
- Includes demographic and equity-relevant context (first-generation status, age range, gender, class standing) so provosts and deans can segment results without a separate survey
- Every response is automatically quality-scored and rolled into an auto-generated report, with transparent prompts showing exactly what the AI asked and why
QuestionPro
Undergraduate experience survey questions + sample questionnaire templateThis is a genuine undergraduate experience template with a sample question set covering academics, facilities, and satisfaction, aimed at the same institutional research audience. It reads as a static questionnaire rather than an interactive interview experience, and the page functions partly as a guide with sample questions alongside the template itself. No mention of AI-driven follow-up or per-response scoring.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built for the undergraduate experience use case with sample questions tailored to that population
- Backed by an established survey platform with broad question-type and distribution support
- Provides example questionnaire language that researchers can adapt quickly
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview — cannot probe why a student gave a particular satisfaction score
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated qualitative reports described on the page
- No transparent, published interview prompts — respondents get fixed questions only
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.