모든 템플릿

College Football Top 25 Poll Reasoning Survey

Captures how fans, media, or panel voters actually build a college football Top 25 ballot — which teams they'd rank where, which criteria drive those calls, and how confident they are in the official rankings. The AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind a voter's #1 pick and any team where their ballot diverges sharply from the published poll.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for sharing your college football rankings! This survey looks at how you'd build your own Top 25 ballot and what drives your calls. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

In a typical week during the season, how closely do you follow college football rankings and results?

  • I watch most games and track every ranking release
  • I watch some games and check rankings weekly
  • I mostly follow scores and rankings, few full games
  • I only check in around major matchups or the playoff picture
Q03
순위 매기기필수

Rank these teams from strongest to weakest as they'd appear on your personal Top 25 ballot this week. (Template note: replace with the current week's top contenders before launching.)

  1. (Replace with Team A)
  2. (Replace with Team B)
  3. (Replace with Team C)
  4. (Replace with Team D)
  5. (Replace with Team E)
  6. (Replace with Team F)
  7. (Replace with Team G)
  8. (Replace with Team H)
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q04
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

When you decide how to rank two closely matched teams, which of these factors matter most versus least to you?

  • Overall win-loss record
  • Quality of wins against ranked opponents
  • Avoiding losses to unranked or weaker teams
  • Game-by-game performance ('eye test')
  • Strength of schedule
  • Path to a conference championship
  • Preseason expectations or reputation
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most to my rankings최악:Matters least to my rankings
Q05
객관식필수

Which team do you think most deserves to be ranked #1 this week? (Template note: replace with the current top contenders.)

  • (Replace with Team A)
  • (Replace with Team B)
  • (Replace with Team C)
  • (Replace with Team D)
Q06
의견 척도필수

How confident are you that this week's official rankings reflect which teams are actually the strongest?

척도: 110
최소:Not confident at all최대:Extremely confident
Q07
객관식

In your view, which factor currently gets too much weight in how teams get ranked?

  • Overall win-loss record
  • Conference affiliation or brand reputation
  • Recent momentum or 'hot streaks'
  • Preseason rankings and expectations
  • Margin of victory / 'eye test' impressions
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Probe why the respondent ranked their #1 team above the others they placed just below it — anchor on a specific game, stat, or result they point to as proof. Then ask them to name one team in the official rankings whose position they'd move significantly (up or down) and walk through exactly what evidence changes their mind. If they say the rankings are basically fine as-is, ask what would have to happen in the next two weeks to shift their ballot.

Q09
장문형

Is there a team you think is clearly overrated or underrated right now? Tell us which one and why.

Q10
메시지

Just a few quick background questions to help us compare voting patterns across different types of fans and voters — all optional.

Q11
객관식

Which best describes your relationship to college football rankings?

  • Casual fan
  • Die-hard fan of one or two teams
  • Media member or sports writer
  • Official poll voter or committee member
  • Coach, player, or athletics staff
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

What is your age range?

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

What is your highest level of education completed?

  • High school or less
  • Some college
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Graduate or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

Thanks for building out your ballot with us! Your rankings and reasoning will be aggregated with other respondents to study how voters actually weigh evidence when ranking teams.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a full personal Top 25 ranking exercise plus a MaxDiff question that isolates which criteria actually drive close-call decisions between similar teams
  • Uses an AI follow-up interview to probe specifically why a respondent's #1 pick beat out the next-ranked teams, and to dig into any team where their ballot diverges sharply from the official poll
  • Captures self-reported voter type (fan, media, panel voter) and engagement level alongside confidence in the official rankings, so reasoning patterns can be segmented by respondent background
  • Closes with an open-ended question on overrated/underrated teams, giving qualitative color that a static form can't follow up on in real time

Jotform

Top 25 College Football Poll Form Template

A fielding-ready form template for collecting Top 25 poll submissions, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's oriented toward simple data collection (rankings, picks) rather than exploring the reasoning behind them. Customization is manual, with no built-in mechanism to ask why a respondent ranked things a certain way.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-use, fieldable form template
  • Easy drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform
  • Likely supports basic ranking/choice fields for poll submissions

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive follow-up interviewing to probe reasoning behind rankings
  • No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses
  • No transparent, publishable prompt methodology for how any AI-assisted elements work

Typeform

Top 25 College Football Poll Form Template

A conversational-style form template for gathering Top 25 poll picks, using Typeform's one-question-at-a-time flow. It's built for smooth data capture rather than deeper reasoning analysis, and any follow-up questions would need to be manually scripted with static logic branches. No mention of voice interviews or task-based, screen-share style probing.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational question flow typical of Typeform
  • Ready-to-deploy template for quick poll collection
  • Likely supports simple ranking and multiple-choice question types

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview that dynamically probes divergent rankings or #1 picks
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No option for voice-based AI interviews or guided screen-share tasks

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.