모든 템플릿

Project Management Software Usage & Satisfaction Survey

Measures how teams actually use their project management tool day to day — adoption, feature-level satisfaction, and the friction points that drive people back to spreadsheets — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a specific recent workflow moment instead of general sentiment. Built for product, IT, and operations teams evaluating or renewing tools.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share how the project management tool is working for your team. Your honest experience helps us decide what to fix, keep, or replace. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

Which project management tool does your team primarily use today? (Template note: replace the option list below with your organization's actual tool set before launching.)

  • (Replace with Tool A – e.g., Jira)
  • (Replace with Tool B – e.g., Asana)
  • (Replace with Tool C – e.g., monday.com)
  • Spreadsheets or manual tracking
  • Other
Q03
객관식필수

In the last 30 days, how often did you log in and update or check on your tasks in this tool?

  • Multiple times a day
  • About once a day
  • A few times a week
  • About once a week
  • Rarely or never
Q04
매트릭스

How would you rate this tool on each of the following?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Task tracking and assignment
  • Reporting and dashboards
  • Team collaboration features
  • Third-party integrations
  • Mobile app experience
: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q05
평점 척도필수

Overall, how satisfied are you with this tool for managing your team's work?

범위: 15
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q06
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this tool to another team leader facing a similar workload?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of the following improvements would matter most to your team right now?

  • Faster page load and performance
  • Better reporting and dashboards
  • Simpler task creation and editing
  • More integrations with other tools
  • Improved mobile experience
  • Better notifications and alerts
  • More flexible views (Kanban, Gantt, list)
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q08
객관식

What is the single biggest frustration you have with your current tool?

  • Too slow or clunky to use
  • Missing features we need
  • Too complicated for new team members
  • Poor integration with other tools we use
  • Reporting doesn't show what we need
  • No major frustration
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Probe the respondent's satisfaction and recommendation scores by reconstructing one specific recent instance where the tool helped or hindered their work — anchor on the frustration they selected and walk through what happened, what workaround they used, and how much time or effort it cost. If they rated the tool highly across the board, dig into which specific feature drives that loyalty and whether they've evaluated alternatives recently.

Q10
객관식

What is your primary role on your team?

  • Individual contributor
  • Team lead or manager
  • Project or program manager
  • Executive or director
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

How large is the team that uses this tool?

  • 1-5 people
  • 6-15 people
  • 16-50 people
  • 51-200 people
  • More than 200 people
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your responses will be combined with your team's to guide what we improve, integrate, or reconsider in our project management setup.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a matrix rating across specific tool features plus overall satisfaction and recommend-likelihood scores, so you get both breadth and a comparable NPS-style metric
  • Uses a max-diff exercise to force-rank which improvements actually matter most, avoiding the flat 'everything is important' bias of single-select feature lists
  • Pairs a biggest-frustration multiple-choice question with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a specific recent workflow moment tied to the respondent's own satisfaction and recommendation scores, instead of asking for general sentiment
  • Captures role and team size upfront so friction points and adoption patterns can be segmented by who's actually reporting them

QuestionPro

Project Management Software Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is largely a content page listing sample project management software survey questions rather than a ready-to-field interactive template. It's useful as a question-bank reference and QuestionPro's broader platform supports logic and reporting, but this specific page doesn't demonstrate an adaptive, fielded questionnaire.

잘하는 점

  • Provides a curated sample question set covering common PM software evaluation angles
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey platform with standard logic and analytics capabilities

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up — respondents can't be probed on a specific recent workflow moment
  • Presented as a static question list/guide rather than a fielding-ready survey with automated scoring
  • No published methodology or transparent prompt logic for how questions were derived

Jotform

Project Management Survey Form Template

A genuinely fielding-ready drag-and-drop form template that teams can deploy quickly and customize within Jotform's broader form ecosystem. It covers standard usage and satisfaction fields but relies on fixed question sets with no follow-up probing. Jotform's free tier makes it easy to try before committing to a paid plan.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-use, easily customizable form builder with drag-and-drop editing
  • Integrates with Jotform's wider suite (tables, workflows, notifications)
  • Free tier available for quick testing

아쉬운 점

  • Static form fields only — no adaptive AI follow-up to reconstruct a specific workflow moment
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report
  • No transparent methodology behind question selection or scoring

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.