Employee Recognition Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures how often employees are recognized, how fair and meaningful that recognition feels, and whether it comes more from managers or peers. An AI follow-up digs into a specific recent recognition moment to surface what actually made it land — or fall flat — beyond the survey ratings.

이 템플릿 사용하기 템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분

Q01

메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share how recognition feels on your team. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your honest answers help us make it fairer and more meaningful. About 6 minutes.

Q02

객관식필수

In the last 3 months, how often have you received recognition (formal or informal) for your work?

Never
Once
A few times (2-3)
Regularly (about monthly)
Frequently (weekly or more)

Q03

의견 척도필수

How fairly do you feel recognition is distributed across your team, regardless of role or tenure?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Not fair at all최대:Extremely fair

Q04

매트릭스필수

Thinking about recognition at our company, how much do you agree with each statement?

5개 행 × 5개 열

The recognition I receive feels genuine and specific to what I did
Recognition happens close in time to the achievement, not weeks later
People at all levels get recognized, not just top performers
Recognition reflects our stated company values
I trust the criteria used to decide who gets recognized

열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree

Q05

객관식필수

Who most often recognizes your contributions?

My direct manager
A peer or teammate
Someone outside my team
Senior leadership/executives
I don't recall being recognized

Q06

평점 척도

Think of the most recent time you were recognized. How meaningful did it feel to you personally?

범위: 1 – 5

최소:Not meaningful at all최대:Extremely meaningful

Q07

점수 배분필수

Ideally, how should recognition for your work be distributed across these sources? Allocate 100 points total across all that apply.

Direct manager
Peers/teammates
Senior leadership
Cross-functional colleagues
Customers/clients

100점 배분

Q08

최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these changes would make our recognition program most meaningful to you?

More frequent recognition
More specific, detailed recognition messages
Tangible rewards (gift cards, bonuses) tied to recognition
Public visibility (team channel, all-hands shoutouts)
Better peer-to-peer recognition tools
Recognition tied more clearly to company values
Manager training on how to recognize effectively

세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most impactful최악:Least impactful

Q09

AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's fairness rating: ask for a specific, recent example of recognition that felt fair or unfair, who gave it, and why. If they distinguished manager vs. peer recognition, explore which felt more genuine and what made it so. If they said no one recognizes their work, dig into what contribution should have been recognized and what got in the way.

Q10

의견 척도필수

How likely are you to tell a colleague that our recognition program makes people feel valued?

척도: 0 – 10

최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely

Q11

객관식

Which department are you part of?

Engineering/Product
Sales
Marketing
Customer Support/Success
Operations
Finance/HR/Admin
Prefer not to say

Q12

객관식

How long have you been with the company?

Less than 6 months
6 months to 1 year
1-3 years
3-5 years
5+ years
Prefer not to say

Q13

객관식

Which best describes your role?

Individual contributor
People manager
Senior leader/executive
Prefer not to say

Q14

메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your answers will be combined with others to identify where recognition feels fair and meaningful, and where the program needs work.

포함된 기능

AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

Includes an AI follow-up interview follow-up that probes the reasoning behind each respondent's fairness rating, asking for a specific recent example instead of stopping at a number
Uses a point-allocation question to capture how employees think recognition *should* be split across manager/peer/company sources, not just how it currently is
Combines a best-worst trade-off prioritization question with matrix and rating-scale items to triangulate what respondents value most, not just how they feel overall
Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean open-ended recognition stories get synthesized, not just tallied

SurveyMonkey

Employee Recognition Survey Template & Questions

A ready-to-field static template covering recognition frequency and satisfaction, backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey infrastructure and benchmarking. It relies on fixed question sets and closed-ended scales, so any 'why' behind a low fairness or meaningfulness score has to be inferred rather than asked directly. Good for quick deployment, less suited to uncovering the specific moment that made recognition land or fall flat.

잘하는 점

Fielding-ready template with established survey distribution and reporting tools
Likely benefits from SurveyMonkey's broader question bank and benchmarking data
Simple setup for teams that just want standard recognition metrics

아쉬운 점

Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to probe individual responses further
No mechanism to surface a specific recognition anecdote behind a rating
No published methodology on how questions were validated or scored

Typeform

Employee Recognition Survey Template

A conversational-style static template that likely covers recognition frequency, sources, and sentiment in Typeform's signature one-question-at-a-time format. It's fielding-ready and pleasant to take, but like other static builders it cannot ask a dynamic follow-up when a respondent gives an interesting or concerning answer. Reporting is templated rather than synthesized from open-ended detail.

잘하는 점

Fielding-ready template with a polished, high-completion-rate interface
Conversational one-question format tends to feel less like a formal survey
Easy to customize branding and question wording within Typeform's builder

아쉬운 점

No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into a specific recognition moment behind a score
No voice interview option or guided task/screen-share capability
No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template 무료로 시작하기

샘플 질문

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share how recognition feels on your team. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your honest answers help us make it fairer and more meaningful. About 6 minutes.

In the last 3 months, how often have you received recognition (formal or informal) for your work?

How fairly do you feel recognition is distributed across your team, regardless of role or tenure?

Thinking about recognition at our company, how much do you agree with each statement?

Who most often recognizes your contributions?

Think of the most recent time you were recognized. How meaningful did it feel to you personally?

Ideally, how should recognition for your work be distributed across these sources? Allocate 100 points total across all that apply.

Which of these changes would make our recognition program most meaningful to you?

How likely are you to tell a colleague that our recognition program makes people feel valued?

Which department are you part of?

How long have you been with the company?

Which best describes your role?

That's everything — thank you! Your answers will be combined with others to identify where recognition feels fair and meaningful, and where the program needs work.

포함된 기능

AI 후속 질문

주의력 확인 장치

AI가 작성한 문안

자동 리포트

다른 서비스와 비교

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

잘하는 점

아쉬운 점

잘하는 점

아쉬운 점

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?