QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Professional Development Needs & Learning Preferences Survey

Measures where employees feel skill gaps, which learning formats and time investments actually work for them, and how their career goals should shape the L&D roadmap. Built for HR and L&D teams planning training budgets and programs. An AI follow-up digs into the specific skill gap and career goal each person names to surface concrete blockers, not just checkbox preferences.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes on this! We're building out next year's learning and development offerings and want to design them around what you actually need. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5-6 minutes, and your honest answers make a real difference.

Q02
객관식필수

Which of the following skill areas feel weakest for you right now?

  • Technical/functional skills for my role
  • Leadership & people management
  • Communication & collaboration
  • Data & analytical skills
  • Strategic thinking & business acumen
  • Digital tools & AI proficiency
  • Project management & prioritization
Q03
슬라이더 매트릭스필수

How confident do you feel in each of these areas today?

6개 행, 각 행마다 슬라이더 1개
  • Technical/functional skills
  • Leadership & people management
  • Communication & collaboration
  • Data & analytical skills
  • Strategic thinking
  • 외 1개
슬라이더 0–10최소:Not confident at all최대:Extremely confident
Q04
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

If your company could only fund a few learning priorities next year, which would matter most to you?

  • Leadership & management training
  • Technical/functional certifications
  • Communication & presentation skills
  • Data literacy & analytics tools
  • AI and emerging technology skills
  • Project & time management
  • Cross-functional/business knowledge
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most important to me최악:Least important to me
Q05
객관식필수

Which learning formats actually work best for you?

  • Instructor-led workshops or classes
  • Self-paced online courses
  • 1:1 mentoring or coaching
  • On-the-job stretch assignments
  • Peer learning groups or communities
  • Conferences or external events
  • Reading, research, or self-study
Q06
객관식필수

In a typical month, how many hours can you realistically dedicate to professional development?

  • None right now
  • Less than 2 hours
  • 2-5 hours
  • 5-10 hours
  • 10+ hours
Q07
의견 척도필수

How much does your manager actively support your professional development (e.g., time, budget, encouragement)?

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Not supportive at all최대:Extremely supportive
Q08
객관식필수

Which best describes your primary career goal for the next 12-24 months?

  • Advance to the next level in my current track
  • Move into people management
  • Pivot to a different function or team
  • Build deeper expertise in my current role
  • Not sure yet
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Explore the respondent's self-identified weakest skill area and their stated career goal in detail: ask for a specific recent moment where that skill gap held them back, and probe what's actually stopping them from closing it (time, access, manager support, unclear path). If they said their career goal is 'not sure yet', explore what options they're weighing and what information would help them decide. Anchor follow-ups on their own answers rather than generic prompts.

Q10
장문형

What's the single biggest thing holding you back from doing more professional development right now?

Q11
객관식

Which best describes your current role level? (For planning purposes only — never linked to your individual responses.)

  • Individual contributor
  • Team lead / supervisor
  • Manager
  • Senior/director level
  • Executive
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How long have you been with the company?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 3-5 years
  • 5-10 years
  • 10+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your answers will shape which training programs, formats, and time investments we prioritize this year.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview block that explores each respondent's self-identified weakest skill area and their stated career goal together, surfacing concrete blockers instead of stopping at checkbox answers
  • Combines quantitative prioritization (best-worst trade-off for budget-limited learning priorities, slider grid for confidence-by-area) with open-ended probing (open-text on what's holding people back) in one flow
  • Ties skill gaps and format preferences directly to planning variables L&D teams need: realistic monthly time investment, manager support level, role level, and tenure
  • Ends with a transparent conversational message explaining exactly how answers will shape training programs, setting clear expectations for respondents

Jotform

Professional Development Needs Assessment Form Template

A static, fielding-ready form for gathering professional development needs, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It covers standard needs-assessment fields but has no mechanism to adapt questions based on an individual's answers. Good for quick deployment, not for deeper qualitative follow-up.

잘하는 점

  • Fielding-ready and easy to deploy quickly
  • Customizable via Jotform's widely-used form builder
  • Likely integrates with Jotform's broader form/workflow ecosystem

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up — every respondent sees the same fixed question set regardless of their answers
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No voice AI interview option for richer qualitative input

SurveyMonkey

Professional Development Survey Template (14+ Questions)

A ready-to-use, multi-question static survey template from a well-established survey platform. It's built for broad distribution and benefits from SurveyMonkey's analytics and benchmarking tools, but the question set is fixed and doesn't probe further into an individual's specific skill gap or career goal.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's mature analytics and reporting suite
  • Fielding-ready with a substantial (14+) question bank
  • Broad brand trust for large-scale employee distribution

아쉬운 점

  • Static question flow — no AI-driven follow-up to dig into individual skill gaps or career goals
  • No guided task or screen-share capability for deeper diagnostics
  • No transparent prompt methodology since there's no AI layer to begin with

Typeform

Professional Development Feedback Survey Template

A conversational-style, fielding-ready template leveraging Typeform's one-question-at-a-time UX for a smoother respondent experience. It's focused on feedback collection rather than a full needs assessment tied to career goals, and like other form builders it lacks any adaptive follow-up intelligence.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational UI that tends to improve completion rates
  • Fielding-ready out of the box
  • Easy embedding and branding via Typeform's platform

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to explore the reasoning behind a stated skill gap or career goal
  • No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses
  • No auto-generated analytical report — results still require manual interpretation

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기