모든 템플릿

Time Off Request Process Experience Survey

Measures how easy, fair, and transparent employees find the process of requesting vacation, personal, or sick time — from submission method to manager responsiveness and decision speed. Built for HR and people-ops teams auditing their leave policy, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs exactly what happened on a recent request instead of relying on vague satisfaction ratings.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your experience with our time off request process. Your honest feedback helps us make it faster and fairer for everyone. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 4-5 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

In the last 6 months, how many times have you requested time off (vacation, personal, or sick leave)?

  • None
  • Once
  • 2-3 times
  • 4-5 times
  • More than 5 times
Q03
객관식필수

Thinking about your most recent time off request, how was it handled?

  • Approved as requested
  • Approved with changes to dates or duration
  • Denied
  • Still pending or never got a response
  • I haven't submitted a request yet
Q04
객관식

Which method did you use to submit your most recent time off request?

  • HR or time-off tracking system/app
  • Email
  • Verbal conversation with manager
  • Paper form
  • Other
Q05
의견 척도필수

How easy was it to submit your most recent time off request?

척도: 15
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q06
의견 척도필수

How satisfied were you with how quickly your request was addressed?

척도: 15
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q07
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about your organization's time off process?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • The process for requesting time off is clearly explained
  • I receive enough advance notice of the decision
  • My manager is supportive when I request time off
  • The approval process feels fair across my team
  • I understand how coverage needs or blackout dates affect my request
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q08
평점 척도필수

How would you rate your manager's communication throughout the request process?

범위: 15
최소:Poor최대:Excellent
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct exactly what happened with the respondent's most recent time off request: when they submitted it, how long they waited, who they heard back from, and what the outcome was. If it was denied, delayed, or modified, probe what reason (if any) was given and how that made them feel about asking again. If it was smooth, ask what specifically made it easy so we can replicate it elsewhere.

Q10
장문형

What would make the time off request process easier or fairer for you?

Q11
객관식

Which best describes your role type?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Contract or temporary
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How long have you been with the organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 2 years
  • 2 to 5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you for your honest feedback! Your responses will be reviewed by HR to identify where the time off process needs to be clearer, faster, or fairer.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a submission form to measure the full experience — ease of submission, manager responsiveness, decision speed, and fairness — using scaled and matrix questions rather than just collecting a request.
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs exactly what happened on the respondent's most recent time off request instead of relying on a single vague satisfaction score.
  • Captures context like submission method, role type, and tenure so HR and people-ops teams can segment findings and audit policy gaps by employee group.
  • Ends with an open-ended question on what would make the process easier or fairer, giving qualitative detail the AI interview can probe further in real time.

Jotform

60+ Time Off Request Forms

This is a template gallery/category page offering many time-off request form variants, not a single ready-to-field survey. It's built for collecting leave requests themselves (dates, reason, approval routing) rather than measuring employee experience with the process.

잘하는 점

  • Large selection of customizable form layouts for different leave types
  • Likely supports drag-and-drop form building and integrations typical of Jotform

아쉬운 점

  • Functions as a static intake form for submitting requests, not a survey measuring perceived fairness or transparency of the process
  • No adaptive AI follow-up to reconstruct what actually happened on a specific request
  • No built-in quality scoring or automated experience report generation

SurveyMonkey

Time Off Request Form Template

A single ready-to-use template focused on collecting time off requests, likely with standard fields like dates and reason for leave. It's built for form-style data collection rather than in-depth qualitative evaluation of the request experience.

잘하는 점

  • Fielding-ready template with SurveyMonkey's established distribution and reporting tools
  • Simple, familiar form format for employees to submit requests

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to probe individual respondent experiences
  • No mechanism to reconstruct the sequence of events on a specific recent request
  • No transparent, published methodology for how responses are scored or summarized

Typeform

Employee Time Off Request Form Template

A conversational-style form for submitting time off requests, using Typeform's one-question-at-a-time format. It's designed as an intake tool rather than a diagnostic survey on process fairness or manager responsiveness.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational UI likely to feel less like a stiff HR form
  • Easy to customize question wording and branding

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interviewing — questions are fixed regardless of respondent answers
  • Not designed to measure decision speed, transparency, or fairness perceptions specifically
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or generated summary report on process health

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.