모든 템플릿

Sales Tool Stack Effectiveness Survey

Measures how reps actually experience your sales tech stack — CRM friction, tool overlap, hours lost to admin, and which tools they'd cut or keep — for sales ops leaders auditing their stack. An AI follow-up reconstructs the specific moment a tool slowed a rep down, instead of collecting generic complaints.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Hi! We're reviewing our sales tool stack and want your honest take — what actually helps you sell, what gets in the way, and what you'd cut. Takes about 5-6 minutes and your answers stay confidential.

Q02
객관식필수

Which of these tools do you use at least once a week to do your job? (Template note: replace the example tools below with your actual sales stack before launching.)

  • CRM (e.g., Salesforce, HubSpot)
  • Sales engagement / cadence tool (e.g., Outreach, Salesloft)
  • Conversation intelligence / call recording tool (e.g., Gong, Chorus)
  • Prospecting or data enrichment tool (e.g., ZoomInfo, Apollo)
  • Proposal or quoting tool (e.g., PandaDoc, DocuSign)
  • Internal reporting dashboard or spreadsheet
Q03
숫자필수

In the last 7 working days, roughly how many hours did you spend on non-selling admin tasks — logging activity, updating CRM fields, chasing data between tools, building reports?

Q04
의견 척도필수

How much friction does entering and maintaining data in the CRM add to your day-to-day selling?

척도: 15
최소:No friction — it's seamless최대:Constant friction — it slows me down daily
Q05
매트릭스필수

Rate each tool below on the following. (Template note: swap in the actual tools from your stack.)

4개 행 × 3개 열
  • CRM (e.g., Salesforce)
  • Sales engagement tool (e.g., Outreach)
  • Conversation intelligence tool (e.g., Gong)
  • Prospecting tool (e.g., ZoomInfo)
: Easy to use · Saves me time · I'd keep this if we had to cut tools
Q06
객관식

Which tools in your stack do the same job as another one, forcing you to double-enter data or check two sources for the same thing? (Template note: replace with your own tool list.)

  • CRM (e.g., Salesforce)
  • Sales engagement tool (e.g., Outreach)
  • Conversation intelligence tool (e.g., Gong)
  • Prospecting tool (e.g., ZoomInfo)
  • Proposal/quoting tool (e.g., PandaDoc)
  • Internal reporting dashboard
Q07
점수 배분필수

Think about a typical 40-hour work week. Allocate 100 points across how you actually spend your time.

  • Active selling (calls, meetings, demos)
  • CRM data entry and admin
  • Switching between tools or manual copy-paste
  • Internal reporting and forecasting
  • Prospecting research, training, other
100점 배분
Q08
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

If your team had to cut half of your sales tools next quarter, which would you fight to keep and which would you cut first? (Template note: replace with your own 6-9 tools.)

  • CRM (e.g., Salesforce)
  • Sales engagement tool (e.g., Outreach)
  • Conversation intelligence tool (e.g., Gong)
  • Prospecting/data tool (e.g., ZoomInfo)
  • Proposal/quoting tool (e.g., PandaDoc)
  • Internal reporting dashboard
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Keep no matter what최악:Cut first
Q09
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend your current sales tool stack, as-is, to a new rep joining the team?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q10
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct the last time a sales tool actually slowed the respondent down mid-deal or mid-week: which tool, what they were trying to do, and what workaround they used. Anchor on whichever tool they rated highest-friction or marked 'cut first' in the max-diff, and ask what would need to change for them to trust it again. If they say nothing is really broken, probe how much time double-entry or tool-switching costs them in a typical week.

Q11
단문형

What's one tool or feature you wish existed in your stack that would save you the most time?

Q12
객관식

Which best describes your role?

  • Account Executive
  • SDR / BDR
  • Sales Manager
  • Sales Operations
  • Customer Success / Account Management
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

How long have you been in your current sales role?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 2 years
  • 2-5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

Thank you — this is genuinely useful. Your answers will feed directly into our sales ops team's review of what to consolidate, fix, or drop from the stack.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview block that reconstructs the exact moment a specific tool slowed a rep down mid-deal, rather than settling for generic dissatisfaction ratings
  • Pairs quantitative stack-effectiveness metrics (point-allocation time allocation, best-worst trade-off cut-priority, matrix tool ratings, rating-scale friction/NPS-style loyalty) with qualitative depth in one flow
  • Directly surfaces tool overlap and redundant spend via a targeted multiple-choice question on duplicate-function tools
  • Closes with role and tenure segmentation so sales ops leaders can slice friction and cut/keep signals by rep type and experience level

SurveyMonkey

Sales Enablement Survey Template

This is a fielding-ready static template aimed at gauging how well sales teams are supported by content, training, and tools, making it the closest genuine comparator to a sales tool stack survey. It's built on SurveyMonkey's established survey infrastructure with standard question types and reporting. It leans more toward general enablement (training, content, messaging) than a focused audit of CRM friction and tool-by-tool cut/keep decisions.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's mature survey platform with broad question-type support and established distribution tools
  • Likely includes benchmark-style reporting and dashboard analytics typical of SurveyMonkey templates
  • Covers the broader sales enablement category (training, content, messaging), which can be useful context alongside tool-specific feedback

아쉬운 점

  • A static template with fixed questions; it cannot adaptively probe a rep to reconstruct a specific incident where a tool caused friction
  • No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology is published for this template
  • Not evidently structured around tool-by-tool overlap, forced-cut prioritization, or CRM-specific friction the way a dedicated tool-stack audit requires

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.