Team Meeting Scheduling Availability Poll

Finds the best date, time, and format for an upcoming meeting or event by checking real availability against a shortlist of options — for anyone coordinating a group across busy calendars. The AI follow-up digs into the scheduling conflicts and recurring constraints that a simple poll misses, so organizers don't pick a slot that quietly excludes key people.

이 템플릿 사용하기 템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분

Q01

메시지

Hi! We're trying to lock in a time that works for everyone. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Please tell us how the proposed options fit your schedule — takes about 7 minutes.

Q02

매트릭스필수

How well does each proposed date and time work for you? (Template note: replace these rows with your actual candidate dates/times before sending.)

3개 행 × 3개 열

(Replace with Option A: e.g., Tue Oct 14, 10:00 AM)
(Replace with Option B: e.g., Wed Oct 15, 2:00 PM)
(Replace with Option C: e.g., Thu Oct 16, 9:00 AM)

열: Works great · Could work · Doesn't work

Q03

순위 매기기필수

Of the options above, rank your top choices from most to least preferred.

(Replace with Option A)
(Replace with Option B)
(Replace with Option C)

드래그하여 순위 지정

Q04

드롭다운필수

What time zone should we use when scheduling you?

Pacific (PT)
Mountain (MT)
Central (CT)
Eastern (ET)
UK / GMT
Central Europe (CET)
India (IST)
China / Singapore (CST/SGT)
Japan / Korea (JST/KST)
Other

Q05

객관식

What meeting format works best for you?

In person
Virtual
Hybrid (some in person, some virtual)
No strong preference

Q06

객관식

Which days of the week generally work best for you, aside from the specific dates above?

Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Sunday

Q07

의견 척도필수

How flexible is your schedule during this window if none of the proposed options end up working?

척도: 1 – 5

최소:Not flexible at all최대:Extremely flexible

Q08

의견 척도

How important is it to you personally that this meeting happens?

척도: 1 – 5

최소:Not important at all최대:Extremely important

Q09

단문형

Any recurring conflicts or constraints we should know about (e.g., standing meetings, school pickup, travel)?

Q10

AI 인터뷰

Probe the respondent's real availability behind their ratings: for any date/time they marked 'Could work' or 'Doesn't work,' find out exactly what the conflict is and whether it's fixed or movable. If they flagged low flexibility, dig into what specifically would need to change for them to attend, and whether there's a fallback slot they haven't mentioned. If they marked everything as working perfectly, sanity-check by asking about recurring commitments they might have overlooked.

Q11

객관식

Which team or department are you scheduling on behalf of? (Template note: replace with your actual team list.)

(Replace with Team/Department A)
(Replace with Team/Department B)
(Replace with Team/Department C)
Prefer not to say

Q12

메시지

Thanks for sharing your availability! We'll use everyone's responses to lock in the final date and send a calendar invite shortly.

포함된 기능

AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

Includes an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific reasons behind low-availability ratings and uncovers recurring scheduling conflicts a static poll would miss
Combines a matrix rating of each proposed date/time with a ranked preference question, so organizers get both granularity and a clear tiebreaker
Captures time zone, meeting format, and general day-of-week preferences alongside the specific date options, reducing the risk of picking a slot that quietly excludes key people
Uses opening and closing chat messages plus opinion-scale questions on flexibility and meeting importance to add context AI templates can't gather

Jotform

Scheduling Poll Form Template

A ready-to-field static form for collecting availability from a group, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It covers the basics of gathering date/time preferences but doesn't probe deeper into why a respondent marked a slot as unavailable. Good for simple polls, less suited to uncovering hidden scheduling conflicts.

잘하는 점

Fielding-ready template within a widely used form builder
Likely supports easy customization of date/time fields and branding
Part of a broad template library with integrations (payments, notifications, etc.)

아쉬운 점

Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to explore conflicts behind low-availability answers
No automated quality scoring of responses
No transparent, published methodology for how the form logic was designed

SurveyMonkey

Online Scheduling Poll Template

A standard survey template for polling group availability, backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey infrastructure and reporting. It's a fielding-ready poll but relies on fixed multiple-choice/matrix-style questions rather than any conversational probing. Reporting is likely solid for aggregate results but not tailored to individual respondent nuance.

잘하는 점

Established survey platform with reliable distribution and reporting tools
Likely offers clean aggregate visualizations of availability across respondents
Simple, familiar poll format for quick group scheduling

아쉬운 점

No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into recurring constraints or conflicts
No voice interview or guided task option for richer context
No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

Typeform

Scheduling Poll Form Template

A conversational-style, fielding-ready form for collecting meeting availability, leveraging Typeform's one-question-at-a-time UX. It's more engaging to fill out than a plain grid but the question flow is still fixed rather than adaptive to individual answers. Useful for simple scheduling polls without deeper conflict discovery.

잘하는 점

Polished, conversational UI that likely improves completion rates
Fielding-ready template requiring minimal setup
Supports logic jumps for basic branching between questions

아쉬운 점

No true adaptive AI interviewing that follows up based on specific availability answers
No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
No automated per-response quality scoring or published prompt transparency

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template 무료로 시작하기

샘플 질문

Hi! We're trying to lock in a time that works for everyone. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Please tell us how the proposed options fit your schedule — takes about 7 minutes.

How well does each proposed date and time work for you? (Template note: replace these rows with your actual candidate dates/times before sending.)

Of the options above, rank your top choices from most to least preferred.

What time zone should we use when scheduling you?

What meeting format works best for you?

Which days of the week generally work best for you, aside from the specific dates above?

How flexible is your schedule during this window if none of the proposed options end up working?

How important is it to you personally that this meeting happens?

Any recurring conflicts or constraints we should know about (e.g., standing meetings, school pickup, travel)?

Which team or department are you scheduling on behalf of? (Template note: replace with your actual team list.)

Thanks for sharing your availability! We'll use everyone's responses to lock in the final date and send a calendar invite shortly.

포함된 기능

AI 후속 질문

주의력 확인 장치

AI가 작성한 문안

자동 리포트

다른 서비스와 비교

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

잘하는 점

아쉬운 점

잘하는 점

아쉬운 점

잘하는 점

아쉬운 점

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?