Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
Magazine Reader Engagement & Content Satisfaction Survey
Measures how readers actually consume a magazine — print or digital — how satisfied they are with specific sections, and which content types they'd trade off against each other. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind each reader's satisfaction or recommendation score, surfacing the specific articles, sections, or frustrations that closed questions miss.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q02
객관식필수
How do you typically read this magazine?
- Print copy
- Digital edition or app
- Website articles
- Both print and digital
Q03
객관식필수
Out of the last 3 issues, how many did you read all or most of?
- None
- One
- Two
- All three
Q04
매트릭스필수
How would you rate your satisfaction with each of these parts of the magazine?
5개 행 × 5개 열
- Feature articles
- Columns and opinion pieces
- Photography and visual design
- Cover design
- Balance of advertising to editorial content
열: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수
Which of these content types matter most to you when deciding whether to pick up or open an issue?
- Investigative or long-form features
- Celebrity or personality profiles
- How-to or practical guides
- Opinion and commentary
- Photography or visual essays
- Industry news and trends
- Reader letters or community content
- Product or service reviews
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most to me최악:Matters least to me
Q06
평점 척도필수
Overall, how satisfied are you with this magazine right now?
범위: 1 – 5
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q07
의견 척도필수
How likely are you to recommend this magazine to a friend or colleague?
척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q08
AI 인터뷰
Reconstruct the specific reasoning behind the respondent's recommendation and satisfaction scores. Anchor on the actual issue, article, or section they're thinking of. If the score was low, probe what would need to change for them to recommend it; if high, probe what specifically made them an advocate. If they mentioned a content type as least valuable in the trade-off question, ask why it still runs in the magazine from their perspective.
Q09
객관식
Going forward, which format would you prefer to read this magazine in?
- Print only
- Digital only
- Both print and digital
- No preference
Q10
객관식필수
How do you currently access this magazine?
- Paid subscriber
- Newsstand or single-copy buyer
- Free or complimentary reader
- Digital-only access
Q11
객관식
Which age range do you fall into?
- Under 18
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식
Which gender do you identify as?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지
That's everything — thank you for sharing your honest feedback! Your answers will feed directly into editorial planning for upcoming issues.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific reasoning behind each reader's satisfaction and recommendation scores, not just a static open-text box
- Combines quantitative measures (satisfaction matrix, MaxDiff content trade-offs, recommendation scale) with qualitative depth in one flow
- Captures format and access habits (print vs. digital, how often issues are read) alongside content satisfaction for a fuller consumption picture
- Auto-generates a report from responses, saving manual analysis of open-ended feedback
Jotform
Magazine Reader Survey Form TemplateA ready-to-use, customizable form template built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's designed for quick deployment and easy branding/embedding but relies on standard closed-ended questions. No mention of adaptive follow-up questioning or automated response scoring.
잘하는 점
- Fielding-ready template with drag-and-drop customization
- Backed by Jotform's broad form-building ecosystem and integrations
- Easy to embed or share via link
아쉬운 점
- Static question set with no adaptive AI probing into individual answers
- No published methodology or prompt transparency for how questions were designed
- No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses
Typeform
Magazine Reader Survey TemplateA polished, conversational-style survey template known for Typeform's signature one-question-at-a-time UX. It's fielding-ready and visually engaging, but the conversational feel is templated logic, not true AI-driven follow-up interviewing. No voice interview or guided task options are indicated.
잘하는 점
- Clean, one-question-at-a-time interface that boosts completion rates
- Fielding-ready with strong design customization
- Good brand recognition for engaging survey experiences
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview — logic branches are pre-set, not generated from each response
- No voice AI interview or screen-share task capability
- No transparent prompt or automated scoring methodology published
SurveySparrow
Reader Satisfaction Survey TemplateA conversational, chat-style survey template aimed at reader satisfaction measurement, fielding-ready out of the box. It emphasizes a friendly conversational tone similar to a chat interface, but questioning still follows fixed paths rather than true adaptive interviewing. No automated per-response quality scoring is indicated.
잘하는 점
- Fielding-ready template with a conversational chat-style format
- Marketing-focused template positioning for reader/audience feedback
- Easy to customize within SurveySparrow's platform
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interview that digs deeper based on individual answers
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
- No automated report generation or per-response quality scoring described
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.