LMS Integration & SSO Reliability Assessment for Educators
Measures teacher-reported reliability, error frequency, and satisfaction with LMS integrations and single sign-on (SSO) systems. Use this instrument to identify failure points, prioritize fixes, and benchmark integration performance over 30-day recall windows.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Which learning management system (LMS) do you primarily use this term?
- Google Classroom
- Canvas
- Schoology
- Blackboard Learn
- Moodle
- D2L Brightspace
- Microsoft Teams for Education
- Sakai
- Other
- None / I don't use an LMS
Overall, how would you rate the reliability and performance of your LMS integrations?
Which single sign-on (SSO) or identity provider do you primarily use to log in to your LMS?
- Google Workspace / Google SSO
- Microsoft 365 / Azure AD
- Clever
- ClassLink
- Okta
- OneLogin
- Apple School Manager
- Other
- I don't know / No SSO
When SSO or an integration fails, what do you typically do first? Select up to three.
- Retry the action
- Switch browser or device
- Use direct password login
- Clear cache/cookies
- Contact IT/help desk
- Wait and try later
- Give up / skip the tool entirely
- Other (please specify)
How likely are you to recommend your current LMS integrations and SSO setup to a colleague?
Which grade level(s) do you primarily teach?
- Elementary (K–5)
- Middle (6–8)
- High (9–12)
- Postsecondary
- Other / Multiple
Thank you for completing this survey! Your feedback will directly help improve LMS integration and SSO reliability for educators. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. If you have any questions about this research, please contact the survey administrator.
How long have you been using your current LMS?
- Less than 3 months
- 3–12 months
- 1–3 years
- More than 3 years
In the last 30 days, which of the following issues did you encounter with LMS integrations? Select all that apply.
- Tool failed to launch
- Timeout or spinning loader
- Data did not sync to gradebook
- Duplicate or missing rosters
- Wrong permissions or role
- Unexpected logout
- Error message without guidance
- Other (please specify)
- None of the above
In the last 30 days, how often did your SSO login work successfully on the first attempt?
If one area of your LMS integration or SSO experience could be improved first, which would you choose?
- Faster login
- Fewer launch failures
- More reliable grade sync
- Timely and accurate rostering
- Clearer error messages
- Better vendor support
Please briefly describe a recent LMS integration or SSO issue you experienced in the last 30 days. What happened, and how did you resolve it (if at all)?
Which subject area(s) do you primarily teach? Select up to three.
- English / Language Arts
- Mathematics
- Science
- Social Studies / History
- World Languages
- Arts
- PE / Health
- CTE / STEM
- Special Education
- Other
In a typical week, approximately how many LMS-integrated tools do you use?
- 0 (none)
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- More than 10
In the last 30 days, how often did your LMS-integrated tools display errors or fail to load?
When your SSO login succeeds, approximately how long does it take to reach your LMS dashboard?
- Under 5 seconds
- 5–15 seconds
- 15–30 seconds
- 30–60 seconds
- More than 60 seconds
- I'm not sure
Based on your survey responses, we'd like to explore your LMS integration and SSO experiences in a bit more detail. An AI moderator will ask a few brief follow-up questions.
How many years have you been teaching?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–3 years
- 4–7 years
- 8–15 years
- 16+ years
Which of the following integration types do you regularly use through your LMS? Select all that apply.
- Assessment/quiz tools
- Content libraries or textbook platforms
- Video conferencing
- Plagiarism detection
- Gradebook sync apps
- Rostering/enrollment
- Analytics or dashboards
- Parent/family communication
- External LTI tools (general)
- Other (please specify)
Integrations in my LMS generally launch and perform without unexpected errors.
My SSO login experience is consistent and predictable across different devices and browsers.
How would you describe your school's setting?
- Urban
- Suburban
- Rural
- Mixed / Other
Grades and assignment data sync accurately between integrated tools and my LMS gradebook.
When integration or SSO issues arise, my school's IT support resolves them in a timely manner.
In which country do you primarily work?
- United States
- Canada
- United Kingdom
- Australia
- New Zealand
- Other
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes dedicated opinion-scale items isolating SSO first-time-login success, cross-device consistency, and time-to-dashboard, not just general satisfaction
- Captures 30-day recall on specific integration failure types (grade sync errors, launch failures, IT resolution speed) so teams can prioritize fixes by frequency
- Pairs structured scales and multiple-choice failure-mode questions with an open-text incident description and an adaptive AI follow-up interview that can probe deeper into what teachers actually experienced
- Closes with teacher context (grade level, subject, tenure, school setting, country) enabling segmentation of reliability issues by teaching context, and produces an auto-generated report from the responses
SurveySparrow
App Integration Partnering QuestionnaireThis is a generic B2B questionnaire for evaluating potential app integration partners, not an education-specific instrument for teacher-reported LMS/SSO reliability. It's a static, fielding-ready template rather than one built around failure-mode tracking or 30-day recall benchmarking. Useful only as a loose structural reference for integration-related survey questions, not a direct competitor for this use case.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built around integration/partnership evaluation questions
- Ready-to-field template requiring no build time
- Likely covers general integration satisfaction and decision-criteria questions
아쉬운 점
- Not designed for educator audiences or LMS/SSO-specific failure points (grade sync, IT resolution, identity providers)
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual incident details
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring, and no built-in report generation focused on reliability benchmarking
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.