모든 템플릿

Loyalty Program Satisfaction & Redemption Survey

Measures loyalty program members' satisfaction with reward relevance, redemption ease, and perceived value relative to competitors to identify retention drivers and improvement priorities.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 20개 · 약 9분
Q01
메시지

Thank you for participating in this survey about your loyalty rewards program experience. This survey takes approximately 10 minutes and focuses on your experiences over the past 3 months. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions.

Q02
객관식

Are you currently a member of this brand's rewards or loyalty program?

  • Yes
  • No
  • I'm not sure
Q03
객관식

Which types of rewards from this brand are most valuable to you? Please select all that apply.

  • Money-off vouchers or discounts
  • Free product or service
  • Free shipping or delivery
  • Exclusive experiences or events
  • Partner rewards
  • Status or priority perks
  • Extended support or warranty
  • Charitable donations
  • Other (please specify)
Q04
객관식

In the past 3 months, did you redeem a reward from this program?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q05
평점 척도

Overall, how would you rate the value of this rewards program for you over the past 3 months?

범위: 15
최소:Poor최대:Excellent
Q06
장문형

Based on your experiences with this rewards program, if you could improve one thing about the rewards or redemption process, what would it be?

Q07
드롭다운

What is your age?

  • Under 18
  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback is valuable and will be used to improve the rewards program experience.

Q09
객관식

In the past 3 months, how often did you use or interact with this brand's rewards or loyalty program?

  • Not at all
  • Once
  • 2–3 times
  • 4–6 times
  • 7+ times
Q10
의견 척도

The rewards offered by this program are relevant to my interests and needs.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q11
의견 척도

Thinking about your most recent reward redemption, how easy was the process?

척도: 17
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q12
의견 척도

Compared to rewards programs from similar brands, this program offers good value for me.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q13
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to understand your rewards experience in more detail. Please share your thoughts, and our research assistant may ask a follow-up question or two.

Q14
객관식

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
의견 척도

There is a good variety of reward options to choose from in this program.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q16
객관식

During your most recent attempt to redeem a reward, did you encounter any of the following issues? Please select all that apply.

  • No issues
  • Could not find a suitable reward
  • Too many steps required
  • Technical error or app crash
  • Terms or conditions were confusing
  • Location or date restrictions
  • Other (please specify)
Q17
의견 척도

How likely are you to continue participating in this rewards program over the next 12 months?

척도: 17
최소:Very unlikely최대:Very likely
Q18
드롭다운

In which region do you currently reside?

  • United States
  • Canada
  • United Kingdom
  • Australia
  • European Union
  • India
  • Southeast Asia
  • Middle East/North Africa
  • Latin America
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
의견 척도

I earn points or rewards at a reasonable pace in this program.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q20
순위 매기기

Rank the following aspects by importance when you evaluate this brand's rewards program. Drag to reorder, with 1 being most important.

  1. Value for money
  2. Relevance to me
  3. Ease of redeeming
  4. Speed to earn
  5. Choice of rewards
드래그하여 순위 지정

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Purpose-built for loyalty programs — covers reward relevance, variety, and earn-rate perception with dedicated opinion-scale items rather than generic satisfaction questions
  • Includes a ranking exercise for what members value most and a dedicated redemption-friction question (multiple-choice on issues encountered) to pinpoint specific breakdowns
  • Adds a competitive-value comparison item ("compared to rewards programs from similar brands") and an AI follow-up interview to probe open-ended context behind ratings in real time
  • Closes with an open-text improvement question plus standard demographics, giving both quantifiable scores and qualitative detail for a full retention-driver report

Jotform

Program Satisfaction Survey Form Template

This is a generic program satisfaction form, not built specifically for loyalty or rewards programs, so it would need significant editing to address redemption, earn-rate, or reward-relevance questions. It's a fielding-ready form builder template, useful as a generic starting point rather than a loyalty-specific instrument. Jotform's strength is fast customization and native form/embed distribution.

잘하는 점

  • Quick to duplicate and customize in Jotform's drag-and-drop builder
  • Supports standard form logic and integrations typical of Jotform
  • Easy embedding/distribution via Jotform's hosting

아쉬운 점

  • Generic satisfaction wording with no loyalty-program-specific questions (reward relevance, redemption ease, earn pace)
  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up or AI-driven probing
  • No published methodology or per-response quality scoring

Typeform

Program Satisfaction Survey Template

Like Jotform's version, this is a broad 'program satisfaction' template rather than one designed around loyalty/rewards mechanics, so redemption experience and reward-value comparisons aren't built in. It is a ready-to-field conversational form, which is Typeform's core strength. Best treated as a generic base requiring loyalty-specific question additions.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time UI
  • Simple to rebrand and republish quickly
  • Good completion-rate design for short generic surveys

아쉬운 점

  • No loyalty-program-specific content (reward variety, redemption friction, competitive value perception)
  • No adaptive AI interview or voice-based follow-up capability
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring on responses

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.