Municipal Park Satisfaction & Safety Survey
Measures resident satisfaction with local park amenities, safety, and programming to help municipal parks departments prioritize improvements and track service quality over time.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In the past 12 months, how often did you visit a city park?
- Daily
- Several times a week
- About once a week
- A few times a month
- About once a month
- A few times a year
- Not in the last 12 months
Which of the following park amenities have you used in the past 12 months? Select all that apply.
- Playgrounds
- Athletic fields or courts
- Walking or running trails
- Dog area
- Restrooms
- Picnic areas or shelters
- Drinking fountains
- Lighting
- Outdoor fitness equipment
- Community garden
- None of these
- Other (please specify)
Overall, how satisfied are you with the city parks in your area?
Over the past 12 months, how safe have you generally felt during daytime visits to the park you use most?
In the past 12 months, approximately how many city-led programs or events in parks did you attend?
- 0
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6 or more
- Not sure
Based on your responses in this survey, what is the single most important change that would improve your experience with city parks? Please share your thoughts and we may ask a follow-up question.
What is your age group?
- Under 18
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will directly inform city park improvement priorities. Results will be shared publicly on the city parks website.
What is your primary way of getting to the park you visit most often?
- Walk
- Bike or scooter
- Personal car
- Public transit
- Mobility device (wheelchair, etc.)
- Ride-hail or taxi
- Other (please specify)
Overall, how would you rate the physical condition and maintenance of the park amenities you have used?
How likely are you to recommend the city parks in your area to a friend, family member, or neighbor?
Over the past 12 months, how safe have you generally felt during evening or nighttime visits to the park you use most? If you have not visited at night, select 'Not applicable.'
Which types of programs would you like to see more of in city parks? Select all that apply.
- Fitness or wellness classes
- Youth sports
- Arts, music, or movies in the park
- Nature or environmental education
- Senior-focused activities
- Volunteer days or clean-ups
- Cultural festivals
- Adaptive or inclusive programs
- Family-friendly activities
- Other (please specify)
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe (please specify)
- Prefer not to say
Please rank the following potential improvements in order of priority to you, with the most important first.
- Restroom upgrades
- Trail maintenance and repair
- More shade and trees
- Lighting improvements
- Playground upgrades
- Seating and picnic areas
In the past 12 months, have you experienced or observed any of the following safety concerns in a city park? Select all that apply.
- Poor lighting
- Isolated areas with limited visibility
- Traffic speed near park entrances
- Aggressive behavior or harassment
- Off-leash dogs in leash-required areas
- Vandalism or litter
- Lack of staff or ranger presence
- None of the above
- Other (please specify)
How would you prefer to receive information about park programs, closures, and updates? Select all that apply.
- City website
- Email newsletter
- Social media
- Text or SMS alerts
- Signs posted in the park
- Community bulletin boards
- Local news outlets
- Other (please specify)
What is your neighborhood or ZIP/postal code?
Do you have any children under 18 living in your household?
- Yes
- No
- Prefer not to say
How long have you lived in this city or area?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–3 years
- 4–9 years
- 10 or more years
- Prefer not to say
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- Some high school or less
- High school diploma or GED
- Some college or trade school
- Associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Graduate or professional degree
- Prefer not to say
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that probes each resident's single most important requested change, going beyond fixed-choice answers
- Covers both daytime and evening/nighttime safety perception separately, plus a dedicated question on observed safety incidents
- Combines a ranking exercise for improvement priorities with satisfaction, likelihood-to-recommend, and program-preference questions in one flow
- Captures demographic and neighborhood context (age, household composition, tenure, ZIP/neighborhood) to let parks departments segment results by area
SurveyMonkey
Resident Satisfaction Survey TemplateA general-purpose resident satisfaction template covering municipal services broadly rather than parks-specific amenities, safety, or programming. It's a static fielding-ready form suitable as a starting point but would need substantial customization to match park-specific topics like amenity usage or evening safety. SurveyMonkey's brand recognition and analytics dashboard are notable strengths.
잘하는 점
- Well-known, easy-to-use survey builder with broad respondent familiarity
- Built-in analytics and benchmarking tools typical of SurveyMonkey
- Ready-to-use template structure for quick deployment
아쉬운 점
- Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing on open-ended feedback
- Likely lacks parks-specific safety and amenity-usage questions out of the box
- No published methodology on question design or scoring logic
SurveySparrow
Resident Satisfaction Survey TemplateA general community/resident satisfaction template rather than one tailored to parks amenities, safety, or programming specifics. It offers a conversational chat-style UI, which improves completion rates, but relies on static predefined questions rather than adaptive interviewing. Useful as a broad resident feedback starting point, not a parks-specific instrument.
잘하는 점
- Conversational, chat-style survey format that can feel more engaging than static forms
- Mobile-friendly template design
- Quick to deploy for general resident feedback
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI-driven follow-up interview to dig into individual responses
- Not parks-specific, so likely missing amenity, safety, and programming detail out of the box
- No transparent prompt or scoring methodology published
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.