QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

High School Teacher Evaluation & Classroom Effectiveness Survey

Gathers student feedback on a teacher's instructional clarity, fairness, availability, and classroom management, then uses an AI follow-up interview to unpack a specific moment behind the overall rating. Built for department chairs, instructional coaches, and school administrators running end-of-term teacher evaluations.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 11개 · 약 6분
Q01
메시지

Hi! We'd like your honest feedback on this teacher's class this term. Your answers help the teacher grow and help the school support them better — your name isn't shared with the teacher. About 5 minutes.

Q02
의견 척도필수

Overall, how effective has this teacher been at helping you learn this term?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all effective최대:Extremely effective
Q03
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about this class?

6개 행 × 5개 열
  • Explains concepts in a way I can understand
  • Gives feedback on my work that helps me improve
  • Treats all students fairly
  • Keeps the class on track and uses class time well
  • Is available and willing to help outside of class
  • 외 1개
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
객관식

In the last month, how often did you ask this teacher for extra help outside of regular class time?

  • Never
  • Once
  • A few times
  • Almost every week
Q05
평점 척도필수

How would you rate the fairness of how grades are given in this class?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Very unfair최대:Very fair
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)

Which of these would do the most, and least, to improve this class?

  • Clearer explanations of new material
  • Faster or more detailed feedback on assignments
  • More engaging or hands-on activities
  • Better pacing (not too fast or too slow)
  • More availability for extra help
  • Fairer or clearer grading
  • More real-world examples tied to the material
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Would help most최악:Would help least
Q07
객관식필수

Would you recommend this teacher to another student choosing between class sections?

  • Yes, definitely
  • Probably
  • Probably not
  • No, definitely not
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Ask the student about one specific class session or assignment from this term that shaped their overall effectiveness rating, and have them describe exactly what happened and how the teacher responded. If they rated the teacher low, probe what would have changed the outcome; if they rated the teacher high, probe what the teacher does differently from other teachers they've had. If they flagged a specific 'improve most' item, connect it back to a concrete recent example.

Q09
드롭다운

What grade are you in?

  • 9th grade
  • 10th grade
  • 11th grade
  • 12th grade
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
단문형

What subject/course is this for? (e.g., Algebra II, U.S. History) (Prefer not to say is fine — just leave blank)

Q11
메시지

Thanks so much for your honest feedback! Your responses will be combined with other students' answers into a summary report shared with school leadership and the teacher, without your name attached.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Combines structured ratings on instructional clarity, fairness, availability, and classroom management with a matrix and max-diff to prioritize what matters most to students
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that asks each student about one specific class session or assignment, surfacing the concrete moment behind their overall rating instead of just a number
  • Captures grade level and subject via short, low-friction fields so results can be segmented by course without turning the survey into a long form
  • Auto-generates reports from responses, giving department chairs and instructional coaches a synthesized view rather than raw spreadsheet exports

SurveyMonkey

Teacher Evaluation Survey Template

A ready-to-field template covering standard teacher evaluation dimensions like instruction quality and classroom environment. It's a static question set aimed at broad administrative use rather than being tailored specifically to unpacking individual student experiences. Good for quick deployment but relies on fixed-choice and rating items only.

잘하는 점

  • Fielding-ready template that can be deployed immediately
  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and analysis tools
  • Likely customizable question library for adapting to different grade levels or subjects

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive follow-up questioning — every student sees the same fixed items regardless of their answers
  • No mechanism to probe a specific classroom moment behind a low or high rating
  • No published methodology on how questions were validated or scored

Jotform

High School Student Evaluation Form Template

A form-builder template for gathering high school student evaluation data, benefiting from Jotform's drag-and-drop customization and integrations. It appears to be a general student evaluation form rather than one purpose-built around teacher effectiveness dimensions like fairness and availability. As a form, it's built for data collection, not automated analysis of open-ended responses.

잘하는 점

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's form builder
  • Wide range of integrations (e.g., spreadsheets, storage, notifications)
  • Flexible for adapting to different evaluation contexts beyond teachers

아쉬운 점

  • Static field-based form with no adaptive AI interview to dig into specifics behind a rating
  • No automated per-response quality scoring of open-ended feedback
  • No built-in report generation summarizing qualitative themes

QuestionPro

Course evaluation sample questions and survey template

This page offers sample course/teacher evaluation questions alongside a template, functioning partly as a question-bank guide rather than a single fielding-ready survey. It covers common course evaluation angles, useful as a reference for question design. It's positioned for general course evaluation rather than specifically isolating a moment that shaped a student's overall rating.

잘하는 점

  • Broad library of sample questions across course evaluation topics
  • Backed by QuestionPro's survey logic and reporting features
  • Useful as a reference for question wording and structure

아쉬운 점

  • Presented largely as sample questions/guide content rather than a single ready-to-launch survey flow
  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up interview to explore a specific class session or assignment
  • No transparent, published prompt methodology for any AI-assisted analysis

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기