모든 템플릿

Meeting Effectiveness & Decision-Making Assessment

Evaluates meeting structure, facilitation quality, and decision follow-through to identify specific improvement opportunities. Designed for organization-wide or team-level deployment with results segmented by function, role level, and work arrangement.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 21개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome! This confidential survey asks about how your meetings are structured, facilitated, and followed through. It takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. Your participation is voluntary, and there are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses will be reported in aggregate to protect your anonymity. You may stop at any time.

Q02
드롭다운

Approximately how many hours did you spend in meetings in the last 7 days?

  • 0–2 hours
  • 3–5 hours
  • 6–10 hours
  • 11–15 hours
  • 16–20 hours
  • More than 20 hours
Q03
의견 척도

How often do meetings you attend have a clear agenda shared at least 24 hours in advance?

척도: 15
최소:Never최대:Always
Q04
의견 척도

How often are decisions, owners, and next steps clearly documented by the end of your meetings?

척도: 15
최소:Never최대:Always
Q05
의견 척도

Overall, how would you rate the effectiveness of meetings at your organization?

척도: 17
최소:Very ineffective최대:Very effective
Q06
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, what is one change that would make your meetings more effective?

Q07
드롭다운

What is your primary team or function?

  • Engineering
  • Product
  • Design
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Operations
  • Customer Support
  • HR / People
  • Finance
  • Legal
  • Other (please specify)
Q08
메시지

Thank you for your time and insights! Your responses will be reviewed in aggregate to help improve how meetings are planned, facilitated, and followed through across the organization.

Q09
드롭다운

How often do you attend recurring team meetings (e.g., standups, syncs, staff meetings)?

  • Daily
  • 2–3 times a week
  • Weekly
  • Every other week
  • Monthly
  • Less often or rarely
  • Not applicable
Q10
객관식

For most recurring meetings you attend, which of the following does the agenda typically include? (Select all that apply)

  • Specific discussion topics
  • Time allocations for each topic
  • Pre-read materials or links
  • Clearly identified decision points
  • Named facilitator or meeting owner
  • Expected outcomes or goals
  • None of the above
Q11
객관식

In the last 30 days, how often were meeting decisions revisited because ownership or next steps were unclear?

  • Never
  • 1–2 times
  • 3–4 times
  • 5 or more times
  • Not applicable
Q12
순위 매기기

Rank the following practices by their potential impact on your meeting effectiveness (drag to reorder, most impactful first).

  1. Clear agenda shared in advance
  2. Smaller attendee list
  3. Strong facilitator
  4. Strict timeboxing
  5. Pre-reads circulated beforehand
  6. Decision log with owners and deadlines
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q13
AI 인터뷰

You mentioned areas where meetings could improve. Could you tell me more about a specific recent meeting experience that stood out — positively or negatively?

Q14
드롭다운

What is your role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Director / Head
  • Executive
  • Other
Q15
의견 척도

How often do meetings you attend start and end on time?

척도: 15
최소:Never최대:Always
Q16
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree: Our team's meeting norms support timely decision-making.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q17
객관식

Which meeting types do you find least valuable for your work? (Select all that apply)

  • Status updates
  • Brainstorming / ideation
  • Decision-making meetings
  • One-on-ones
  • All-hands / town halls
  • Project kickoffs
  • Daily standups
  • Cross-functional syncs
  • None — all feel valuable
Q18
드롭다운

How long have you been at the company?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6+ years
Q19
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree: Participants in my meetings have a fair chance to contribute without interruptions.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q20
객관식

Which best describes your preference for meeting cadence?

  • Fewer but longer meetings
  • More but shorter meetings
  • Current cadence is about right
  • No strong preference
Q21
드롭다운

What is your primary work arrangement?

  • On-site mostly
  • Hybrid
  • Remote mostly

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Pairs scaled questions on agenda clarity, punctuality, and decision documentation with an open-text prompt and an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes the specific improvement area each respondent names
  • Directly measures decision follow-through (how often decisions get revisited due to unclear ownership) rather than only general meeting satisfaction
  • Segments results by function, role level, tenure, and work arrangement for organization-wide or team-level rollups
  • Includes a ranking exercise so respondents prioritize which practices would most improve effectiveness, giving actionable prioritization instead of a single satisfaction score

Jotform

Meeting Effectiveness Survey Form Template

A ready-to-use static form covering general meeting satisfaction and effectiveness questions, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's a genuine fielding-ready template for this topic, but it's a fixed question set rather than a dynamic assessment instrument. No indication it segments results by function, role level, or work arrangement out of the box.

잘하는 점

  • Fast to deploy using Jotform's widely-used drag-and-drop builder
  • Customizable fields and branding within Jotform's ecosystem
  • Straightforward, familiar form format for respondents

아쉬운 점

  • Static question list with no adaptive follow-up probing based on a respondent's answers
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No built-in segmentation by function, role level, tenure, or work arrangement

SurveySparrow

Meeting Preparation Checklist Template

This is a checklist for planning individual meetings (agenda prep, logistics) rather than a survey instrument for assessing meeting effectiveness or decision-making across an organization. It can be distributed via SurveySparrow's conversational form format, but it does not appear designed to measure facilitation quality or decision follow-through at scale.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-style UI that SurveySparrow is known for
  • Simple to use for pre-meeting planning checks
  • Easy to distribute to teams before recurring meetings

아쉬운 점

  • Checklist format, not a scaled survey instrument measuring meeting effectiveness or decision follow-through
  • No adaptive AI interview or follow-up probing on open responses
  • No automated quality scoring or segmented reporting by function/role/work arrangement

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.