QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Training Program Effectiveness & Satisfaction Survey

Evaluates how well a training program delivered on content quality, instructor effectiveness, and real-world applicability, including a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in future sessions. An AI follow-up interview digs into whether participants have actually used the skills on the job and what got in the way if not. Built for L&D teams and training providers assessing course impact.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on the training you recently completed! Your honest feedback shapes how we run future sessions. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 5 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

Which training program did you recently complete? (Replace with your actual program name or list — Template note: customize with your course catalog before launching.)

  • (Program A)
  • (Program B)
  • (Program C)
  • Other
Q03
의견 척도필수

Overall, how satisfied were you with this training?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q04
매트릭스필수

Please rate the following aspects of the training you completed.

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Relevance of the content to your role
  • Instructor's knowledge and delivery
  • Pacing (too fast, too slow, or right)
  • Quality of materials and resources provided
  • Amount of hands-on practice or exercises
열: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q05
의견 척도필수

How confident are you in applying what you learned to your actual work?

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q06
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this training to a colleague?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

When you think about what makes training genuinely useful, which of these matter most to you and which matter least?

  • Depth of subject matter content
  • Instructor's real-world expertise
  • Hands-on practice and exercises
  • Pacing and time management
  • Quality of take-home materials
  • Flexibility of schedule or format
  • Opportunities to ask questions
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q08
객관식

For future training, which format would you prefer?

  • In-person, instructor-led
  • Live virtual session
  • Self-paced online
  • Blended (mix of formats)
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Explore whether the respondent has actually used the skills from this training on the job since completing it — ask for a specific example if possible. If their confidence rating was low, probe what specifically is blocking them (unclear content, lack of manager support, no opportunity to practice, etc.). If confidence was high, ask what made the transfer to real work easy, and what would make the next training session even more useful.

Q10
장문형

Any other feedback on how we could improve this training program?

Q11
객관식

Which best describes your role or department?

  • (Department A)
  • (Department B)
  • (Department C)
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How long have you been with the organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 2 years
  • 2 to 5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you for your feedback! Your responses will be combined with others to improve upcoming training sessions and course design.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a matrix rating of specific training aspects (content quality, instructor, applicability) plus a dedicated confidence-in-application scale, going beyond a single satisfaction score
  • Uses a best-worst (max-diff) trade-off to identify what respondents actually value most in future training, giving prioritized data rather than flat ratings
  • Pairs the survey with an AI follow-up interview that probes whether participants have actually used the skills on the job and what got in the way if not — something static forms can't do
  • Auto-generates a report combining scaled responses, the trade-off ranking, and interview findings for L&D teams, with transparent prompts showing exactly what the AI asked

Jotform

Training Satisfaction Survey Form Template

A ready-to-use, customizable form for gathering post-training satisfaction feedback, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It covers standard satisfaction and feedback fields but is a static form rather than an adaptive interview. Good for quick deployment, not for deeper qualitative follow-up.

잘하는 점

  • Easy to customize and embed via Jotform's form builder
  • Fast to deploy for basic post-training feedback collection
  • Supports typical form logic and integrations common to Jotform templates

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe on-the-job skill application
  • Static question set with no mechanism to explore why skills weren't used
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated reporting

QuestionPro

Sales Training Meeting Satisfaction Survey Template

A static survey template focused specifically on sales training meetings rather than general L&D program evaluation. It's fielding-ready within QuestionPro's platform but narrower in scope than a general training effectiveness survey. Useful if the audience is exclusively sales teams, less so for cross-department training evaluation.

잘하는 점

  • Tailored wording for sales-specific training contexts
  • Built on QuestionPro's established survey platform and reporting tools
  • Ready to field with minimal setup

아쉬운 점

  • Narrow focus on sales training rather than general program effectiveness
  • No adaptive AI interviewing to explore actual post-training skill usage
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated qualitative analysis

Typeform

Training Effectiveness Evaluation Form Template

A conversational, one-question-at-a-time form for evaluating training effectiveness, benefiting from Typeform's polished UI and completion-friendly design. It's a static question set, however, with no branching AI interview to dig into whether learning transferred to the job. Best suited for quick-turnaround feedback rather than deeper diagnostic insight.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, engaging conversational interface that can improve completion rates
  • Simple to customize within Typeform's ecosystem
  • Mobile-friendly presentation of questions

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview option to probe real-world application
  • Cannot dynamically explore barriers to using trained skills
  • No automated quality scoring or AI-generated synthesis report

SurveyMonkey

Training Course Evaluation Template: Questions & Feedback Guide

This page reads more like a guide to training evaluation questions than a single fielding-ready template, offering advice and sample questions to build a survey. It's useful for inspiration but requires assembly work before deployment. It does not include any interview-style follow-up mechanism.

잘하는 점

  • Educational content explaining what to ask and why in course evaluations
  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's broad survey platform and distribution tools
  • Sample questions cover common evaluation dimensions

아쉬운 점

  • Presented as a guide/blog rather than a ready-to-field template
  • No adaptive AI interview to assess actual post-training behavior change
  • No transparent prompt design or automated per-response scoring

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기