모든 템플릿

Organizational Culture & Employee Trust Assessment

Measures how employees actually experience your stated values day-to-day — trust, psychological safety, recognition, and manager role-modeling — plus an AI follow-up interview that surfaces the specific moments behind low-trust or low-safety scores. Built for HR, People Ops, and leadership teams running annual or pulse culture audits.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking part in our culture check-in. We want to understand how our stated values actually show up in day-to-day work — your honest answers matter more than diplomatic ones. This takes about 6-7 minutes and your individual responses are kept confidential.

Q02
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about your day-to-day experience at work?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • I can raise a mistake or disagreement without fear of it being held against me
  • People here are recognized for good work, not just visibility or tenure
  • Decisions that affect my team are explained, not just announced
  • My team collaborates across departments without unnecessary friction
  • The way people actually behave here matches what leadership says we value
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q03
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this company as a great place to work to a friend or former colleague?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q04
객관식필수

In the last 30 days, how often did you see a colleague's differing opinion openly welcomed in a meeting?

  • Never
  • Rarely
  • Sometimes
  • Often
  • Every meeting I attended
Q05
순위 매기기

Rank these company values by how consistently you see them show up in everyday decisions, from most to least consistent. (Template note: replace with your organization's actual stated values before launching.)

  1. (Value A - e.g. Customer obsession)
  2. (Value B - e.g. Ownership)
  3. (Value C - e.g. Integrity)
  4. (Value D - e.g. Innovation)
  5. (Value E - e.g. Teamwork)
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q06
점수 배분

If leadership had 100 points to spend improving our culture this year, how would you allocate them across these areas?

  • Trust & psychological safety
  • Recognition & fair reward
  • Communication & transparency
  • Cross-team collaboration
  • Manager quality & coaching
100점 배분
Q07
평점 척도필수

How well does your immediate manager model the behaviors our company says it values?

범위: 15
최소:Doesn't model them at all최대:Models them consistently
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Anchor on the respondent's likelihood-to-recommend score and their agreement ratings on speaking up without fear and recognition. If either was low or mid-range, ask for a specific recent moment that shaped that view — what happened, who was involved, and what would have made it feel safer or fairer. If everything scored high, ask what one thing would most put that trust at risk. Push for one concrete example rather than general impressions, and note whether the issue seems tied to their direct manager, a team dynamic, or company-wide leadership.

Q09
객관식

In the past 6 months, have culture-related reasons (not pay or role) made you seriously consider leaving?

  • Yes, seriously considered it
  • It crossed my mind briefly
  • No, not really
Q10
메시지

Now just a few quick background questions to help us spot patterns across teams. All of these are optional.

Q11
드롭다운

Which department or team are you part of?

  • (Replace with Department A)
  • (Replace with Department B)
  • (Replace with Department C)
  • (Replace with Department D)
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How long have you been with the company?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 2 years
  • 2 to 5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

Which best describes your role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Senior leader / executive
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

That's everything — thank you for your candor. Responses are aggregated into a culture report for leadership, and your AI follow-up answer will only be shared as an anonymized theme, never attributed to you.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Pairs structured measurement (matrix, rating, ranking, constant sum, opinion scale) with an AI follow-up interview that specifically anchors on each respondent's likelihood-to-recommend score and agreement ratings to dig into the moments behind low-trust or low-safety scores
  • Includes a dedicated manager role-modeling rating item and a values-ranking exercise so leadership can see which stated values actually show up day-to-day versus which don't
  • Captures attrition-risk signal directly (whether culture, not pay or role, has prompted job-search behavior in the past 6 months) alongside department, tenure, and role-level breakdowns for pattern analysis
  • Uses conversational chat-message framing to set context and close out the survey, then aggregates everything into an automated report rather than leaving analysis to the buyer

Jotform

Organizational Culture Survey Form Template

A static, ready-to-field form template covering general culture perception questions. It's built on Jotform's broad form-builder platform, so it's easy to customize fields and branding, but it's a generic form rather than a purpose-built research instrument for trust/psychological-safety measurement.

잘하는 점

  • Quick to deploy and customize using Jotform's drag-and-drop builder
  • Familiar, low-friction form format for respondents
  • Broad platform integrations typical of Jotform's ecosystem

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive follow-up questioning — respondents answer the same fixed fields regardless of their scores
  • No AI-driven interview or probing to surface the specific moments behind a low score
  • No published methodology or automated culture-specific reporting layer

QuestionPro

Organizational Culture Assessment Survey Template

A structured culture-assessment template from an established enterprise survey platform, likely including standard Likert-style culture items and QuestionPro's own analytics/reporting dashboards. It's a solid fielding-ready survey, but it functions as a fixed questionnaire rather than an interview that adapts to each respondent's answers.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by a mature enterprise survey platform with dashboarding and analytics
  • Likely includes benchmarking or industry-standard culture question sets
  • Supports large-scale distribution typical of QuestionPro's toolset

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe why a respondent gave a specific trust or safety score
  • No voice-based interview option
  • No transparent, published prompt-level methodology for how follow-up questions would be generated

SurveyMonkey

Organizational Culture Survey Template

A recognizable, easy-to-launch culture survey template from a mainstream survey platform, suitable for quick pulse checks. It relies on standard closed-ended question types and SurveyMonkey's built-in reporting, without any mechanism to dig deeper into individual low-trust responses.

잘하는 점

  • Very quick to launch given SurveyMonkey's simple builder and wide familiarity
  • Built-in basic analytics and reporting
  • Easy distribution across email/link channels

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive probing based on individual responses
  • No AI or voice interview component to surface qualitative context behind scores
  • No per-response quality scoring or transparent methodology disclosure

SurveySparrow

360 Culture Assessment Survey

A conversational-style survey template that likely presents questions one at a time in SurveySparrow's chat-like UI, giving it a friendlier respondent experience than a traditional grid form. It's framed as a 360-style assessment, but the conversational format is scripted, not an adaptive AI interview that reacts to what a respondent actually said.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-style question flow that can feel more engaging than a traditional form
  • 360-style framing suggests multi-angle culture questions
  • Mobile-friendly presentation typical of SurveySparrow's product

아쉬운 점

  • Conversational UI is scripted, not an AI-driven interview that adapts follow-up questions to each answer
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No published per-response quality scoring or prompt transparency

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.