AI Ethics Awareness Survey for Students
An academic instrument measuring student awareness of, exposure to, and attitudes toward artificial intelligence ethics. Covers concept familiarity, training exposure, ethical dilemma responses, regulation views, and willingness to prioritize ethics over convenience. Estimated completion: 8–12 minutes.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Are you currently enrolled as a student at a college or university (full-time or part-time)?
- Yes
- No
Which of the following best describes your current level of study?
- First-year undergraduate
- Second-year undergraduate
- Third-year undergraduate
- Fourth-year undergraduate or beyond
- Master's / professional degree student
- Doctoral (PhD) student
- Other (please specify)
The following questions ask about specific concepts related to artificial intelligence. Please indicate your level of familiarity with each.
Have you received any formal education or training specifically on ethics related to artificial intelligence? Select all that apply.
- Yes — as part of a required course
- Yes — as part of an elective course
- Yes — through a workshop, seminar, or extracurricular program
- Yes — through self-directed learning (e.g., online courses, readings)
- No — I have not received any AI ethics training
- I'm not sure
The next questions describe hypothetical situations involving AI. Please read each scenario carefully and select the option closest to what you would actually do — not what you think you should do.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements?
Imagine you are choosing between two AI-powered study tools: • Tool A is more accurate and convenient but collects extensive personal data with limited transparency about how it works. • Tool B is slightly less accurate but is fully transparent about data use and has been independently audited for fairness. Which tool would you choose?
- Definitely Tool A (more accurate/convenient)
- Probably Tool A
- It would depend on the specific situation
- Probably Tool B
- Definitely Tool B (more ethical/transparent)
How concerned are you about the ethical implications of AI in each of the following areas?
Based on your responses throughout this survey, please share any additional thoughts, experiences, or concerns you have about AI ethics — particularly anything that was not covered in the previous questions.
Finally, we have a few background questions. These are used for analysis purposes only and will not be used to identify you.
What is your primary field of study?
- Computer Science / Information Technology
- Engineering
- Natural Sciences (Biology, Chemistry, Physics, etc.)
- Mathematics / Statistics
- Business / Management / Economics
- Social Sciences (Psychology, Sociology, Political Science, etc.)
- Humanities (Philosophy, History, Literature, etc.)
- Arts / Design / Media
- Education
- Health Sciences / Medicine / Nursing
- Law
- Other (please specify)
How familiar are you with the concept of algorithmic bias (i.e., systematic errors in AI outputs that disadvantage certain groups)?
How would you rate the overall quality of the AI ethics education or training you received?
Scenario 1: You are completing a major course assignment and discover that the AI tool you used has generated content that closely mirrors an existing published source without attribution. What would you most likely do?
- Remove the AI-generated content entirely and rewrite it myself
- Keep the content but add a proper citation to the original source
- Flag the issue to my instructor and ask for guidance
- Keep the content as-is — the AI generated it, so it's not really plagiarism
- I'm not sure what I would do
AI systems should be required to explain how they reach their decisions.
How willing would you be to pay a small fee to use an AI tool that is more ethical and transparent, instead of a free tool with less transparency?
Education and academic integrity
What is your age?
- 18–20
- 21–23
- 24–26
- 27–30
- 31–35
- 36–40
- 41 or older
- Prefer not to say
How frequently do you use AI-powered tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Grammarly, image generators) for academic or personal tasks?
- Daily
- Several times a week
- About once a week
- A few times a month
- Rarely (less than once a month)
- Never
How familiar are you with the concept of fairness in AI (i.e., ensuring AI systems treat all individuals and groups equitably)?
Scenario 2: A classmate shows you an AI tool that can generate highly realistic fake references for a research paper. They suggest you both use it to save time. What would you most likely do?
- Decline and explain why I think it's wrong
- Decline but not say anything to my classmate about their choice
- Report the tool or the situation to an instructor or academic integrity office
- Consider using it depending on the stakes of the assignment
- Use it — if the references look real, it probably doesn't matter
- I'm not sure what I would do
Companies developing AI should be held legally responsible for harm caused by their systems.
How willing would you be to accept slower processing times in exchange for AI systems that provide clearer explanations of their outputs?
Employment and hiring decisions
What is your gender identity?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary / genderqueer
- A gender identity not listed here (please specify)
- Prefer not to say
How familiar are you with the concept of AI transparency and explainability (i.e., the ability to understand and explain how an AI system reaches its decisions)?
Government regulation of AI is necessary to protect the public.
How willing would you be to receive less personalized AI recommendations in exchange for stronger protection of your personal data?
Healthcare and medical diagnosis
In which country are you currently studying?
- United States
- United Kingdom
- Canada
- Australia
- Germany
- India
- China
- Netherlands
- France
- Japan
- Brazil
- South Korea
- Other (please specify)
- Prefer not to say
How familiar are you with the concept of accountability for AI decisions (i.e., determining who is responsible when an AI system causes harm)?
Universities should require AI ethics training for all students, regardless of their field of study.
How willing would you be to spend extra time learning how to use a more ethical AI tool, even if a less ethical alternative were easier to use?
Criminal justice and policing
How familiar are you with concerns about data privacy in AI systems (i.e., how AI systems collect, store, and use personal data)?
Individuals should have the right to know when they are interacting with an AI system rather than a human.
Social media and content moderation
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes a dedicated concept-familiarity battery (algorithmic bias, fairness, transparency, accountability, data privacy) that maps directly to AI ethics literacy rather than generic brand or product recall
- Uses two hypothetical ethical-dilemma scenarios (multiple-choice) to probe actual decision-making, not just self-reported attitudes
- Adds an AI follow-up interview question that adapts based on the respondent's prior answers to surface open-ended reasoning automated report generation can then summarize
- Includes trade-off questions (willingness to pay, accept slower processing, less personalization, extra learning time) to quantify how far students will go to prioritize ethics over convenience
QuestionPro
10 Product Awareness & Attitudes Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is a generic awareness-and-attitudes questionnaire guide aimed at product/brand research, not an AI ethics or student-specific instrument. It's useful as a structural reference for building awareness+attitude question sets but reads more as an explainer article with an embedded sample template than a ready-to-field academic survey. Topic, audience, and question content would need substantial rewriting to fit AI ethics research with students.
잘하는 점
- Established survey platform with broad question-type library and customization tools
- Provides a clear framework (awareness -> attitude -> usage) that researchers can adapt
- Includes a sample questionnaire alongside the explanatory guide
아쉬운 점
- Not built for AI ethics topics or student populations — no concept-familiarity, dilemma-scenario, or regulation-attitude content specific to this subject
- Static question format with no adaptive AI follow-up probing or automated per-response quality scoring
- No transparent documentation of underlying prompts/methodology since it isn't an AI-driven interview tool
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.