모든 템플릿

AI Ethics Awareness Survey for Students

An academic instrument measuring student awareness of, exposure to, and attitudes toward artificial intelligence ethics. Covers concept familiarity, training exposure, ethical dilemma responses, regulation views, and willingness to prioritize ethics over convenience. Estimated completion: 8–12 minutes.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 38개 · 약 15분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to this research survey about your experiences with and views on artificial intelligence. This survey is being conducted for academic research purposes. Your participation is completely voluntary, and you may stop at any time without penalty. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions and experiences. Your responses will be kept confidential, analyzed in aggregate, and reported anonymously. No individual responses will be shared. The survey should take approximately 8–12 minutes to complete. By continuing, you confirm that you are 18 years of age or older and consent to participate in this study.

Q02
객관식

Are you currently enrolled as a student at a college or university (full-time or part-time)?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
객관식

Which of the following best describes your current level of study?

  • First-year undergraduate
  • Second-year undergraduate
  • Third-year undergraduate
  • Fourth-year undergraduate or beyond
  • Master's / professional degree student
  • Doctoral (PhD) student
  • Other (please specify)
Q04
메시지

The following questions ask about specific concepts related to artificial intelligence. Please indicate your level of familiarity with each.

Q05
객관식

Have you received any formal education or training specifically on ethics related to artificial intelligence? Select all that apply.

  • Yes — as part of a required course
  • Yes — as part of an elective course
  • Yes — through a workshop, seminar, or extracurricular program
  • Yes — through self-directed learning (e.g., online courses, readings)
  • No — I have not received any AI ethics training
  • I'm not sure
Q06
메시지

The next questions describe hypothetical situations involving AI. Please read each scenario carefully and select the option closest to what you would actually do — not what you think you should do.

Q07
메시지

To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements?

Q08
객관식

Imagine you are choosing between two AI-powered study tools: • Tool A is more accurate and convenient but collects extensive personal data with limited transparency about how it works. • Tool B is slightly less accurate but is fully transparent about data use and has been independently audited for fairness. Which tool would you choose?

  • Definitely Tool A (more accurate/convenient)
  • Probably Tool A
  • It would depend on the specific situation
  • Probably Tool B
  • Definitely Tool B (more ethical/transparent)
Q09
메시지

How concerned are you about the ethical implications of AI in each of the following areas?

Q10
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses throughout this survey, please share any additional thoughts, experiences, or concerns you have about AI ethics — particularly anything that was not covered in the previous questions.

Q11
메시지

Finally, we have a few background questions. These are used for analysis purposes only and will not be used to identify you.

Q12
드롭다운

What is your primary field of study?

  • Computer Science / Information Technology
  • Engineering
  • Natural Sciences (Biology, Chemistry, Physics, etc.)
  • Mathematics / Statistics
  • Business / Management / Economics
  • Social Sciences (Psychology, Sociology, Political Science, etc.)
  • Humanities (Philosophy, History, Literature, etc.)
  • Arts / Design / Media
  • Education
  • Health Sciences / Medicine / Nursing
  • Law
  • Other (please specify)
Q13
의견 척도

How familiar are you with the concept of algorithmic bias (i.e., systematic errors in AI outputs that disadvantage certain groups)?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all familiar최대:Extremely familiar
Q14
의견 척도

How would you rate the overall quality of the AI ethics education or training you received?

척도: 15
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q15
객관식

Scenario 1: You are completing a major course assignment and discover that the AI tool you used has generated content that closely mirrors an existing published source without attribution. What would you most likely do?

  • Remove the AI-generated content entirely and rewrite it myself
  • Keep the content but add a proper citation to the original source
  • Flag the issue to my instructor and ask for guidance
  • Keep the content as-is — the AI generated it, so it's not really plagiarism
  • I'm not sure what I would do
Q16
의견 척도

AI systems should be required to explain how they reach their decisions.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q17
의견 척도

How willing would you be to pay a small fee to use an AI tool that is more ethical and transparent, instead of a free tool with less transparency?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all willing최대:Completely willing
Q18
의견 척도

Education and academic integrity

척도: 15
최소:Not at all concerned최대:Extremely concerned
Q19
드롭다운

What is your age?

  • 18–20
  • 21–23
  • 24–26
  • 27–30
  • 31–35
  • 36–40
  • 41 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
객관식

How frequently do you use AI-powered tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Grammarly, image generators) for academic or personal tasks?

  • Daily
  • Several times a week
  • About once a week
  • A few times a month
  • Rarely (less than once a month)
  • Never
Q21
의견 척도

How familiar are you with the concept of fairness in AI (i.e., ensuring AI systems treat all individuals and groups equitably)?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all familiar최대:Extremely familiar
Q22
객관식

Scenario 2: A classmate shows you an AI tool that can generate highly realistic fake references for a research paper. They suggest you both use it to save time. What would you most likely do?

  • Decline and explain why I think it's wrong
  • Decline but not say anything to my classmate about their choice
  • Report the tool or the situation to an instructor or academic integrity office
  • Consider using it depending on the stakes of the assignment
  • Use it — if the references look real, it probably doesn't matter
  • I'm not sure what I would do
Q23
의견 척도

Companies developing AI should be held legally responsible for harm caused by their systems.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q24
의견 척도

How willing would you be to accept slower processing times in exchange for AI systems that provide clearer explanations of their outputs?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all willing최대:Completely willing
Q25
의견 척도

Employment and hiring decisions

척도: 15
최소:Not at all concerned최대:Extremely concerned
Q26
객관식

What is your gender identity?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary / genderqueer
  • A gender identity not listed here (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say
Q27
의견 척도

How familiar are you with the concept of AI transparency and explainability (i.e., the ability to understand and explain how an AI system reaches its decisions)?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all familiar최대:Extremely familiar
Q28
의견 척도

Government regulation of AI is necessary to protect the public.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q29
의견 척도

How willing would you be to receive less personalized AI recommendations in exchange for stronger protection of your personal data?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all willing최대:Completely willing
Q30
의견 척도

Healthcare and medical diagnosis

척도: 15
최소:Not at all concerned최대:Extremely concerned
Q31
드롭다운

In which country are you currently studying?

  • United States
  • United Kingdom
  • Canada
  • Australia
  • Germany
  • India
  • China
  • Netherlands
  • France
  • Japan
  • Brazil
  • South Korea
  • Other (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say
Q32
의견 척도

How familiar are you with the concept of accountability for AI decisions (i.e., determining who is responsible when an AI system causes harm)?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all familiar최대:Extremely familiar
Q33
의견 척도

Universities should require AI ethics training for all students, regardless of their field of study.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q34
의견 척도

How willing would you be to spend extra time learning how to use a more ethical AI tool, even if a less ethical alternative were easier to use?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all willing최대:Completely willing
Q35
의견 척도

Criminal justice and policing

척도: 15
최소:Not at all concerned최대:Extremely concerned
Q36
의견 척도

How familiar are you with concerns about data privacy in AI systems (i.e., how AI systems collect, store, and use personal data)?

척도: 15
최소:Not at all familiar최대:Extremely familiar
Q37
의견 척도

Individuals should have the right to know when they are interacting with an AI system rather than a human.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q38
의견 척도

Social media and content moderation

척도: 15
최소:Not at all concerned최대:Extremely concerned

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a dedicated concept-familiarity battery (algorithmic bias, fairness, transparency, accountability, data privacy) that maps directly to AI ethics literacy rather than generic brand or product recall
  • Uses two hypothetical ethical-dilemma scenarios (multiple-choice) to probe actual decision-making, not just self-reported attitudes
  • Adds an AI follow-up interview question that adapts based on the respondent's prior answers to surface open-ended reasoning automated report generation can then summarize
  • Includes trade-off questions (willingness to pay, accept slower processing, less personalization, extra learning time) to quantify how far students will go to prioritize ethics over convenience

QuestionPro

10 Product Awareness & Attitudes Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a generic awareness-and-attitudes questionnaire guide aimed at product/brand research, not an AI ethics or student-specific instrument. It's useful as a structural reference for building awareness+attitude question sets but reads more as an explainer article with an embedded sample template than a ready-to-field academic survey. Topic, audience, and question content would need substantial rewriting to fit AI ethics research with students.

잘하는 점

  • Established survey platform with broad question-type library and customization tools
  • Provides a clear framework (awareness -> attitude -> usage) that researchers can adapt
  • Includes a sample questionnaire alongside the explanatory guide

아쉬운 점

  • Not built for AI ethics topics or student populations — no concept-familiarity, dilemma-scenario, or regulation-attitude content specific to this subject
  • Static question format with no adaptive AI follow-up probing or automated per-response quality scoring
  • No transparent documentation of underlying prompts/methodology since it isn't an AI-driven interview tool

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.