모든 템플릿

Student Attitudes Toward AI Writing Tools

An academic research survey examining how college and university students perceive and use AI writing tools such as ChatGPT, Copilot, and similar technologies. The survey covers usage patterns, perceived benefits and dependency concerns, academic integrity perspectives, quality comparisons, and instructor communication about AI policies.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 29개 · 약 12분
Q01
객관식

Are you currently enrolled as a student at a college or university?

  • Yes
  • No
Q02
메시지

Thank you for your interest in this study. We are conducting academic research on how students use and perceive AI writing tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, Grammarly AI, and similar technologies). This survey will take approximately 10–14 minutes to complete. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time without penalty. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions and experiences. All responses are anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate. No personally identifying information will be collected. Results will be used for academic research purposes. By continuing, you indicate that you have read and understood this information and consent to participate.

Q03
객관식

What is your current level of study?

  • First-year undergraduate
  • Second-year undergraduate
  • Third-year undergraduate
  • Fourth-year or beyond undergraduate
  • Master's student
  • Doctoral student
  • Professional degree student (e.g., JD, MD, MBA)
  • Other
Q04
메시지

The next questions ask about your views on AI writing tools. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with each statement.

Q05
의견 척도

I worry that relying on AI writing tools is making me a less skilled writer.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q06
메시지

The following questions ask about your views on AI writing tools and academic integrity. Remember, your responses are completely anonymous — there are no right or wrong answers.

Q07
의견 척도

Compared to writing you produce entirely on your own, how would you rate the overall quality of writing you produce with AI assistance?

척도: 17
최소:Much lower quality최대:Much higher quality
Q08
의견 척도

My instructors have clearly communicated their expectations about AI writing tool use in their courses.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q09
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to understand how you actually use AI writing tools in your academic work. In the conversation below, please describe your typical writing process when working on an academic assignment with AI tools. Walk us through from start to finish — how do you begin, when and how do you involve the AI tool, and how do you finalize your work?

Q10
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about AI writing tools in academic settings.

Q11
메시지

Finally, a few optional questions about you for analysis purposes. These will only be used to examine group-level patterns and will not be used to identify you.

Q12
객관식

Which of the following AI writing tools have you used for academic work? Select all that apply.

  • ChatGPT (OpenAI)
  • Microsoft Copilot
  • Google Gemini
  • Grammarly AI features
  • Claude (Anthropic)
  • Jasper
  • Quillbot AI
  • Other AI writing tool
  • I have not used any AI writing tools for academic work
Q13
의견 척도

AI writing tools help me produce higher-quality academic work.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q14
의견 척도

I would find it difficult to complete writing assignments without AI tools.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q15
의견 척도

Using AI writing tools to generate a first draft of an assignment is academically honest.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q16
의견 척도

Compared to writing you produce entirely on your own, to what extent does writing you produce with AI assistance reflect your own voice and ideas?

척도: 17
최소:Reflects my voice much less최대:Reflects my voice much more
Q17
의견 척도

How consistent are AI writing tool policies across your different courses?

척도: 17
최소:Very inconsistent최대:Very consistent
Q18
드롭다운

What is your age range?

  • 18–20
  • 21–23
  • 24–26
  • 27–30
  • 31–35
  • 36–40
  • 41 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
객관식

In a typical month during the academic term, how often do you use AI writing tools for academic work?

  • Never
  • Rarely (1–2 times per month)
  • Sometimes (3–5 times per month)
  • Often (6–10 times per month)
  • Very often (more than 10 times per month)
Q20
의견 척도

AI writing tools save me significant time on academic assignments.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q21
의견 척도

I feel confident in my own writing abilities independent of AI tools.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q22
의견 척도

Using AI writing tools to edit and polish your own writing is academically honest.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q23
객관식

Which of the following best describes the most common AI writing tool policy you encounter in your courses?

  • AI tools are fully prohibited
  • AI tools are allowed only for brainstorming or outlining
  • AI tools are allowed with required disclosure or citation
  • AI tools are allowed without restrictions
  • No AI policy has been stated or discussed
  • Policies vary too much to identify a common one
  • I am not sure
Q24
드롭다운

What is your gender identity?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q25
객관식

For which of the following academic tasks do you use AI writing tools? Select all that apply.

  • Brainstorming or generating ideas
  • Creating outlines or organizing content
  • Drafting paragraphs or full sections
  • Editing or revising my own writing
  • Paraphrasing or summarizing sources
  • Checking grammar and style
  • Generating citations or references
  • Translating text between languages
  • Understanding assignment requirements or prompts
  • Studying or preparing for exams
  • Other (please specify)
  • I do not use AI writing tools for academic tasks
Q26
의견 척도

AI writing tools help me better understand course material.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q27
의견 척도

Submitting AI-generated text as your own work without disclosure is a form of academic dishonesty.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q28
드롭다운

What is your primary field of study?

  • Arts & Humanities
  • Social Sciences
  • Business & Economics
  • Natural Sciences
  • Engineering & Technology
  • Health Sciences & Medicine
  • Education
  • Law
  • Mathematics & Statistics
  • Computer Science & Information Technology
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q29
의견 척도

Current academic integrity policies at my institution adequately address the use of AI writing tools.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a generic academic form by naming specific tools (ChatGPT, Copilot, etc.) and asking about frequency and task-level usage patterns.
  • Includes a dedicated opinion-scale block on academic integrity — covering drafting, editing, and non-disclosure — plus a separate block on perceived quality and dependency.
  • Adds an AI follow-up interview segment to probe how students actually use these tools in practice, beyond fixed-choice answers, with an open-text reflection question at the end.
  • Captures instructor-policy clarity and cross-course consistency, topics a generic academic template wouldn't anticipate, alongside standard demographic dropdowns.

Typeform

Academic Research Form Template

This is a generic academic research form template rather than one built around AI writing tools or student attitudes specifically — researchers would need to write all the topic-specific questions themselves. It offers Typeform's conversational one-question-at-a-time interface, which is pleasant for respondents but functions as a static form once published. Useful as a generic starting shell, not as a ready-to-field survey on this topic.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, conversational form-filling experience that Typeform is known for
  • Flexible/generic structure adaptable to many kinds of academic research
  • Quick to customize for simple studies

아쉬운 점

  • No content specific to AI writing tools, academic integrity, or student usage patterns — all of it would need to be authored from scratch
  • Static question flow with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into open-ended answers
  • No built-in per-response quality scoring or automated analytical report generation

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.